Cited by 411Populism, Right-Wing MovementsGlobalization and political ideologiesMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism

Rodrik, Dani·2021·Annual Review of Economics

Abstract

There is compelling evidence that globalization shocks, often working through culture and identity, have played an important role in driving up support for populist movements, particularly of the right-wing kind. I start with an empirical analysis of the 2016 presidential election in the United States to show that globalization-related attitudinal variables were important correlates of the switch to Trump. I then provide a conceptual framework that identifies four distinct channels through which globalization can stimulate populism, two each on the demand and supply sides of politics. I evaluate the empirical literature with the help of this framework, discussing trade, financial globalization, and immigration separately. I conclude the review by discussing some apparently anomalous cases in which populists have been against, rather than in favor of, trade protection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-economics-070220-032416

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1111/ajps.12503 · DOI
  2. book, 2019, User's guide and codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series study
  3. Anelli M, 2019, We were the robots: automation and voting behavior in Western Europe
  4. 10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ballard-Rosa C, 2018, Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States
  6. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.03.002 · DOI
  7. Barone G, 2019, Low-wage import competition and populist backlash: the case of Italy
  8. Becker SO, 2017, Did Eastern European immigration cause an increase in anti-European sentiment in the UK?
  9. 10.1093/epolic/eix012 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s11127-020-00857-8 · DOI
  11. Bornschier S., 2018, The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, 212
  12. Bossert W, 2019, Economic insecurity and the rise of the right
  13. Broz JL, 2019, Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash
  14. 10.1111/kykl.12161 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/jors.12503 · DOI
  16. Cerrato A, 2018, Why does import competition favor Republicans?
  17. 10.3386/w22178 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Chen S., 2018, Unemployment, immigration, and populism: evidence from two quasi-natural experiments in the United States
  19. Choi J, 2020, Local employment and political effects of trade deals: evidence from NAFTA
  20. 10.1017/S0003055417000685 · DOI
  21. Colantone I, 2018, The economic determinants of the “cultural backlash”: globalization and attitudes in Western Europe
  22. 10.1111/ajps.12358 · DOI
  23. Dal Bó E, 2019, Economic losers and political winners: Sweden's radical right
  24. 10.1017/S0022050713000302 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/ej/ueaa006 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/pan.2018.48 · DOI
  27. Dippel C, 2018, Instrumental variables and causal mechanisms: unpacking the effect of trade on workers and voters
  28. Doerr S, 2020, From finance to fascism
  29. 10.1093/restud/rdy047 · DOI
  30. book, 2016, The Economy After Brexit
  31. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.03.001 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/9781108354943 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Erickson J, 2014, The middle-class squeeze: a picture of stagnant incomes, rising costs, and what we can do to strengthen America's middle class
  34. book, 2017, Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession
  35. 10.1257/aer.20181164 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006 · DOI
  37. Gerdes C, 2010, The impact of immigration on election outcomes in Danish municipalities
  38. Gidron N, 2017, Br. J. Sociol., 68, S57
  39. 10.1177/1354068817718949 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/restud/rdaa031 · DOI
  41. Guiso L, 2018, Populism: demand and supply
  42. Guriev S, 2020, The political economy of populism
  43. Gyöngyösi G, 2020, Financial crisis, creditor-debtor conflict, and populism
  44. Hacker JS, 2020, Let Them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality
  45. 10.1093/jeea/jvx003 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/sjoe.12239 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1909202116 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871 · DOI
  49. Hochschild AR., 2016, Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right
  50. 10.1007/s11109-019-09567-4 · DOI
  51. 10.1177/2053168018822395 · DOI
  52. Inglehart R, 2016, Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash
  53. 10.7208/chicago/9780226399010.001.0001 · DOI
  54. Iversen T, 2017, Transition to the knowledge economy and the rise of populism: a human capital perspective
  55. 10.1017/S0020818317000194 · DOI
  56. Kuk J., 2019, The effects of economic distress on racial attitudes
  57. 10.1177/0010414020912283 · DOI
  58. Malgouyres C., 2017, Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections
  59. 10.1257/jep.33.4.152 · DOI
  60. Mayda AM, 2019, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.
  61. 10.1080/0023656042000217246 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/s00148-013-0471-y · DOI
  63. 10.1257/mac.6.2.1 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.3386/w25077 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101765 · DOI
  66. 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-063806 · DOI
  67. 10.1017/9781108595841 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.01.004 · DOI
  69. 10.2307/41165897 · DOI
  70. Rodrik D., 2011, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy
  71. 10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4 · DOI
  72. 10.1177/0010414017710264 · DOI
  73. Rothwell JT, 2016, Explaining nationalist political views: the case of Donald Trump
  74. 10.1007/s00168-020-00996-2 · DOI
  75. Schwartz C, 2020, Br. J. Political Sci
  76. 10.2307/j.ctvc77mmb · DOI · Paper page
  77. Steiner ND, 2020, Local trade shocks and the nationalist backlash in political attitudes: panel data evidence from Great Britain
  78. Strain MR, 2019, Economic shocks and clinging
  79. 10.1093/soceco/1.2.215 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1093/restud/rdz027 · DOI
  81. Vertier P, 2019, Dismantling the “jungle”: migrant relocation and extreme voting in France
  82. Wilkinson W., 2019, The density divide: urbanization, polarization, and populist backlash
  83. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1678055 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodrik, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rodrik, Dani
Venue
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2021-08-05
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
133-170
ISSN
  • 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1391
OpenAlex
W3128246896
Cited by
411
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 10
FWCI
33.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
globalization, right-wing populism, populism, 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, trade, financial globalization, immigration, cultural change, identity, protectionism, political economy of globalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review