The DOI matches its Crossref record; 197 of the 197 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play
Open accessAbstract
Superconducting qubits are leading candidates in the race to build a quantum computer capable of realizing computations beyond the reach of modern supercomputers. The superconducting qubit modality has been used to demonstrate prototype algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) technology era, in which non-error-corrected qubits are used to implement quantum simulations and quantum algorithms. With the recent demonstrations of multiple high-fidelity, two-qubit gates as well as operations on logical qubits in extensible superconducting qubit systems, this modality also holds promise for the longer-term goal of building larger-scale error-corrected quantum computers. In this brief review, we discuss several of the recent experimental advances in qubit hardware, gate implementations, readout capabilities, early NISQ algorithm implementations, and quantum error correction using superconducting qubits. Although continued work on many aspects of this technology is certainly necessary, the pace of both conceptual and technical progress in recent years has been impressive, and here we hope to convey the excitement stemming from this progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Not all cavity EO devices use this coupled-ring-resonator approach; other designs exploit neighboring longitudinal [264] or transverse [190,262,265] optical modes of a single optical resonator, but the principle of operation is the same.”
From Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate (2021) · cites this paper as [264]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations
Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.150502 · Cited by 3,325
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059
Blais, A., Huang, R.-S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062320 · Cited by 2,989
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932
Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces
Havlíček, V., Córcoles, A. D., Temme, K., Harrow, A. W., Kandala, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 · Cited by 2,572
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model
Kadowaki, T., & Nishimori, H. (1998) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.58.5355 · Cited by 2,339
A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits
Krantz, P., Kjærgaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5089550 · Cited by 2,321
Self-citationSuperconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook
Devoret, M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231930 · Cited by 2,197
Clarke, J. L., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07128 · Cited by 2,129
Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification
Clerk, A. A., Devoret, M., Girvin, S. M., Marquardt, F., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1155 · Cited by 2,090
Quantum annealing with manufactured spins
Johnson, M. W., Amin, M. H. S., Gildert, S., Lanting, T., Hamze, F., Dickson, N., Harris, R., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Bunyk, P., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10012 · Cited by 1,891
Self-citationA Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.4028 · Cited by 1,789
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13171 · Cited by 1,733
Mitarai, K., Negoro, M., Kitagawa, M., & Fujii, K. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032309 · Cited by 1,639
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit
Vion, D., Aassime, A., Cottet, A., Joyez, P., Pothier, H., Urbina, C., Esteve, D., & Devoret, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069372 · Cited by 1,624
Encoding a qubit in an oscillator
Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A., & Preskill, J. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012310 · Cited by 1,532
Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies
Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J., & Head-Gordon, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113479 · Cited by 1,418
Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit
Mooij, J. E., Orlando, T. P., Levitov, L. S., Tian, L., van der Wal, C. H., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1036 · Cited by 1,356
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X. Q., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,337
Coherent Quantum Dynamics of a Superconducting Flux Qubit
Chiorescu, I., Nakamura, Y., Harmans, C. J. P. M., & Mooij, J. E. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1081045 · Cited by 1,217
Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor
DiCarlo, L., Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J., Bishop, L. S., Johnson, B., Schuster, D., Majer, J., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08121 · Cited by 1,189
Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., Bremner, M. J., Martinis, J. M., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · Cited by 1,175
Equations-of-Motion Method and the Extended Shell Model
ROWE, D. J. (1968) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.40.153 · Cited by 1,132
Paik, H., Schuster, D., Bishop, L. S., Kirchmair, G., Catelani, G., Sears, A., Johnson, B., Reagor, M. J., Frunzio, L., Glazman, L. I., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.240501 · Cited by 1,097
Quantum algorithms: an overview
Montanaro, A. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2015.23 · Cited by 1,071
On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits
Houck, A. A., Türeci, H. E., & Koch, J. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2251 · Cited by 1,069
Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review
