Cited by 633Interactive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface DesignData Visualization and Analytics

Interactive machine learning

Fails, Jerry Alan, Olsen, Dan R.·2003·Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces

Abstract

Perceptual user interfaces (PUIs) are an important part of ubiquitous computing. Creating such interfaces is difficult because of the image and signal processing knowledge required for creating classifiers. We propose an interactive machine-learning (IML) model that allows users to train, classify/view and correct the classifications. The concept and implementation details of IML are discussed and contrasted with classical machine learning models. Evaluations of two algorithms are also presented. We also briefly describe Image Processing with Crayons (Crayons), which is a tool for creating new camera-based interfaces using a simple painting metaphor. The Crayons tool embodies our notions of interactive machine learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/604045.604056

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experts' revision of learned knowledge is an important part of the augmented learning process.

    “The experts' revision of the learned knowledge is therefore an important part of the augmented learning process (Fails & Olsen, 2003).”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Fails & Olsen, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fails, J. A., & Olsen, D. R.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
Publisher
ACM
Published
2003-01-12
Pages
39-45
OpenAlex
W2003238113
Cited by
633
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
interactive machine learning, perceptual user interfaces, ubiquitous computing, image processing, signal processing, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review