Cited by 492Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Realizing the Mass Public Benefit of Evidence-Based Psychological Therapies: The IAPT Program

Open access
Clark, David M.·2018·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Empirically supported psychological therapies have been developed for many mental health conditions. However, in most countries only a small proportion of the public benefit from these advances. The English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) program aims to bridge the gap between research and practice by training over 10,500 new psychological therapists in empirically supported treatments and deploying them in new services for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. Currently IAPT treats over 560,000 patients per year, obtains clinical outcome data on 98.5% of these individuals, and places this information in the public domain. Around 50% of patients treated in IAPT services recover, and two-thirds show worthwhile benefits. The clinical and economic arguments on which IAPT is based are presented, along with details of the service model, how the program was implemented, and recent findings about service organization. Limitations and future directions are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084833

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Griffiths S, 2013, J. Psychol. Ther. Primary Care, 2, 133
  2. Layard R, 2014, Thrive: How Better Mental Health Care Transforms Lives and Saves Money
  3. Mental Health Found., Mind, Rethink, Salisbury Centre Mental Health, and Young Minds, 2006, We need to talk: the case for psychological therapy in the NHS
  4. NHS Digit, 2015, Psychological Therapies: Annual Report on the Use of IAPT Services—England, 2014/15
  5. NHS Digit, 2016, Psychological Therapies: Annual Report on the Use of IAPT Services—England, 2015–16
  6. NHS Engl, 2015, 2015 adult IAPT workforce census report
  7. NHS Engl, 2016, Implementing the five year forward view for mental health
  8. Pimm J, 2016, Plan, do, study, act: a methodology for enhancing recovery in your service
  9. Roth A, 2005, What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–491 of 491

Metadata

Authors
Clark, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Clark, David M.
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2018-05-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
159-183
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2784464703
Cited by
492
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 10
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (200796/Z/16/Z, 069777)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, depression treatment, anxiety disorders, access to mental health care, therapist training, research-practice gap, service organizations, public mental health services
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, England, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychotherapy, Program Development, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review