Cited by 137

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Need for a Human Pangenome Reference Sequence

Miga, Karen H., Wang, Ting·2021·Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics

Abstract

The reference human genome sequence is inarguably the most important and widely used resource in the fields of human genetics and genomics. It has transformed the conduct of biomedical sciences and brought invaluable benefits to the understanding and improvement of human health. However, the commonly used reference sequence has profound limitations, because across much of its span, it represents the sequence of just one human haplotype. This single, monoploid reference structure presents a critical barrier to representing the broad genomic diversity in the human population. In this review, we discuss the modernization of the reference human genome sequence to a more complete reference of human genomic diversity, known as a human pangenome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-genom-120120-081921

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. 10.1038/nature09534 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02058.x · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2371-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.039 · DOI · Paper page
  6. After Havasupai litigation, Native Americans wary of genetic research. 2010.Am. J. Med. Genet. A152A:ix · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007 · DOI
  8. 10.7554/eLife.25060 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.05.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41525-019-0111-x · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms6969 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-981-13-6037-4_7 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/ije/dyz064 · DOI
  14. 10.1534/g3.114.015784 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/gim.2014.74 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/s41587-020-0582-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001661 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nrg1596 · DOI
  21. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, Zhang H, Li H. 2020. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly with phased assembly graphs. arXiv:2008.01237 [q-bio.GN] · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41586-020-2859-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001091 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.8211127 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.1084564 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Comput. Pan-Genomics Consort, 2018, Brief. Bioinform., 19, 118
  27. 10.1126/science.328.5978.558 · DOI
  28. 10.1056/NEJMc2028907 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz235 · DOI
  30. 10.1136/jme.25.2.204 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/gr.225672.117 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1186/s13059-019-1751-y · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002138 · DOI
  34. 10.1101/2020.11.11.378133 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-019-13341-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nrg1322 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1105136 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nature05874 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/nature11247 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1101/gr.233460.117 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/nbt.4227 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/jhered/esp086 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nature13424 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41576-020-0275-3 · DOI
  46. 10.2217/pme-2019-0021 · DOI
  47. 10.1101/gr.5533506 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.aaf6162 · DOI
  49. 10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115721 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/526029a · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1186/s13059-020-02038-8 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Guan D., 2020, Github
  54. 10.1038/ncomms12989 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.1110731108 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/s13059-020-1941-7 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.2217/pme-2018-0037 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1101/gr.214007.116 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nature04226 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1038/nature03001 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1038/ng.1028 · DOI
  62. 10.1186/s13073-016-0383-z · DOI
  63. 10.1038/nbt.4060 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1038/nbt.4109 · DOI
  65. 10.1126/science.1218015 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163834 · DOI
  69. Knowler WC, 1988, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 43, 520
  70. 10.1038/35057062 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1126/science.1153717 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/nbt.1596 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/s41576-020-0236-x · DOI
  74. 10.1038/s41586-021-03420-7 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/s41467-020-19653-5 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/nature23264 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/aje/kwr160 · DOI
  78. 10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025327 · DOI
  79. 10.1038/s41586-020-2547-7 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1111/dewb.12277 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.je.2016.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1038/nature09990 · DOI
  83. 10.1101/gr.263566.120 · DOI
  84. 10.12688/f1000research.10137.1 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/nrg2641 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1101/gr.214155.116 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty841 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00442.x · DOI
  89. 10.1101/gr.193474.115 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1038/s41588-018-0316-4 · DOI
  91. 10.1186/s13059-020-02157-2 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1515/9781400826407 · DOI
  93. 10.1038/s41586-020-1965-x · DOI
  94. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1001/archinte.1964.03860120104011 · DOI
  96. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx236 · DOI
  97. 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1717 · DOI
  98. 10.1038/gim.2016.183 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.022 · DOI
  100. 10.1038/nbt.2116 · DOI
  101. 10.1038/s41588-018-0273-y · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1038/s41576-020-0210-7 · DOI
  103. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01863.x · DOI
  105. Song L, 2010, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc., db.prot5384, 10.1101/pdb.prot5384 · DOI
  106. 10.1186/s12920-017-0273-2 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014 · DOI
  108. 10.1038/nature15394 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1073/pnas.1613365113 · DOI
  110. 10.1186/s40246-020-00288-y · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.007 · DOI
  112. 10.1126/science.1058040 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.016 · DOI
  114. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982 · DOI
  115. 10.1038/s41467-020-19311-w · DOI
  116. 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0317 · DOI
  117. 10.1038/s41586-020-2818-3 · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 137

Metadata

Authors
Miga, K. H., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA;
  • Department of Genetics, Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, and McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
Venue
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
Published
2021-08-31
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
81-102
ISSN
  • 1527-8204
  • 1545-293X
Cited by
137
References
31
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review