Cited by 9Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignDisability Rights and Representation

From Awareness to Action: Teaching Software Accessibility for Neurodiverse Users

Kletenik, Devorah, Minkowitz, Rachel, Peric, Aleksandra, Sahin, Mehmet, Adler, Rachel F.·2024·Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1

Abstract

Neurodiversity affects about 15-20% of the population and neurodiverse users can struggle with software usability. However, there are few initiatives geared at educating about accessibility for neurodiversity. We begin conversation about this topic by synthesizing accessibility guidelines for some of the neurodiverse population -- people on the autism spectrum, people with dyslexia and people with ADHD -- and giving guidelines about teaching about accessibility for neurodiverse users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3626252.3630859

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents of disabled students participated in three studies.

    “Parents of disabled students also participated in three studies (e.g., [29]).”
  • Only three papers in the dataset engaged with disability scholarship as a theoretical framing, specifically critical Disability Studies framings such as a social model of disability approach or a disability justice approach.

    “Three papers explicitly engaged with critical Disability Studies framings, specifically taking a social model of disability approach [22, 29] or disability justice approach [37].”
  • These three papers stood out due to the depth of their engagement with the disabled communities they targeted and for how they situated accessibility as an issue of power, identity, and justice, rather than solely one of technical compliance or awareness.

    “These papers stood out due to the depth of their engagement with the disabled communities they targeted [22, 29] and for how they situated accessibility as an issue of power, identity, and justice [22, 37], rather than solely one of technical compliance or awareness.”
  • Systematic approaches to embedding accessibility and diversity in both technology development and computing curricula remain rare.

    “Despite widespread calls for inclusive education, systematic approaches to embedding accessibility and diversity in both technology development and computing curricula remain rare [2, 16, 17, 26].”
  • Authentic collaboration has been associated with motivation, empowerment, and deeper learning.

    “In contrast to empathy exercises that risk superficiality or stereotyping [3], authentic collaboration has been associated with motivation, empowerment, and deeper learning [14, 17, 27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kletenik, D., Minkowitz, R., Peric, A., Sahin, M., & Adler, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Brooklyn College (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
  • Northeastern Illinois University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-03-07
Pages
687-693
OpenAlex
W4392542353
Cited by
9
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • PSC CUNY Grant
  • SIGCSE Special Projects Award
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
neurodiversity, software accessibility, accessibility education, autism spectrum disorder, dyslexia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, accessibility guidelines, usability, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review