Wendin, G. P. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a · Cited by 1,022
Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits
Ofek, N., Petrenko, A., Heeres, R., Reinhold, P., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Liu, Y., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., Jiang, L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18949 · Cited by 941
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.160501 · Cited by 935
State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit
Kelly, J., Barends, R., Fowler, A. G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E. R., White, T., Sank, D., Mutus, J., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14270 · Cited by 933
Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J. S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1994 · Cited by 888
Self-citationBuluta, I., & Nori, F. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177838 · Cited by 876
Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit
Schuster, D., Houck, A., Schreier, J. A., Wallraff, A. J., Gambetta, J., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Majer, J., Johnson, B., Devoret, M., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05461 · Cited by 869
Fluxonium: Single Cooper-Pair Circuit Free of Charge Offsets
Manucharyan, V., Koch, J., Glazman, L. I., & Devoret, M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1175552 · Cited by 848
Suzuki, M. (1990) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90962-n · Cited by 842
A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier
Macklin, C., O’Brien, K. P., Hover, D. J., Schwartz, M. E., Bolkhovsky, V., Zhang, X., Oliver, W. D., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525 · Cited by 826
Self-citationSimple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits
Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J. M., Rebentrost, P., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.110501 · Cited by 814
Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504 · Cited by 797
Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., Chen, Y., Yin, Y., Chiaro, B., Mutus, J., Neill, C., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.080502 · Cited by 779
Superconducting persistent-current qubit
Orlando, T. P., Mooij, J. E., Tian, L., van der Wal, C. H., Levitov, L. S., Lloyd, S., & Mazo, J. J. (1999) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.15398 · Cited by 750
Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices
Moll, N., Barkoutsos, P., Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Cross, A., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S., Fuhrer, A., Gambetta, J. M., Ganzhorn, M., et al. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aab822 · Cited by 744
Forn-Díaz, P., Lisenfeld, J., Marcos, D., García‐Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E., Harmans, C. J. P. M., & Mooij, J. E. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.237001 · Cited by 723
Quantum computational supremacy
Harrow, A. W., & Montanaro, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23458 · Cited by 702
Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime
Yoshihara, F., Fuse, T., Ashhab, S., Kakuyanagi, K., Saito, S., & Semba, K. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3906 · Cited by 671
Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system
Gambetta, J., Chow, J. M., & Steffen, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0 · Cited by 669
Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schrödinger Cat States
Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Leghtas, Z., Nigg, S. E., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., Mirrahimi, M., Devoret, M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243289 · Cited by 657
Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation
Mirrahimi, M., Leghtas, Z., Albert, V. V., Touzard, S., Schoelkopf, R. J., Jiang, L., & Devoret, M. H. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 · Cited by 639
Efficient Z gates for quantum computing
McKay, D. C., Wood, C. J., Sheldon, S., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.022330 · Cited by 614
The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility
Yan, F., Gustavsson, S., Kamal, A., Birenbaum, J., Sears, A., Hover, D. J., Gudmundsen, T., Rosenberg, D., Samach, G., Weber, S. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12964 · Cited by 605
Self-citationDefining and detecting quantum speedup
Rønnow, T. F., Wang, Z., Job, J., Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Wecker, D., Martinis, J. M., Lidar, D. A., & Troyer, M. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1252319 · Cited by 601
Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
Reed, M. D., DiCarlo, L., Nigg, S. E., Sun, L., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10786 · Cited by 601
Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors
Farhi, E., & Neven, H. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.06002 · Cited by 598
Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation
Campbell, E. T., Terhal, B. M., & Vuillot, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23460 · Cited by 596
Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms
Rigetti, C. T., Gambetta, J., Poletto, S., Plourde, B. L. T., Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Smolin, J. A., Merkel, S., Rozen, J., Keefe, G., et al. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.100506 · Cited by 592
Qubit Architecture with High Coherence and Fast Tunable Coupling
Chen, Y., Neill, C., Roushan, P., Leung, N., Fang, M., Barends, R., Kelly, J., Campbell, B., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.220502 · Cited by 591
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
