CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,346Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and EconomicsGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications

Seto, Karen C., Davis, Steven J., Mitchell, Ronald B., Stokes, Eleanor C., Unruh, Gregory, Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana·2016·Annual Review of Environment and Resources
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Existing technologies, institutions, and behavioral norms together act to constrain the rate and magnitude of carbon emissions reductions in the coming decades. The inertia of carbon emissions due to such mutually reinforcing physical, economic, and social constraints is referred to as carbon lock-in. Carbon lock-in is a special case of path dependency, which is common in the evolution of complex systems. However, carbon lock-in is particularly prone to entrenchment given the large capital costs, long infrastructure lifetimes, and interrelationships between the socioeconomic and technical systems involved. Further, the urgency of efforts to avoid dangerous climate change exacerbates the liability of even small lock-in risks. Although carbon lock-in has been recognized for years, efforts to characterize the types and causes of carbon lock-in, or to quantitatively assess and evaluate its policy implications, have been limited and scattered across a number of different disciplines. This systematic review of the literature synthesizes what is known about the types and causes of carbon lock-in, including the scale, magnitude, and longevity of the effects, and policy implications. We identify three main types of carbon lock-in and describe how they coevolve: (a) infrastructural and technological, (b) institutional, and (c) behavioral. Although each type of lock-in has its own set of processes, all three are tightly intertwined and contribute to the inertia of carbon emissions. We outline the conditions, opportunities, and strategies for fostering transitions toward less-carbon-intensive emissions trajectories. We conclude by proposing a carbon lock-in research agenda that can help bridge the gaps between science, knowledge, and policy-making.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Foxon TJ., 2003, Inducing Innovation for a Low Carbon Future: Drivers, Barriers and Policies
  2. Seto KC, 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  3. 10.1596/1813-9450-5063 · DOI
  4. Sierra Club, 2012, Locked-In: The Financial Risks of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Today's Volatile International Coal Market
  5. Lucon O, 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  6. Foxon TJ., 2012, Creating a Sustainable Economy: An Institutional and Evolutionary Approach to Environmental Policy, 115
  7. Cook E., 1982, Soc. Sci. Q., 63, 3
  8. Lauber V, 2015, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 34, 256
  9. Chorus CG, 2012, J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 46, 139
  10. Jackson T., 2005, Sustain. Dev. Res. Netw., 29, 30
  11. Evans D, 2012, The Habits of Consumption, 113

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy, Central European University, 1051 Budapest, Hungary
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
425-452
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
DOI
10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
OpenAlex
W2515423874
Cited by
1,346
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 276 · 2025: 194 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Keywords
carbon lock-in, path dependence, climate change mitigation, institutional lock-in, low-carbon transition, climate policy, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review