Appropriate Incongruity Driven Human-AI Collaborative Tool to Assist Novices in Humorous Content Generation
Open accessAbstract
Creating humorous content has been shown to improve an individual’s emotional well-being by decreasing stress, overcoming anxiety, and enhancing interpersonal relationships. However, it is common knowledge that a good sense of humor is not common. In this paper, we propose a natural language processing (NLP) driven collaborative tool based on appropriate incongruity theory to assist novices in writing humorous content. We use cartoon-caption writing as the use case since it is a popular method where people engage in creating humorous content. The paper describes the design of our co-authoring tool and findings from a two-part user study where (1) 20 participants used our tool to co-author cartoon captions and (2) 66 participants evaluated those captions. Our findings show that the tool helped participants to identify incongruous visual elements in the cartoon, support ideation, and expand the narrative. This resulted in co-authored captions more frequently rated funnier than those written without the tool. This approach can be appropriated to other humor generation applications including creative writing, creating memes, sketch comedy, and advertising.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · see citing works
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533 · see citing works
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · see citing works
Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00051 · Cited by 9,645 · see citing works
Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
Morrow, C. E. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0624 · Cited by 6,166 · see citing works
Brown, T., & Kātz, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x · Cited by 940 · see citing works
ImageBind One Embedding Space to Bind Them All
Girdhar, R., El-Nouby, A., Liu, Z., Singh, M., Alwala, K. V., Joulin, A., & Misra, I. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01457 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610376073 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)
Wentland, W., Knopp, J., Silberer, C., & Härtung, M. (2008) · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination
Steen, M. (2013) · Design Issues · doi:10.1162/desi_a_00207 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour
Dynel, M. (2009) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00152.x · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Distance Weighted Cosine Similarity Measure for Text Classification
Li, B., & Han, L. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_74 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Oh, C., Song, J., Choi, J., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Suh, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174223 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Novice-AI Music Co-Creation via AI-Steering Tools for Deep Generative Models
Louie, R., Coenen, A., Huang, C. Z., Terry, M., & Cai, C. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376739 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity
Forabosco, G. (1992) · Humor - International Journal of Humor Research · doi:10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Lefcourt, H. M. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4287-2 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Promoting emotional well-being through the use of humour.
Crawford, S. A., & Caltabiano, N. J. (2011) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.577087 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Metaphoria: An Algorithmic Companion for Metaphor Creation
Gero, K. I., & Chilton, L. B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300526 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
International scholarly research notices
(n.d.) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · doi:10.1155/2020 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of AI Delegation on Human Task Performance and Task Satisfaction
Hemmer, P., Westphal, M., Schemmer, M., Vetter, S., Vössing, M., & Satzger, G. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584052 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Characterizing Humour: An Exploration of Features in Humorous Texts
Mihalcea, R. F., & Pulman, S. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70939-8_30 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Humor Detection: A Transformer Gets the Last Laugh
Weller, O., & Seppi, K. D. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1372 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval
Schmidt, S. R. (2002) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210143000263 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Writing-Stories: Co-authoring "The Sea Monster," a Writing-Story
Richardson, L. W. (1995) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780049500100203 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Berger, A. A. (1987) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276487030003002 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Shahaf, D., Horvitz, E., & Mankoff, R. (2015) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783388 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Misattribution theory of tendentious humor
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90005-0 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Qi, Y., Chen, J., Xu, X., & Ma, K. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998208 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Crosscast: Adding Visuals to Audio Travel Podcasts
Xia, H., Jacobs, J., & Agrawala, M. (2020) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3379337.3415882 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Towards providing just-in-time vocabulary support for assistive and augmentative communication
Epp, C. D., Djordjevic, J., Wu, S., Moffatt, K., & Baecker, R. M. (2012) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/2166966.2166973 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Walsh, G., & Wronsky, E. (2019) · ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3311957.3359456 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Weber, T., Hußmann, H., Han, Z., Matthes, S., & Liu, Y. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3377325.3377509 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
IdeateRelate: An Examples Gallery That Helps Creators Explore Ideas in Relation to Their Own
Xu, X. (., Xiong, R., Wang, B., Min, D., & Dow, S. P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479496 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Phonetics and Ambiguity Comprehension Gated Attention Network for Humor Recognition
Fan, X., Lin, H., Yang, L., et al. (2020) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2020/2509018 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Yue, S., Yu, C., & Shi, Y. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998306 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Let Everything Turn Well in Your Wife
Valitutti, A., Doucet, A., Toivonen, H. T. T., & Toivanen, J. M. (2013) · HAL · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Managing implicit assumptions in natural language interfaces
Smith, D. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2166966.2167054 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Design for Computer-Mediated Multilingual Communication with AI Support
Lim, H. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3272973.3272982 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [1]1. Issa Annamoradnejad and Gohar Zoghi. 2022. ColBERT: Using BERT Sen- tence Embedding in Parallel Neural Networks for Computational Humor. arXiv:2004.12765 [cs.CL] · arXiv
- [2]2. Arthur Asa Berger. 1987. Humor: an introduction. American Behavioral Scientist 30, 3 (1987), 6-15.
