Cited by 53D Shape Modeling and AnalysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

ArtiLatent: Realistic Articulated 3D Object Generation via Structured Latents

Chen, Honghua, Lan, Yushi, Chen, Yongwei, Pan, Xingang·2025·Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers

Abstract

We propose ArtiLatent, a generative framework that synthesizes human-made 3D objects with fine-grained geometry, accurate articulation, and realistic appearance. Our approach jointly models part geometry and articulation dynamics by embedding sparse voxel representations and associated articulation properties—including joint type, axis, origin, range, and part category—into a unified latent space via a variational autoencoder. A latent diffusion model is then trained over this space to enable diverse yet physically plausible sampling. To reconstruct photorealistic 3D shapes, we introduce an articulation-aware Gaussian decoder that accounts for articulation-dependent visibility changes (e.g., revealing the interior of a drawer when opened). By conditioning appearance decoding on articulation state, our method assigns plausible texture features to regions that are typically occluded in static poses, significantly improving visual realism across articulation configurations. Extensive experiments on furniture-like objects from PartNet-Mobility and ACD datasets demonstrate that ArtiLatent outperforms existing approaches in geometric consistency and appearance fidelity. Our framework provides a scalable solution for articulated 3D object synthesis and manipulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3757377.3763922

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other methods generate dynamic content or articulated objects, but typically represent motion, rigid-only articulation, or deformation sequences rather than complete skeletal rigs with skinning weights.

    “Other methods generate dynamic content or articulated objects Ren et al. [2023], Wu et al. [2025], Chen et al. [2025], Li et al. [2025], but typically represent motion, rigid-only articulation, or deformation sequences rather than complete skeletal rigs with skinning weights.”

    From Rigel3D: Rig-aware Latents for Animation-Ready 3D Asset Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Chen et al. [2025]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Lan, Y., Chen, Y., & Pan, X.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-12-14
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W7110023195
Cited by
4
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
3.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIGGRAPH Asia Conference Papers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
latent diffusion models, variational autoencoder, joint embedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review