Ciliberto, C., Herbster, M., Ialongo, A. D., Pontil, M., Rocchetto, A., Severini, S., & Wossnig, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0551 · Cited by 518
Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states
McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J., & de Jong, W. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042308 · Cited by 516
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539799359385 · Cited by 513
Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synthetic magnetic field
Roushan, P., Neill, C., Megrant, A., Chen, Y., Babbush, R., Barends, R., Campbell, B., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3930 · Cited by 508
Perspectives of quantum annealing: methods and implementations
Hauke, P., Katzgraber, H. G., Lechner, W., Nishimori, H., & Oliver, W. D. (2020) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab85b8 · Cited by 507
Self-citationControlling the Spontaneous Emission of a Superconducting Transmon Qubit
Houck, A. A., Schreier, J. A., Johnson, B. R., Chow, J. M., Koch, J., Gambetta, J. M., Schuster, D. I., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.080502 · Cited by 501
Corcoles, A. D., Magesan, E., Srinivasan, S. J., Cross, A. W., Steffen, M., Gambetta, J., & Chow, J. M. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7979 · Cited by 495
Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate
Sheldon, S., Magesan, E., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.060302 · Cited by 491
Forn-Díaz, P., García‐Ripoll, J. J., Peropadre, B., Orgiazzi, J.-L., Yurtalan, M. A., Belyansky, R., Wilson, C. M., & Lupaşcu, A. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3905 · Cited by 490
Flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifier
Yamamoto, T., Inomata, K., 渡部, 道., Matsuba, K., Miyazaki, T., Oliver, W. D., Nakamura, Y., & Tsai, J. S. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2964182 · Cited by 486
Self-citationDigitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit
Barends, R., Shabani, A., Lamata, L., Kelly, J., Mezzacapo, A., Heras, U. L., Babbush, R., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17658 · Cited by 474
Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping
Cochrane, P. T., Milburn, G. J., & Munro, W. J. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.2631 · Cited by 470
A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits
Neill, C., Roushan, P., Kechedzhi, K., Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V., Megrant, A., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Arya, K., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao4309 · Cited by 468
Simple All-Microwave Entangling Gate for Fixed-Frequency Superconducting Qubits
Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Gambetta, J., Rigetti, C. T., Johnson, B., Smolin, J. A., Rozen, J., Keefe, G., Rothwell, M. B., Ketchen, M. B., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.080502 · Cited by 463
Spectroscopic signatures of localization with interacting photons in superconducting qubits
Roushan, P., Neill, C., Tangpanitanon, J., Bastidas, V. M., Megrant, A., Barends, R., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao1401 · Cited by 460
Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting
Gambetta, J., Blais, A., Schuster, D., Wallraff, A. J., Frunzio, L., Majer, J., Devoret, M., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.042318 · Cited by 443
Semiconductor-Nanowire-Based Superconducting Qubit
Larsen, T. W., Petersson, K. D., Kuemmeth, F., Jespersen, T. S., Krogstrup, P., Nygård, J., & Marcus, C. M. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.127001 · Cited by 439
Tunable Coupling Scheme for Implementing High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates
Yan, F., Krantz, P., Sung, Y., Kjaergaard, M., Campbell, D. L., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054062 · Cited by 423
Self-citationGeneration of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits
Neeley, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lenander, M., Lucero, E. A., Mariantoni, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wang, H., Weides, M. P., Wenner, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09418 · Cited by 415
Method for Direct Measurement of the Wigner Function in Cavity QED and Ion Traps
Lutterbach, L. G., & Davidovich, L. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2547 · Cited by 399
Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2008) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734479 · Cited by 395
Quantum memory with millisecond coherence in circuit QED
Reagor, M., Pfaff, W., Axline, C., Heeres, R. W., Ofek, N., Sliwa, K., Holland, E., Wang, C., Blumoff, J., Chou, K., et al. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.014506 · Cited by 376
A Schrödinger cat living in two boxes
Wang, C., Gao, Y. Y., Reinhold, P., Heeres, R., Ofek, N., Chou, K., Axline, C. J., Reagor, M. J., Blumoff, J., Sliwa, K., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2941 · Cited by 357
A dissipatively stabilized Mott insulator of photons
Ma, R., Saxberg, B., Owens, C., Leung, N., Lu, Y., Simon, J., & Schuster, D. I. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0897-9 · Cited by 352
Digital quantum simulation of fermionic models with a superconducting circuit
Barends, R., Lamata, L., Kelly, J., García-Álvarez, L., Fowler, A. G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E. R., White, T., Sank, D., Mutus, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8654 · Cited by 347
Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles
Pop, I. M., Geerlings, K., Catelani, G., Schoelkopf, R. J., Glazman, L. I., & Devoret, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13017 · Cited by 338
Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits
King, A. D., Carrasquilla, J., Raymond, J., Ozfidan, I., Andriyash, E., Berkley, A. J., Reis, M., Lanting, T. M., Harris, R., Altomare, F., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0410-x · Cited by 329
Fast reset and suppressing spontaneous emission of a superconducting qubit
Reed, M. D., Johnson, B. R., Houck, A., DiCarlo, L., Chow, J. M., Schuster, D., Frunzio, L., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3435463 · Cited by 327
Charge Echo in a Cooper-Pair Box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.047901 · Cited by 322
Quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit
Hu, L., Ma, Y., Cai, W., Mu, X., Xu, Y., Wang, W., Wu, Y., Wang, H., Song, Y. P., Zou, C.-L., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0414-3 · Cited by 322
Materials in superconducting quantum bits
Oliver, W. D., & Welander, P. B. (2013) · MRS Bulletin · doi:10.1557/mrs.2013.229 · Cited by 321
Self-citationUniversal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus
McKay, D. C., Filipp, S., Mezzacapo, A., Magesan, E., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2016) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.064007 · Cited by 321
Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise
Tomita, Y., & Svore, K. M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.062320 · Cited by 314
Dephasing of a Superconducting Qubit Induced by Photon Noise
Bertet, P., Chiorescu, I., Burkard, G., Semba, K., Harmans, C. J. P. M., Divincenzo, D. P., & Mooij, J. E. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.257002 · Cited by 314
Computing prime factors with a Josephson phase qubit quantum processor
Lucero, E., Barends, R., Chen, Y., Kelly, J., Mariantoni, M., Megrant, A., O’Malley, P., Sank, D., Vainsencher, A., Wenner, J., et al. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2385 · Cited by 311
Implementing a universal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator
Heeres, R., Reinhold, P., Ofek, N., Frunzio, L., Jiang, L., Devoret, M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00045-1 · Cited by 309
Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier
Preskill, J. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.5813 · Cited by 308
3D integrated superconducting qubits
Rosenberg, D., Kim, D. K., Das, R. N., Yost, D., Gustavsson, S., Hover, D. J., Krantz, P., Melville, A. J., Racz, L. M., Samach, G., et al. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0044-0 · Cited by 298
Self-citationDemonstration of universal parametric entangling gates on a multi-qubit lattice
Reagor, M. J., Osborn, C. B., Tezak, N., Staley, A., Prawiroatmodjo, G. E. D. K., Scheer, M. G., Alidoust, N., Sete, E. A., Didier, N., Silva, M. P. D., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao3603 · Cited by 298
Deterministic teleportation of a quantum gate between two logical qubits
Chou, K. S., Blumoff, J., Wang, C. S., Reinhold, P., Axline, C. J., Gao, Y. Y., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M., Jiang, L., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0470-y · Cited by 291
Single-shot qubit readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics
Mallet, F., Ong, F. R., Palacios-Laloy, A., Nguyen, F., Bertet, P., Vion, D., & Esteve, D. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1400 · Cited by 288
Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric
Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J., Magesan, E., Abraham, D. W., Cross, A. W., Johnson, B., Masluk, N. A., Ryan, C. A., Smolin, J. A., Srinivasan, S. J., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5015 · Cited by 284
de Lange, G., van Heck, B., Bruno, A., van Woerkom, D. J., Geresdi, A., Plissard, S., Bakkers, E. P. A. M., Akhmerov, A., & DiCarlo, L. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.127002 · Cited by 279
Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements
Sun, L., Petrenko, A., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Sliwa, K., Narla, A., Hatridge, M., Shankar, S., Blumoff, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13436 · Cited by 277
You, J. Q., Hu, X., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.140515 · Cited by 267
Improved superconducting qubit coherence using titanium nitride
Chang, J. B., Vissers, M. R., Córcoles, A. D., Sandberg, M., Gao, J., Abraham, D. W., Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J. M., Rothwell, M. B., Keefe, G. A., et al. (2013) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4813269 · Cited by 265
Strongly correlated quantum walks with a 12-qubit superconducting processor
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y.-R., Gong, M., Wu, Y., Zheng, Y., Li, S., Wang, C., Liang, F., Lin, J., Xu, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1611 · Cited by 264
Unsupervised Machine Learning on a Hybrid Quantum Computer
Otterbach, J. S., Manenti, R., Alidoust, N., Bestwick, A., Block, M., Bloom, B., Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Fried, E. S., Hong, S., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.05771 · Cited by 263
Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
Kelly, J., Barends, R., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Fowler, A. G., Hoi, I.-C., Jeffrey, E. R., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.240504 · Cited by 257
Phase transitions in a programmable quantum spin glass simulator
Harris, R., Sato, Y., Berkley, A. J., Reis, M., Altomare, F., Amin, M. H. S., Boothby, K., Bunyk, P., Deng, C., Enderud, C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat2025 · Cited by 257
Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements
