Cited by 310Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research

Open access
Zuo, Xi-Nian, Xu, Ting, Milham, Michael Peter·2019·Nature Human Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-019-0655-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuo, X.-N., Xu, T., & Milham, M. P.
Affiliations
  • South China Normal University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Zuo, Xi-Nian
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
768-771
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953739743
Cited by
310
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
30.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
measurement reliability, neuroimaging, individual differences, biomarkers, sample size, reliability improvement
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurosciences, Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size, Neuroimaging, Functional Neuroimaging, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review