The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misgendered During Moderation: How Transgender Bodies Make Visible Cisnormative Content Moderation Policies and Enforcement in a Meta Oversight Board Case
Abstract
Transgender and nonbinary social media users experience disproportionate content removals on social media platforms, even when content does not violate platforms’ guidelines. In 2022, the Oversight Board, which oversees Meta platforms’ content moderation decisions, invited public feedback on Instagram’s removal of two trans users’ posts featuring their bare chests, introducing a unique opportunity to hear trans users’ feedback on how nudity and sexual activity policies impacted them. We conducted a qualitative analysis of 83 comments made public during the Oversight Board’s public comment process. Commenters criticized Meta’s nudity policies as enforcing a cisnormative view of gender while making it unclear how images of trans users’ bodies are moderated, enabling the disproportionate removal of trans content and limiting trans users’ ability to use Meta’s platforms. Yet there was significant divergence among commenters about how to address cisnormative moderation. Some commenters suggested that Meta clarify nudity guidelines, while others suggested that Meta overhaul them entirely, removing gendered distinctions or fundamentally reconfiguring the platform’s relationship to sexual content. We then discuss how the Oversight Board’s public comment process demonstrates the value of incorporating trans people’s feedback while developing policies related to gender and nudity, while arguing that Meta must go beyond only revising policy language by reevaluating how cisnormative valu…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vague platform policies often affect queer and trans users, who experience extensive content removal even when respecting a platform's guidelines.
“These vague policies often affect queer and trans users, who experience extensive content removal even when respecting a platform's guidelines (Haimson et al. 2021;Mayworm, Albert, and Haimson 2024).”
From Staring Back at the Surveillance Gaze: The Resistance of LGBTQ+ Users on Social Media (2026) · cites this paper as Mayworm, Albert, and Haimson 2024
This regime of visibility heightens the scrutiny of queer communities, impacting their possible evolution within counterpublic spaces operating outside the cisheteronormative system.
“This creates a regime of visibility that heightens the scrutiny of queer communities, which greatly impacts their possible evolution within counterpublic spaces operating outside of the cisheternormative system (Haimson et al. 2021;Mayworm, Albert, and Haimson 2024;Monea 2022).”
From Staring Back at the Surveillance Gaze: The Resistance of LGBTQ+ Users on Social Media (2026) · cites this paper as Mayworm, Albert, and Haimson 2024
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136
The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition
Keyes, O. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274357 · Cited by 505
Transgender adolescents’ uses of social media for social support
Selkie, E., Adkins, V., Masters, E., Bajpai, A., & Shumer, D. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.011 · Cited by 256
Scheuerman, M. K., Paul, J. M., & Brubaker, J. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359246 · Cited by 252
Baking Gender Into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers
Bivens, R., & Haimson, O. L. (2016) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305116672486 · Cited by 240
Self-citationSocial Media as Social Transition Machinery
Haimson, O. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274332 · Cited by 175
Self-citationContestability For Content Moderation
Vaccaro, K., Xiao, Z., Hamilton, K., & Karahalios, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476059 · Cited by 77
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.2139/ssrn.3805210 · DOI
- 10.1145/3411764.3445091 · DOI
- 10.1215/23289252-9475495 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444815621527 · DOI
- 10.1080/23268743.2021.1947883 · DOI
- 10.1177/01634437211027106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.03.099 · DOI
- 10.15406/iratj.2017.03.00075 · DOI
- 10.1177/14614448211031031 · DOI
- 10.21428/96c8d426 · DOI
- Michael Ann DeVito. 2022. How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk Theorization. (2022). · DOI
- Natasha Duarte, Emma Llansó, and Anna Loup. 2018. Mixed Messages? The Limits of Automated Social Media Content Analysis. In 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://cdt.org/files/2017/12/FAT-conference-draft-2018.pdf
- Niki Fritz and Amy Gonzales. 2018. Not the normal trans story: negotiating trans narratives while crowdfunding at the margins. International Journal of Communication 12 (2018), 20.
- 10.1177/1461444820912540 · DOI
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2017. Governance of and by platforms. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. SAGE, New York, 30.
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media (illustrated edition ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven.
- GLAAD. 2023. Social Media Safety Index 2023. Technical Report. GLAAD. 44 pages. https://assets.glaad.org/m/7adb1180448da194/original/Social-Media-Safety-Index-2023.pdf
- 10.1177/08912432211029393 · DOI
- 10.1145/3415195 · DOI
- 10.1080/14680777.2019.1678505 · DOI
- 10.1145/3479610 · DOI
- 10.5210/fm.v21i6.6791 · DOI
- 10.1145/3610169 · DOI
- Anna Hoffmann and Anne Jonas. 2016. Recasting Justice for Internet and Online Industry Research Ethics. In Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Cases and Challenges, Michael Zimmer and Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda (Eds.). Peter Lang Publishing, 27.
- 10.1177/01968599211040835 · DOI
- 10.1145/3359294 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11042-022-11968-3 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.3760098 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01486.x · DOI
- Brandeis Marshall. 2021. Algorithmic misogynoir in content moderation practice. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union (June 2021). https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/HBS-e-paper-Algorithmic-Misogynoir-in-Content-Moderation-Practice-200621_FINAL.pdf
- 10.1145/3632741 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/12551.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.33621/jdsr.v5i4.162 · DOI
- 10.1145/3593013.3594078 · DOI · Paper page
- Oversight Board. 2023. Meet The Board. https://www.oversightboard.com/meet-the-board/
- 10.1145/3593013.3594134 · DOI
- Audacia Ray. 2007. Naked on the Internet: hookups, downloads, and cashing in on Internet sexploration. Seal Press, Emeryville, CA. OCLC: ocm82367813.
- Sarah T. Roberts. 2019. Behind the screen: content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press, New Haven. OCLC: on1055263168.
- 10.1080/00918369.2022.2042664 · DOI
- Salty. 2019. Exclusive: An Investigation into Algorithmic Bias in Content Policing on Instagram. https://www.saltyworld.net/algorithmicbiasreport-2/
- 10.1145/3274424 · DOI
- 10.1145/3392866 · DOI · Paper page
- Julia Serano. 2016. Whipping girl: a transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity (second edition ed.). Seal Press, Berkeley, CA. OCLC: ocn920728057.
- Shakira Smith, Oliver L Haimson, Claire Fitzsimmons, and Nikki Echarte Brown. 2021. Censorship of Marginalized Communities on Instagram, 2021. Salty (Sept. 2021). https://saltyworld.net/product/exclusive-report-censorship-of-marginalized-communities-on-instagram-2021-pdf-download/
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trans data epistemologies: Transgender ways of knowing with data
Stevens, N., & Doğan, A. L. (2025) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251381694 · Cited by 4
Trans Data: A Research and Design Agenda from Trans Activists' Transformative Data Science
Doğan, A. L., Stevens, N., & D'Ignazio, C. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757682 · Cited by 2
Staring Back at the Surveillance Gaze: The Resistance of LGBTQ+ Users on Social Media
Chartrand, A. (2026) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v24i3.19225 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayworm, S., Albert, K., & Haimson, O. L.
- Affiliations
- School of Information, University of Michigan, United States of America
- Harvard University, United States of America
- Venue
- The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-06-03
- Pages
- 301-312
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 7
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1942125)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review