Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Concept of the Anthropocene

Open access
Malhi, Yadvinder·2017·Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Abstract

The Anthropocene, the concept that the Earth has moved into a novel geological epoch characterized by human domination of the planetary system, is an increasingly prevalent framework for debate both in academia and as a wider cultural and policy zeitgeist. This article reviews the proliferation of literature surrounding this concept. It explores the origins and history of the concept, as well as the arguments surrounding its geological formalization and starting date ranging from the Pleistocene to the twentieth century. It examines perspectives and critiques of the concept from the Earth system sciences, ecological and geological sciences, and social sciences and humanities, exploring its role as a cultural zeitgeist and ideological provocation. I conclude by offering a personal perspective on the concept of the Anthropocene and its utility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060854

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Crutzen PJ, 2000, Glob. Chang. Newsl., 41, 17
  2. Vernadsky W, 1945, Am. Sci., 33, 1
  3. Gradstein FM, 2012, The Geologic Time Scale 2012
  4. Steffen W, 2015, Science, 348, 1217
  5. 10.1098/rsta.2010.0331 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hamilton C, 2016, Anthr. Rev., 3, 1
  7. Hamilton C, 2017, Defiant Earth. The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene.
  8. Mann CC, 2011, 1493: How Europe's Discovery of the Americas Revolutionized Trade, Ecology and Life on Earth
  9. 10.1057/9781137503886 · doi:10.1057/9781137503886
  10. 10.1111/dial.12125 · doi:10.1111/dial.12125
  11. Ellis EC, 2013, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 1, 1
  12. 105. Hornborg A. 2015. The political ecology of the Technocene: uncovering ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. See Ref. 118, pp. 57–69 · doi:10.4324/9781315743424-5
  13. Parikka J, 2014, The Anthrobscene
  14. De la Cadena M, 2015, e-flux, 56
  15. 110. Fressoz J-B. 2015. Losing the Earth knowingly. Six environmental grammars around 1800. See Ref. 118, pp. 70–83 · doi:10.4324/9781315743424-6
  16. Marris E, 2011, Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-wild World
  17. Thomas CD, 2017, Inheritors of the Earth

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Malhi, Y.
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2017-10-17
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
77-104
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
OpenAlex
W2644950089
Cited by
283
References
101
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.annualreviews.org/licenses/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Concept of the Anthropocene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060854
The paper
Malhi, Y. (2017). The Concept of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060854

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.