CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Race and Racism in Archaeologies of Chinese American Communities

Fong, Kelly N., Ng, Laura W., Lee, Jocelyn, Peterson, Veronica L., Voss, Barbara L.·2022·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-014548
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article provides a critical review of archaeological research that addresses race and racism in Chinese American communities. Future directions for Chinese diaspora archaeologies include employing an Asian American studies praxis that centers community-engaged research, using diasporic frameworks, and applying emic language to naming material culture and identities. Other innovative archaeological scholarship on the racialization of Chinese Americans reframes Chinese American communities as part of larger multiethnic neighborhoods, highlights gender and sexuality, and traces the transpacific connections of Chinese transmigrants. The interventions outlined provide archaeologists who are engaged in the study of the Chinese American past with the pathways needed to begin practicing antiracist Chinese diaspora archaeologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-014548

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other instances, the African American experience of society-wide institutions was shaped by ideologies of race.

    “In other instances, the African American experience of society-wide institutions was shaped by ideologies of race (for more on race, residential segregation, and pluralism in the United States, see Fong et al. 2022, this volume).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Fong et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 122

  1. Allen R, 2002, Excavation of the Woolen Mills Chinatown, CA-SCL-807H, San Jose
  2. Ancheta AN., 2006, Race, Rights, and the Asian American Experience
  3. Anderson K., 1991, Vancouver's Chinatown: Racial Discourse in Canada, 1875–1980, 10.1515/9780773562974 · DOI
  4. Arbor. Chin. Labor Quart. Proj, 2018, Arboretum Chinese Labor Quarters—a collaborative, community-based archaeology project about the history of Chinese workers at Stanford
  5. Atalay S., 2012, Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities
  6. Barna B, 2015, Beyond the Walls: New Perspectives on the Archaeology of Historical Households, 97
  7. Battle-Baptiste W., 2011, Black Feminist Archaeology
  8. 10.1007/978-3-319-51871-8 · DOI
  9. Bonilla-Silva E, 2008, White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology, 3
  10. 10.1525/9780520938748 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/traa.12156 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1205805 · DOI
  13. Chang GH, 2019, The Chinese and the Iron Road Building the Transcontinental Railroad
  14. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816679812.001.0001 · DOI
  15. Chin D., 2009, Seattle's International District: The Making of a Pan-Asian American Community
  16. Cho J, 2004, Revisiting East Adams
  17. Choy PP., 2014, Interpreting “Overseas Chinese” ceramics found on historical archaeology sites: manufacture, marks, classification, and social use
  18. Chung SF, 2005, Chinese American Death Rituals: Respecting the Ancestors, 107
  19. City of Boston, 2020, City of Boston
  20. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C, 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities
  21. Costello JG, 1998, Rice bowls in the Delta: artifacts recovered from the 1915 Asian community of Walnut Grove, California
  22. Crenshaw K., 1989, Univ. Chicago Leg. Forum, 1989, 139
  23. 10.1111/aman.13669 · DOI
  24. Delgado R, 2017, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction
  25. Du Bois WEB, 1897, Atlantic
  26. 10.1007/BF03376636 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fong K, 2015, The Oxford Handbook of Historical Archaeology
  28. Fong KN., 2005, Archaeology and the “rat-eating Chine”: the role of stereotype in Chinese American site analyses
  29. Fong KN., 2013, Excavating Chinese America in the Delta: race and the historical archaeology of the Isleton Chinese American community
  30. Fong KN. 2020. Toward engaged and critical archaeologies of the Chinese diaspora. See Rose & Kennedy 2020, pp. 59–82 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S0003598X00085732 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/20518196.2020.1718408 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
  34. Fuentes E., 2011, KCET
  35. 10.1007/s11759-018-9335-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10761-011-0149-7 · DOI
  37. Ha T-H., 2018, Quartz
  38. 10.1017/aaq.2020.28 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hsu MY., 2000, Dreaming of Gold, Dreaming of Home: Transnationalism and Migration between the United States and South China, 1882–1943
  40. Hsu MY., 2015, The Good Immigrants: How the Yellow Peril Became the Model Minority
  41. 10.1353/jaas.2005.0049 · DOI
  42. Hu-DeHart E., 2015, Keywords for Asian American Studies, 49
  43. Ike N, 2020, SAA Archaeol. Rec., 20, 12
  44. 10.1177/0032329299027001005 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/07409710.2020.1794182 · DOI
  46. Ko J., 2021, Bull. Mus. Far East. Antiq., 82, 1
  47. 10.1007/BF03377104 · DOI
  48. Kurashige S., 2008, The Shifting Grounds of Race: Black and Japanese Americans in the Making of Multiethnic Los Angeles
  49. 10.1007/BF03374233 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Lai C., 2006, Between “blight” and a new world: urban renewal, political mobilization, and the production of spatial scale in San Francisco, 1940–1980
  51. Lee AW., 2001, Picturing Chinatown: Art and Orientalism in San Francisco
  52. Lee C, 2005, Displacements and Diasporas: Asians in the Americas, 23
  53. 10.1353/jaas.2005.0051 · DOI
  54. Lee E., 2015, The Making of Asian America: A History, 10.5040/9798400664441 · DOI
