CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolutionary Inferences from Phylogenies: A Review of Methods

O'Meara, Brian C.·2012·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160331
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There are many methods for making evolutionary inferences from phylogenetic trees. Many of these can be divided into three main classes of models: continuous-time Markov chain models with finite state space (CTMC-FSS), multivariate normal models, and birth-death models. Numerous approaches are just restrictions of more general models to focus on particular questions or kinds of data. Methods can be further modified with the addition of tree-stretching algorithms. The recent realization of the effect of correlated trait evolution with diversification rates represents an important advance that is slowly revolutionizing the field. Increased attention to model adequacy may lead to future methodological improvements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160331

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. Akaike H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory, ed. BN Petrov, F Csaki, pp. 267–81. Budapest: Akad. Kiado
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0811087106 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010003 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01619.x · DOI
  5. Beaumont MA, 2002, Genetics, 162, 2025, 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01574.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00458.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00455.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00492.x · DOI
  11. 10.1086/426002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/10635150290102555 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2399846 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2408790 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01382-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/sysbio/syq032 · DOI
  17. Edwards AWF, 1964, Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification, 6, 67
  18. 10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.002305 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/2409811 · DOI
  20. Felsenstein J, 2004, Inferring Phylogenies.
  21. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1669 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/587525 · DOI
  23. 10.1086/663681 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025575 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/sysbio/syq053 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/sysbio/syp067 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003868 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025991 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gittleman JL, 1990, Syst. Biol., 39, 227
  31. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00034 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/sysbio/syr046 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF00182751 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00255.x · DOI
  35. 10.1101/gr.3567505 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/2410878 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00412.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538 · DOI
  40. 10.1086/380570 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-194 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/2413514 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/molbev/msh123 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/10635150390192780 · DOI
  45. 10.1554/01-012 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.1065889 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/sysbio/syp074 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/10635150701313830 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/2409810 · DOI
  50. Jones DT, 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci., 8, 275
  51. 10.1214/aoms/1177730285 · DOI
  52. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095702 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/106351501753462876 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/sysbio/syq052 · DOI
  55. 10.1086/285743 · DOI
  56. 10.2307/2409716 · DOI
  57. 10.2307/2409434 · DOI
  58. 10.2307/2992324 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00517.x · DOI
  60. 10.1080/10635150701607033 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00826.x · DOI
  62. 10.1086/286013 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01569.x · DOI
  64. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Presented atGateway Comput. Environ. Workshop (GCE) Nov. 14, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1–8 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_23 · DOI
  66. 10.1098/rstb.1994.0054 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/10635150290102393 · DOI
  68. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01171.x · DOI
  69. 10.1006/clad.1994.1010 · DOI
  70. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1080/10635150490468675 · DOI
  74. 10.1086/503444 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1080/10635150490522232 · DOI
  76. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0158 · DOI
  77. Paradis E, 2011, Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R
  78. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01429.x · DOI
  79. 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3066 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1093/sysbio/syq058 · DOI
  82. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1278 · DOI
  83. 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 1
  84. 10.1554/05-424.1 · DOI
  85. 10.1093/sysbio/syp069 · DOI
  86. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00926.x · DOI
  87. 10.1080/10635150701883881 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00616.x · DOI
  89. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144710 · DOI
  90. 10.1126/science.269.5222.390 · DOI
  91. 10.1126/science.264.5165.1590 · DOI
  92. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05095.x · DOI
  93. 10.1080/106351599260229 · DOI
  94. Slowinski JB, Guyer C. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. Am. Nat. 907–21 · DOI
  95. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026364 · DOI
  96. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.12.003 · DOI
  97. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00132.x · DOI
  98. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3488 · DOI
  99. 10.1007/BF02459467 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/S0025-5564(97)00081-3 · DOI
  101. 10.1038/nature10004 · DOI
  102. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · DOI
  103. 10.2307/2413672 · DOI
  104. 10.1007/BF00160154 · DOI · Paper page
  105. Yang ZH, 1995, Genetics, 139, 993, 10.1093/genetics/139.2.993 · DOI
  106. 10.1007/BF02198856 · DOI
  107. Yang ZH, 1995, Genetics, 141, 1641, 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641 · DOI
  108. Yang ZH, 1995, Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, 451
  109. 10.1098/rstb.1925.0002 · DOI
  110. 10.1093/molbev/msi237 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
O'Meara, B. C.
Affiliations
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996;,
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
267-285
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
DOI
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160331
OpenAlex
W2171059556
Cited by
268
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
evolutionary inference, phylogenetic tree, continuous-time Markov chain model, finite state space, multivariate normal model, birth-death model, diversification rates, model adequacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review