The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Symmetry in Membrane Proteins
Abstract
Symmetry is a common feature among natural systems, including protein structures. A strong propensity toward symmetric architectures has long been recognized for water-soluble proteins, and this propensity has been rationalized from an evolutionary standpoint. Proteins residing in cellular membranes, however, have traditionally been less amenable to structural studies, and thus the prevalence and significance of symmetry in this important class of molecules is not as well understood. In the past two decades, researchers have made great strides in this area, and these advances have provided exciting insights into the range of architectures adopted by membrane proteins. These structural studies have revealed a similarly strong bias toward symmetric arrangements, which were often unexpected and which occurred despite the restrictions imposed by the membrane environment on the possible symmetry groups. Moreover, membrane proteins disproportionately contain internal structural repeats resulting from duplication and fusion of smaller segments. This article discusses the types and origins of symmetry in membrane proteins and the implications of symmetry for protein function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many other diverse membrane protein folds share this construction, which presumably arose from the duplication and fusion of a primal homodimer (69, 70).”
From Membrane exporters of fluoride ion (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure of P-Glycoprotein Reveals a Molecular Basis for Poly-Specific Drug Binding
Aller, S. G., Yu, J., Ward, A., Weng, Y., Chittaboina, S., Zhuo, R., Harrell, P. M., Trinh, Y. T., Zhang, Q., Urbatsch, I. L., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168750 · Cited by 1,929
Crystal structure of the entire respiratory complex I
Baradaran, R., Berrisford, J. M., Minhas, G. S., & Sazanov, L. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11871 · Cited by 797
3D domain swapping: As domains continue to swap
Liu, Y., & Eisenberg, D. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0201402 · Cited by 684
Structure of the membrane domain of respiratory complex I
Efremov, R. G., & Sazanov, L. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10330 · Cited by 370
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 163
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.031 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-7-50 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0807576105 · DOI
- 10.1038/35048692 · DOI · Paper page
- Arseniev AS, 1986, Biol. Membr., 3, 1077
- 10.1016/j.str.2007.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1077945 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.035 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M709202200 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1228655 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.04.084 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002353 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/13/8/085016 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09731 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09939 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1252043 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09487 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0709387104 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21656 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0908570106 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09406 · DOI
- 24. Davies KM, Anselmi C, Wittig I, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Kühlbrandt W. 2012. Structure of the yeast F1FO-ATP synthase dimer and its role in shaping the mitochondrial cristae. PNAS 109:13602–7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05155 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0810286106 · DOI
- 10.1038/318618a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05267 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.280.5360.69 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13205 · DOI
- 10.1038/415287a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.03145 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M114.571935 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08146 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08201 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1150755 · DOI
- 10.1124/pr.113.008052 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1144346 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.072 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1228465 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.014 · DOI
- 10.1152/physiol.00030.2009 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0804659105 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.143.2.391 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04321 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02503 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature01109 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14256 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06093 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09408 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.510 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06717 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1195591 · DOI
- Hirai T, 2002, Nat. Struct. Biol., 9, 597
- 10.1038/nsmb.2267 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05626 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2158 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001911 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.034 · DOI
- 10.1038/376660a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.2909 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/211969a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06163 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10882 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01129-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1319156111 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1251915 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08198 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1222505 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1101952 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi101256x · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10737 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13167 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature08558 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020155 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12179 · DOI
- 10.4161/cam.4.2.10725 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11801 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1215759 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03311 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10963 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0307330101 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02373 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10151 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2008.0125 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1071142 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09885 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1143748 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.178101 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04642 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.276.5309.131 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07869 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90337-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11542 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj494 · DOI
- 108. Marsh JA, Teichmann SA. 2015. Structure, dynamics, assembly, and evolution of protein complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. In press. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034142 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms6286 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139003704.013 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13603 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00249-009-0546-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.016 · DOI
- 10.1006/jsbi.1999.4177 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature01748 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep02909 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11744 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature08026 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05076 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13197 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-159 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06264 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01823.x · DOI
- Pao SS, 1998, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 62, 1, 10.1128/MMBR.62.1.1-34.1998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature10238 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02056 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.457 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm2646 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07819 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08616 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11683 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.280.5369.1596 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80648-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi0359628 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7824948 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.336446 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi000436r · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08624 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1214739110 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.274.5294.1859 · DOI
- Stockbridge RB, 2013, eLIFE, 2, e01084, 10.7554/eLife.01084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11684 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1248571 · DOI
- 10.1038/35015017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.028 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki002 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdg611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02218 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST0380879 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033583510000041 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12233 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08610 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05255 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1011099107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb1206-1049 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb1179 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.277.5322.60 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13670 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03978 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1259723 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03018 · DOI
- 10.1085/jgp.103.2.321 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Best Practices for Preparing a Single Cell Suspension from Solid Tissues for Flow Cytometry
Reichard, A., & Asosingh, K. (2019) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.23690 · Cited by 201
Membrane exporters of fluoride ion
McIlwain, B. C., Ruprecht, M. T., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2021) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-071520-112507 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Forrest, L. R.
- Affiliations
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Porter Neuroscience Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20852;
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-06-22
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 311-337
- ISSN
- 1936-122X
- 1936-1238
- PMC
- PMC5500171
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review