  55. Lee J., 2020, Small town and mining camps: an analysis of Chinese diasporic communities in 19th-century Oregon
  56. Lee RG., 2017, J. Transnatl. Am. Stud., 8
  57. Liu J, 2011, [Yinxin and the Wuyi Qiaoxiang Society]
  58. 10.1215/9780822387992-008 · DOI
  59. Lowman CB., 2019, Imagined Asia: archaeology and museum anthropology of the Chinese diaspora and the Ainu
  60. Lowman CB., 2020, Archaeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 31, 122
  61. Lui MTY., 2005, The Chinatown Trunk Mystery: Murder, Miscegenation, and Other Dangerous Encounters in Turn-of-the-Century New York City
  62. Mabalon DB., 2013, Little Manila Is in the Heart: The Making of the Filipina/o American Community in Stockton, California
  63. 10.1007/BF03376629 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.36650/nexus14.2_105-116_MagalongMabalon · DOI
  65. Massey S, 2013, Down to the last grain of rice: Japantown Senior Apartments
  66. Mazumdar S., 1996, A New Significance: Re-Envisioning the History of the American West, 158
  67. McKeown A., 2001, Chinese Migrant Networks and Cultural Change: Peru, Chicago, and Hawaii, 1900–1936
  68. Molina N., 2006, Fit to Be Citizens? Public Health and Race in Los Angeles, 1879–1939
  69. 10.1007/s41636-017-0006-6 · DOI
  70. Naruta AN., 2006, Creating whiteness in California: racialization processes, land, and policy in the context of California's Chinese exclusion movements, 1850–1910
  71. Ng LW. 2020. Between South China and Southern California: the formation of transnational Chinese communities. See Rose & Kennedy 2020, pp. 234–49 · DOI
  72. Ng LW., 2021, An archaeology of Chinese transnationalism
  73. Odo F, 2017, Finding a Path Forward: Asian American Pacific Islander National Historic Landmarks Theme Study
  74. Omi M, 1994, Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s
  75. 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.661 · DOI
  76. Orser CE, 2007, The Archaeology of Race and Racialization in Historic America
  77. Pascoe P., 1990, Relations of Rescue: The Search for Female Moral Authority in the American West 1874–1939, 10.1093/oso/9780195060089.001.0001 · DOI
  78. Peffer GA., 1999, If They Don't Bring Their Women Here: Chinese Female Immigration before Exclusion
  79. Peterson V., 2019, SAPIENS
  80. Pierson D., 2006, LA Times
  81. 10.1007/BF03373616 · DOI
  82. Praetzellis M, 2004, Putting the “there” there: historical archaeologies of West Oakland
  83. 10.1177/0096144214537200 · DOI
  84. Ritchie NA., 2003, Australas. Hist. Archaeol., 21, 4
  85. 10.5744/florida/9780813066356.001.0001 · DOI
  86. Ross DE., 2013, Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, 5675
  87. Ross DE. 2020. Reframing Overseas Chinese archaeology as archaeology of the Chinese diaspora. See Rose & Kennedy 2020, pp. 35–58 · DOI
  88. Sagara MR., 2014, Chin. Am. Hist. Perspect., 2014, 1
  89. Said EW., 1979, Orientalism
  90. Sando RA, 1993, Hidden Heritage: Historical Archaeology of the Overseas Chinese, 151
  91. Shah N., 2001, Contagious Divides: Epidemics and Race in San Francisco's Chinatown
  92. Shah N., 2011, Stranger Intimacy: Contesting Race, Sexuality, and the Law in the North American West
  93. Smith LT., 2012, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
  94. 10.1007/978-0-387-72071-5_20 · DOI
  95. 10.1007/BF03376960 · DOI
  96. 10.1007/s10761-015-0294-5 · DOI
  97. 10.2307/j.ctv17mrv0m · DOI
  98. 10.1017/9781108776400 · DOI
  99. Tan J, 2013, The culture of Lu Mansion architecture in China's Kaiping County, 1900–1949
  100. Tan J, 2013, [Research on the Ornamentation of Kaiping Diaolou and Its Associated Villages]
  101. Tchen JKW., 1999, New York before Chinatown: Orientalism and the Shaping of American Culture, 1776–1882, 10.56021/9780801860065 · DOI
  102. Ting J, 1995, Privileging Positions: The Sites of Asian American Studies, 271
  103. Tong B., 1994, Unsubmissive Women: Chinese Prostitutes in Nineteenth-Century San Francisco
  104. Trouillot M-R., 2015, Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History
  105. 10.1080/00438240500168491 · DOI
  106. 10.1007/BF03377098 · DOI
  107. 10.1007/BF03376953 · DOI
  108. 10.1086/697945 · DOI
  109. 10.1353/jaas.2018.0004 · DOI
  110. Voss BL. 2020. Interethnic relationships in nineteenth-century Chinatowns: new perspectives from archaeological research and missionary women's writings. See Rose & Kennedy 2020, pp. 109–38 · DOI
  111. 10.1017/aaq.2020.118 · DOI
  112. 10.1007/BF03377096 · DOI
  113. 10.1017/aaq.2018.16 · DOI · Paper page
  114. Voss BL, 2013, Chin. Am. Hist. Perspect., 2013, 63
  115. 10.1525/9780520941762 · DOI
  116. 10.1007/BF03377099 · DOI · Paper page
  117. 10.1007/BF03377095 · DOI
  118. Yu CY., 2001, Chinatown, San Jose, USA
  119. Yu H., 2001, Thinking Orientals: Migration, Contact, and Exoticism in Modern America, 10.1093/oso/9780195116601.001.0001 · DOI
  120. Yu H, 2011, Connecting Seas and Connected Ocean Rims: Indian, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans and China Seas Migrations from the 1830s to the 1930s, 393, 10.1163/ej.9789004193161.i-552.105 · DOI
  121. 10.1525/9780520915350 · DOI
  122. 10.1525/9780520922877 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fong, K. N., Ng, L. W., Lee, J., Peterson, V. L., & Voss, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Asian American Studies Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA;
  • Anthropology Department, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa, USA;
  • Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA;,
  • Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA;
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2022-10-24
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
233-250
ISSN
  • 0084-6570
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-014548
Cited by
17
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review