Ristè, D., Poletto, S., Huang, M.-Z., Bruno, A., Vesterinen, V., Saira, O.-P., & DiCarlo, L. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7983 · Cited by 254
On-demand quantum state transfer and entanglement between remote microwave cavity memories
Axline, C. J., Burkhart, L., Pfaff, W., Zhang, M., Chou, K., Campagne-Ibarcq, P., Reinhold, P., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., Jiang, L., et al. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0115-y · Cited by 251
Observation of 4.2-K equilibrium-noise squeezing via a Josephson-parametric amplifier
Yurke, B., Kaminsky, P. G., Miller, R. E., Whittaker, E. A., Smith, A. D., Silver, A. H., & Simon, R. W. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.60.764 · Cited by 246
Superconducting gatemon qubit based on a proximitized two-dimensional electron gas
Casparis, L., Connolly, M. R., Kjærgaard, M., Pearson, N., Kringhøj, A., Larsen, T. W., Kuemmeth, F., Wang, T., Thomas, C., Gronin, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0207-y · Cited by 240
Cavity State Manipulation Using Photon-Number Selective Phase Gates
Heeres, R., Vlastakis, B., Holland, E. C., Krastanov, S., Albert, V. V., Frunzio, L., Jiang, L., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.137002 · Cited by 237
Invited Review Article: The Josephson bifurcation amplifier
Vijay, R., Devoret, M., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2009) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.3224703 · Cited by 236
Computational multiqubit tunnelling in programmable quantum annealers
Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V., Shabani, A., Isakov, S. V., Dykman, M. I., Denchev, V. S., Amin, M. H. S., Smirnov, A. Y., Mohseni, M., & Neven, H. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10327 · Cited by 232
Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits
Takita, M., Cross, A. W., Córcoles, A. D., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180501 · Cited by 228
Reaching 10 ms single photon lifetimes for superconducting aluminum cavities
Reagor, M., Paik, H., Catelani, G., Sun, L., Axline, C. J., Holland, E., Pop, I. M., Masluk, N. A., Brecht, T., Frunzio, L., et al. (2013) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4807015 · Cited by 212
Parametrically Activated Entangling Gates Using Transmon Qubits
Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Ryan, C. A., Sete, E. A., Hudson, A., Karalekas, P. J., Manenti, R., Silva, M. P. D., Sinclair, R., Acala, E., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.034050 · Cited by 212
Scalable Quantum Circuit and Control for a Superconducting Surface Code
Versluis, R., Poletto, S., Khammassi, N., Tarasinski, B., Haider, N., Michalak, D. J., Bruno, A., Bertels, K., & DiCarlo, L. (2017) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.8.034021 · Cited by 209
Demonstration of quantum advantage in machine learning
Ristè, D., Silva, M. P. D., Ryan, C. A., Cross, A. W., Córcoles, A. D., Smolin, J. A., Gambetta, J. M., Chow, J. M., & Johnson, B. R. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0017-3 · Cited by 208
Experimentally simulating the dynamics of quantum light and matter at deep-strong coupling
Langford, N. K., Sagastizabal, R., Kounalakis, M., Dickel, C., Bruno, A., Luthi, F., Thoen, D. J., Endo, A., & DiCarlo, L. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01061-x · Cited by 203
Chemical basis of Trotter-Suzuki errors in quantum chemistry simulation
Babbush, R., McClean, J., Wecker, D., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Wiebe, N. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022311 · Cited by 199
Demonstration of Weight-Four Parity Measurements in the Surface Code Architecture
Takita, M., Corcoles, A. D., Magesan, E., Abdo, B., Brink, M., Cross, A. W., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.210505 · Cited by 198
Protected gates for superconducting qubits
Brooks, P., Kitaev, A., & Preskill, J. P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.052306 · Cited by 195
Quantum Annealing for Prime Factorization
Jiang, S., Britt, K. A., McCaskey, A., Humble, T. S., & Kais, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36058-z · Cited by 194
Strong environmental coupling in a Josephson parametric amplifier
Mutus, J. Y., White, T. C., Barends, R., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Jeffrey, E., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., et al. (2014) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4886408 · Cited by 189
Universal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit
Krastanov, S., Albert, V. V., Shen, C., Zou, C., Heeres, R., Vlastakis, B., Schoelkopf, R. J., & Jiang, L. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.040303 · Cited by 188
Thermal and Residual Excited-State Population in a 3D Transmon Qubit
Jin, X., Kamal, A., Sears, A., Gudmundsen, T., Hover, D. J., Miloshi, J., Slattery, R. L., Yan, F., Yoder, J., Orlando, T. P., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.240501 · Cited by 185
Self-citationBroadband parametric amplification with impedance engineering: Beyond the gain-bandwidth product
Roy, T., Kundu, S., Chand, M., Vadiraj, A. M., Ranadive, A., Nehra, N., Patankar, M. P., Aumentado, J., Clerk, A. A., & Vijay, R. (2015) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4939148 · Cited by 184
Wang, J. I.-J., Rodan‐Legrain, D., Bretheau, L., Campbell, D. L., Kannan, B., Kim, D. K., Kjærgaard, M., Krantz, P., Samach, G., Yan, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0329-2 · Cited by 176
Self-citationFault-tolerant detection of a quantum error
Rosenblum, S., Reinhold, P., Mirrahimi, M., Jiang, L., Frunzio, L., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat3996 · Cited by 174
Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime
