Cited by 131Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States

Open access
Gassmann, Aaron J., Reisig, Dominic D.·2023·Annual Review of Entomology

Abstract

Genetically engineered corn and cotton that produce insecticidal toxins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have been used to manage insect pests in the United States and elsewhere. In some cases, this has led to regional suppression of pest populations and pest eradication within the United States, and these outcomes were associated with reductions in conventional insecticides and increased profits for farmers. In other instances, pests evolved resistance to multiple Bt traits, compromising the capacity of Bt crops to manage pests and leading to increased feeding injury to crops in the field. Several aspects of pest biology and pest–crop interactions were associated with cases where pests remained susceptible versus instances where pests evolved resistance. The viability of future transgenic traits can be improved by learning from these past outcomes. In particular, efforts should be made to delay resistance by increasing the prevalence of refuges and using integrated pest management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-105502

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 135 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bacheler JS, Mott DW, Morrison DE. 1997. Efficacy of grower-managed Bt cotton in North Carolina. See Reference 39, pp. 858–61
  2. Bagwell RD, Graves JB, Holloway JW, Leonard BR, Burris E, et al. 1997. Status of insecticide resistance in tobacco budworm and bollworm in Louisiana during 1996. See Reference 39, pp. 1282–89
  3. 10.1093/ee/35.5.1439 · DOI
  4. DiFonzo C., 2022, The handy Bt trait table for U.S. corn production
  5. Duggar CP, 1997, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference
  6. Graham SH, 2018, J. Econ. Entomol., 111, 2717
  7. ISAAA, 2019, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2019: Biotech Crops Drive Socio-Economic Development and Sustainable Environment in the New Frontier
  8. James C., 1997, Global Status of Transgenic Crops in 1997
  9. Layton MB, Williams MR, Andrews G, Stewart SD. 1996. Severity and distribution of the 1995 tobacco budworm outbreak in Mississippi. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Vol. 2, ed. CP Dugger, DA Richter, pp. 820–22. Memphis, TN: Natl. Cotton Counc.
  10. Mason CE, 1996, European Corn Borer: Ecology and Management
  11. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med., 2016, Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects
  12. Reisig DD, 2018, Environ. Entomol., 47, 1357
  13. Smith RH. 1997. An extension entomologist's 1996 observations of Bollgard (Bt) technology. See Reference 39, pp. 856–58
  14. US Environ. Prot. Agency., 1998, Final report of the FIFRA scientific advisory panel subpanel on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) plant-pesticides and resistance management
  15. US Environ. Prot. Agency, 2011, Biopesticide registration action document: MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 88017 x DAS-59122-7 (SmartStax®) B.t
  16. US Environ. Prot. Agency, 2020, Current and previously registered Section 3 plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) registrations
  17. US Environ. Prot. Agency, 2021, Notice of pesticide registration: Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 5% Refuge Seed Blend Corn
  18. USDA Econ. Res. Serv, 2020, Recent trends in GE adoption
  19. Vyavhare SS, 2019, Bt cotton

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Metadata

Authors
Gassmann, A. J., & Reisig, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Entomology
Published
2023-01-23
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
31-49
ISSN
  • 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4487
OpenAlex
W4297516574
Cited by
130
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 25
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bt crops, insect pest management, insecticide resistance, resistance management, refuge, integrated pest management, genetically modified crops, pest eradication, feeding injury, pest biology, United States
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacterial Proteins, Endotoxins, Hemolysin Proteins, Insecticide Resistance, Insecta, Moths, Pest Control, Biological, United States, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review