- [3]3. Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, California, USA.
- [8]8. Dmitry Davidov, Oren Tsur, and Ari Rappoport. 2010. Semi-Supervised Recogni- tion of Sarcastic Sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In Proceedings of the Four- teenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (Uppsala, Sweden) (CoNLL '10). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 107-116.
- [17]17. Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, Matthijs Douze, Hérve Jégou, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. FastText.zip: Compressing text classification models. arXiv:1612.03651 [cs.CL] · arXiv
- [18]18. Herbert M Lefcourt. 2001. Humor: The psychology of living buoyantly. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
- [20]20. Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. 2022. BLIP: Bootstrap- ping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, ICML, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 12888-12900.
- [29]29. Elliott Oring. 2010. Engaging humor. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
- [31]31. Radim Řehůřek and Petr Sojka. 2010. Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks. ELRA, Valletta, Malta, 45-50.
- [38]38. Julia M Taylor and Lawrence J Mazlack. 2004. Computationally recognizing wordplay in jokes. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 26. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1315-1320.
- [40]40. Tony Veale. 2004. Incongruity in humor: Root cause or epiphenomenon? HUMOR 17, 4 (2004), 419-428.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process
Reza, M., Thomas-Mitchell, J., Dushniku, P., Laundry, N., Williams, J. J., & Kuzminykh, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757566 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…reviewing (i.e., evaluating and revising text according to established goals), and monitoring (i.e., overseeing, regulating, and coordinating the writer’s cognitive activities, such as deciding when to shift between planning, translating, and reviewing, and ensuring alignment with writing goals).”
Beyond Productivity: Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools
Cox, S. R., Djernæs, H. B., & van Berkel, N. (2025) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3698061.3726924 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Creative Writers' Attitudes on Writing as Training Data for Large Language Models
Gero, K. I., Desai, M., Schnitzler, C., Eom, N., Cushman, J., & Glassman, E. L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713287 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Making the Write Connections: Linking Writing Support Tools with Writer Needs
Zhao, Z., Masson, D., Kim, Y., Penn, G., & Chevalier, F. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713161 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Breckner, K., Neumayr, T., Mara, M., Streit, M., & Augstein, M. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2482742 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems
Carrera, D., Thomas-Mitchell, J., & Wigdor, D. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791952 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…at creative writing, there has been research on new techniques to support story writing [33, 80], playwriting [46], character development [56], prewriting [75], non-linear story writing (also known as ‘multiverse’) [27], worldbuilding [14], cartoon-captioning [35], and feedback generation [4].”
Tracing Creativity: A Design Space For Creative Activity Traces in HCI
Hammad, N., Lin, D. C.-E., Smith, A., Kreminski, M., Harpstead, E., & Hammer, J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791263 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sasaki, Y., Zhang, J., & Shiraishi, Y. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100117
Yuan, Y., Wang, R., Cao, J., Xian, L., Yang, J., & Yarosh, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3799443
Understanding and Designing Technology to Support Mentoring Functions in Chinese Design Teams
Shen, L., Zhang, Z., Wei, Q., Lee, L., Hui, P., & Fan, M. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2651347
Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems
Carrera, D., Thomas-Mitchell, J., & Wigdor, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15440
- Authors
- Kariyawasam, H., Niwarthana, A., Palmer, A., Kay, J., & Withana, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-03-18
- Pages
- 650-659
- OpenAlex
- W4393970590
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DE200100479)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- humor generation, human-AI collaboration, novice writers, creative writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review