The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in the Treatment of Context in Organizational Research
Open accessAbstract
Although scholars in the field of organizational behavior have raised concerns about a lack of contextual appreciation, there has been a recent embrace of contextual thinking in the organizational sciences. In this review, I discuss several recent theories and measures of context. The added value of a contextual approach is illustrated by how context can shape personality, how it affects the emergence of work designs, and how it benefits the study of organizational demography. Future research topics include context cue sensitivity, the way context is shaped, the mediators of context effects, and the breadth and limits of contextual impact. A recurrent theme is that although context enables a demarcation of what is distinctive about situations, it also permits integration across research areas and levels of analysis, identifying what they have in common as settings for organizational behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling
Tropman, J. E., & Hochschild, A. R. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324333 · Cited by 8,746
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,914
Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604 · Cited by 3,872
The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior
Johns, G. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 · Cited by 3,532
Self-citationMorgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 · Cited by 2,241
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
TIME AN TRANSITION IN WORK TEAMS: TOWARD A NEW MODEL OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256496 · Cited by 2,133
Cited by
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766 · Cited by 594
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173
Vu, T., Vo‐Thanh, T., Chi, H., Nguyen, N. P., Nguyen, D. V., & Zaman, M. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22101 · Cited by 71
Sanders, K., & De Cieri, H. (2021) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22028 · Cited by 41
Big data: lessons for employers and employees
Jeske, D., & Calvard, T. (2020) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-06-2018-0159 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Johns, G.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2018-01-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-46
- ISSN
- 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-0616
- OpenAlex
- W2625889787
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in the Treatment of Context in Organizational Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
- The paper
- Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the Treatment of Context in Organizational Research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