Braumüller, J., Marthaler, M., Schneider, A., Stehli, A., Rotzinger, H., Weides, M. P., & Ustinov, A. V. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00894-w · Cited by 170
Self-citationMeasurement of the Decay of Fock States in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit
Wang, H., Hofheinz, M., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lucero, E. A., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wenner, J., Cleland, A. N., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.240401 · Cited by 168
Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking
Sheldon, S., Bishop, L. S., Magesan, E., Filipp, S., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.012301 · Cited by 161
Fault-Tolerant Logical Gates in the IBM Quantum Experience
Harper, R., & Flammia, S. T. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.080504 · Cited by 155
Gate-Efficient Simulation of Molecular Eigenstates on a Quantum Computer
Ganzhorn, M., Egger, D. J., Barkoutsos, P., Ollitrault, P. J., Salis, G., Moll, N., Roth, M., Fuhrer, A., Mueller, P., Woerner, S., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.044092 · Cited by 152
Poletto, S., Gambetta, J., Merkel, S., Smolin, J. A., Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Keefe, G., Rothwell, M. B., Rozen, J., Abraham, D. W., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.240505 · Cited by 149
Experimental Demonstration of a Resonator-Induced Phase Gate in a Multiqubit Circuit-QED System
Paik, H., Mezzacapo, A., Sandberg, M., McClure, D., Abdo, B., Corcoles, A. D., Dial, O., Bogorin, D. F., Plourde, B. L. T., Steffen, M., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.250502 · Cited by 142
Entanglement of bosonic modes through an engineered exchange interaction
Gao, Y. Y., Lester, B., Chou, K. S., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M., Jiang, L., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0970-4 · Cited by 142
Random access quantum information processors using multimode circuit quantum electrodynamics
Naik, R., Leung, N., Chakram, S., Groszkowski, P., Lu, Y., Earnest, N., McKay, D. C., Koch, J., & Schuster, D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02046-6 · Cited by 142
Microwave-activated conditional-phase gate for superconducting qubits
Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J., Cross, A. W., Merkel, S., Rigetti, C. T., & Steffen, M. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/115012 · Cited by 135
A CNOT gate between multiphoton qubits encoded in two cavities
Rosenblum, S., Gao, Y. Y., Reinhold, P., Wang, C., Axline, C. J., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., Jiang, L., Mirrahimi, M., Devoret, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03059-5 · Cited by 131
An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation
Gottesman, D. (2009) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0904.2557 · Cited by 129
Characterization of a Two-Transmon Processor with Individual Single-Shot Qubit Readout
Dewes, A., Ong, F. R., Schmitt, V., Lauro, R., Boulant, N., Bertet, P., Vion, D., & Esteve, D. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.057002 · Cited by 125
Leveraging Secondary Storage to Simulate Deep 54-qubit Sycamore CircuitsPreprint
Pednault, E., Gunnels, J. A., Nannicini, G., Lior Horesh, C., & Wisnieff, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.09534 · Cited by 119
Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices
Proctor, T. J., Carignan-Dugas, A., Rudinger, K., Nielsen, E., Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.030503 · Cited by 118
Digital Quantum Simulation of Spin Systems in Superconducting Circuits
Heras, U. L., Mezzacapo, A., Lamata, L., Filipp, S., Wallraff, A. J., & Solano, E. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.200501 · Cited by 116
Coherent Coupled Qubits for Quantum Annealing
Weber, S. J., Samach, G., Hover, D. J., Gustavsson, S., Kim, D. K., Melville, A. J., Rosenberg, D., Sears, A., Yan, F., Yoder, J., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.8.014004 · Cited by 116
Self-citationStudying light-harvesting models with superconducting circuits
Potočnik, A., Bargerbos, A., Schröder, F. A. Y. N., Khan, S. A., Collodo, M. C., Gasparinetti, S., Salathé, Y., Creatore, C., Eichler, C., Türeci, H. E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03312-x · Cited by 115
Digital Quantum Rabi and Dicke Models in Superconducting Circuits
Mezzacapo, A., Las Heras, U., Pedernales, J. S., DiCarlo, L., Solano, E., & Lamata, L. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07482 · Cited by 111
Probing the strongly driven spin-boson model in a superconducting quantum circuit
Magazzù, L., Forn-Díaz, P., Belyansky, R., Orgiazzi, J.-L., Yurtalan, M. A., Otto, M. R., Lupaşcu, A., Wilson, C. M., & Grifoni, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03626-w · Cited by 109
Mandrà, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, W., Perdomo‐Ortiz, A., & Katzgraber, H. G. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022337 · Cited by 108
Single-shot read-out of a superconducting qubit using a Josephson parametric oscillator
Krantz, P., Bengtsson, A., Simoen, M., Gustavsson, S., Shumeiko, V. S., Oliver, W. D., Wilson, C. M., Delsing, P., & Bylander, J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11417 · Cited by 104
Self-citationMostame, S., Rebentrost, P., Eisfeld, A., Kerman, A. J., Tsomokos, D. I., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/105013 · Cited by 104
Circuit QED and engineering charge-based superconducting qubits
Girvin, S. M., Devoret, M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2009) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2009/t137/014012 · Cited by 103
Gatemon Benchmarking and Two-Qubit Operations
