Cited by 553Sharing Economy and PlatformsDigital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Economy and Work Transformation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peer-to-Peer Markets

Open access
Einav, Liran, Farronato, Chiara, Levin, Jonathan·2016·Annual Review of Economics

Abstract

Peer-to-peer markets such as eBay, Uber, and Airbnb allow small suppliers to compete with traditional providers of goods or services. We view the primary function of these markets as making it easy for buyers to find sellers and engage in convenient, trustworthy transactions. We discuss elements of market design that make this possible, including search and matching algorithms, pricing, and reputation systems. We then develop a simple model of how these markets enable entry by small or flexible suppliers, and how they impact existing firms. Finally, we consider the regulation of peer-to-peer markets and the economic arguments for different approaches to licensing and certification, data, and employment regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y. 2015. Managing congestion in dynamic matching markets . Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. · DOI
  2. David PA, 1985, Am. Econ. Rev., 77, 332
  3. 10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.003 · DOI
  4. Milgrom P, 1994, Am. Econ. Rev., 84, 441
  5. 10.2307/3003160 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW. 2014. The rise of the sharing economy: estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry . Work. Pap., Boston Univ. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–461 of 461

Metadata

Authors
Einav, L., Farronato, C., & Levin, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-6072;,
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2016-10-31
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
615-635
ISSN
  • 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1391
OpenAlex
W2144931085
Cited by
553
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 15
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
peer-to-peer markets, market design, pricing, reputation systems, market entry, data regulation, employment regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review