Casparis, L., Larsen, T. W., Olsen, M. S., Kuemmeth, F., Krogstrup, P., Nygård, J., Petersson, K. D., & Marcus, C. M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.150505 · Cited by 100
Solving Systems of Linear Equations with a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Zheng, Y., Song, C., Chen, M.-C., Xia, B., Liu, W., Guo, Q., Zhang, L., Xu, D., Deng, H., Huang, K., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.210504 · Cited by 100
Evolution of Nanowire Transmon Qubits and Their Coherence in a Magnetic Field
Luthi, F., Stavenga, T., Enzing, O., Bruno, A., Dickel, C., Langford, N. K., Rol, M. A., Jespersen, T. S., Nygård, J., Krogstrup, P., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.100502 · Cited by 100
Compound Josephson-junction coupler for flux qubits with minimal crosstalk
Harris, R., Lanting, T. M., Berkley, A. J., Johansson, J., Johnson, M. W., Bunyk, P., Ladizinsky, E., Ladizinsky, N., Oh, T., & Han, S. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.052506 · Cited by 99
Improving Quantum Gate Fidelities by Using a Qubit to Measure Microwave Pulse Distortions
Gustavsson, S., Zwier, O. V., Bylander, J., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Nakamura, Y., Orlando, T. P., & Oliver, W. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.040502 · Cited by 99
Self-citationAndersen, C. K., Remm, A., Lazar, S., Krinner, S., Heinsoo, J., Besse, J.-C., Gabureac, M. S., Wallraff, A. J., & Eichler, C. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0185-4 · Cited by 91
Demonstration of a parametrically activated entangling gate protected from flux noise
Hong, S., Papageorge, A. T., Sivarajah, P., Crossman, G., Didier, N., Polloreno, A., Sete, E. A., Turkowski, S., Silva, M. P. D., & Johnson, B. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012302 · Cited by 87
Fermion-Fermion Scattering in Quantum Field Theory with Superconducting Circuits
García-Álvarez, L., Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., Egusquiza, I. L., Lamata, L., Romero, G., & Solano, E. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.070502 · Cited by 85
Quantum phases in circuit QED with a superconducting qubit array
Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Liang, J. Q., Chen, G., Jia, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04083 · Cited by 84
Recent Progress in Quantum Simulation Using Superconducting Circuits
Paraoanu, G. S. (2014) · Journal of Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1007/s10909-014-1175-8 · Cited by 79
Restless Tuneup of High-Fidelity Qubit Gates
Rol, M. A., Bultink, C. C., O’Brien, T. E., de Jong, S. R., Theis, L. S., Fu, X., Luthi, F., Vermeulen, R. F. L., de Sterke, J. C., Bruno, A., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.7.041001 · Cited by 79
Factoring larger integers with fewer qubits via quantum annealing with optimized parameters
Peng, W., Wang, B., Hu, F., Wang, Y.-J., Fang, X., Chen, X., & Wang, C. (2019) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9307-1 · Cited by 76
Quantum simulation of the spin-boson model with a microwave circuit
Leppäkangas, J., Braumüller, J., Hauck, M., Reiner, J.-M., Schwenk, I., Zanker, S., Fritz, L., Ustinov, A. V., Weides, M. P., & Marthaler, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.052321 · Cited by 70
Self-citationEntanglement Genesis by Ancilla-Based Parity Measurement in 2D Circuit QED
Saira, O.-P., Groen, J. P., Cramer, J., Meretska, M. L., de Lange, G., & DiCarlo, L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.070502 · Cited by 63
Observing the Nonequilibrium Dynamics of the Quantum Transverse-Field Ising Chain in Circuit QED
Viehmann, O., von Delft, J., & Marquardt, F. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.030601 · Cited by 62
Analog superconducting quantum simulator for Holstein polarons
Mei, F., Stojanović, V. M., Siddiqi, I. A., & Tian, L. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.224502 · Cited by 58
Non-stoquastic Hamiltonians in quantum annealing via geometric phases
Vinci, W., & Lidar, D. A. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0037-z · Cited by 53
Degeneracy-Preserving Quantum Nondemolition Measurement of Parity-Type Observables for Cat Qubits
Cohen, J., Smith, W. C., Devoret, M., & Mirrahimi, M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.060503 · Cited by 49
Characterization of a multimode coplanar waveguide parametric amplifier
Simoen, M., Chang, C. W. S., Krantz, P., Bylander, J., Wustmann, W., Shumeiko, V., Delsing, P., & Wilson, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4933265 · Cited by 48
Self-citationHigh-Fidelity Quantum Operations on Superconducting Qubits in the Presence of Noise
Kerman, A. J., & Oliver, W. D. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.070501 · Cited by 42
Self-citationCircuit QED and Sudden Phase Switching in a Superconducting Qubit Array
Tian, L. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.167001 · Cited by 42
Emulating the one-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model by a double chain of qubits
Reiner, J.-M., Marthaler, M., Braumüller, J., Weides, M. P., & Schön, G. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.032338 · Cited by 42
Self-citationQuantum simulation of Anderson and Kondo lattices with superconducting qubits
García‐Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E., & Martin-Delgado, M. A. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.024522 · Cited by 41
Quantum simulations of relativistic quantum physics in circuit QED
Pedernales, J. S., Di Candia, R., Ballester, D., & Solano, E. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/055008 · Cited by 40
Error-Transparent Quantum Gates for Small Logical Qubit Architectures
Kapit, E. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.050503 · Cited by 38
Metastable Superconducting Qubit
Kerman, A. J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.027002 · Cited by 33
Quantum fault tolerance in small experimentsPreprint
Gottesman, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.03507 · Cited by 30
Fermionic models with superconducting circuits
Heras, U. L., García-Álvarez, L., Mezzacapo, A., Solano, E., & Lamata, L. (2015) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0021-5 · Cited by 26
Quantum chemistry and charge transport in biomolecules with superconducting circuits
García-Álvarez, L., Heras, U. L., Mezzacapo, A., Sanz, M., Solano, E., & Lamata, L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27836 · Cited by 23
Quantum information storage using tunable flux qubits
Steffen, M., Brito, F., Divincenzo, D. P., Farinelli, M., Keefe, G., Ketchen, M. B., Kumar, S., Milliken, F., Rothwell, M. B., Rozen, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/5/053201 · Cited by 15
Demonstration of nonstoquastic Hamiltonian in coupled superconducting flux qubitsPreprint
Ozfidan, I., Deng, C., Smirnov, A. Y., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.06139
Verifying Multipartite Entangled GHZ States via Multiple Quantum CoherencesPreprint
Wei, K. X., Lauer, I., Srinivasan, S., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.05720
Protecting quantum entanglement from leakage and qubit errors via repetitive parity measurements
Bultink, C. C., O'Brien, T. E., Vollmer, R., Muthusubramanian, N., Beekman, M. W., Rol, M. A., Fu, X., Tarasinski, B., Ostroukh, V., Varbanov, B., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12731
Perspectives of quantum annealing: Methods and implementations
Hauke, P., Katzgraber, H. G., Lechner, W., Nishimori, H., & Oliver, W. D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.06559
Self-citationThe high-coherence fluxonium qubit
Nguyen, L. B., Lin, Y.-H., Somoroff, A., Mencia, R., Grabon, N., & Manucharyan, V. E. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.11006
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Nielsen MA, 2011, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
- Jones NC, 2012, Phys. Rev. X, 2, 031007
- Moore SK, 2017, IEEE Spectrum Tech Talk Blog
- Hsu J, 2018, IEEE Spectrum Tech Talk Blog
- Kelly J, 2018, Google AI Blog
- Wendin G, 2006, Handbook of Theoretical and Computational Nanotechnology, Vol. 3, Quantum and Molecular Computing, and Quantum Simulations, 223
- Girvin SM, 2014, Quantum Machines: Measurement and Control of Engineered Quantum Systems, Proceedings of the 2011 Les Houches Summer School on Quantum Machines, 113
- Kjaergaard M, Schwartz ME, Greene A, Samach GO, Bengtsson A, et al. 2020. arXiv:2001.08838 · arXiv
- Lin ZR, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 15
- IBM News Room, 2016, IBM makes quantum computing available on IBM cloud to accelerate innovation
- Salathé Y, 2015, Phys. Rev. X, 5, 021027
- Ballester D, 2012, Phys. Rev. X, 2, 021007
- Lamata L, 2018, Adv. Phys. X, 3, 1457981
- O'Malley PJ, 2016, Phys. Rev. X, 6, 031007
- 10.1038/nature23879 · DOI · Paper page
- Colless JI, 2018, Phys. Rev. X, 8, 011021
- Bravyi S, 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput., 8, 361
- Denchev VS, 2016, Phys. Rev. X, 6, 031015
- Gottesman D, 1997, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction
- Vuillot C, 2018, Quantum Inf. Comput., 18, 949
- Michael MH, 2016, Phys. Rev. X, 6, 031006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circuit quantum electrodynamics
Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M., & Wallraff, A. J. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025005 · Cited by 2,217
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate
Zhu, D., Shao, L., Yu, M., Cheng, R., Desiatov, B., Xin, C. J., Hu, Y., Holzgrafe, J., Ghosh, S., Shams-Ansari, A., et al. (2021) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.411024 · Cited by 1,516
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
de Leon, N. P., Itoh, K. M., Kim, D., Mehta, K. K., Northup, T. E., Paik, H., Palmer, B. S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D. W. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2823 · Cited by 710
“Tunable transmons or capacitively shunted flux qubits can allow for much faster gate times, around tens of nanoseconds ( 45 ), but their tunability also renders them more susceptible to flux noise, typically resulting in faster decoher-ence T 2,echo ≈ 20 m s ( 8 , 45 ).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M. E., Braumüller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J. I.-J., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
- MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2020-03-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 369-395
- ISSN
- 1947-5454 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-5462
- OpenAlex
- W2947902637
- Cited by
- 1,544
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 233 · 2025: 333 · 2024: 269 · 2023: 230 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 68
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (FA8721-05-C-0002, 1720311)
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (FA8721-05-C-0002)
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF1810218)
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine
- Wallenberg Center for Quantum Technology, Chalmers University of Technology
- Army Research Office (W911NF-18-1-0116, W911NF1810218, W911NF-18-1-0411, W911NF-14-1, W911NF-141-0682, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
- Keywords
- superconducting qubits, quantum computing hardware, noisy intermediate-scale quantum computing, two-qubit gate fidelity, qubit readout, logical qubits, quantum error correction, quantum algorithms, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
