The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss from Cool Stars: Impact on the Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations
Abstract
▪ Abstract This review emphasizes the mass loss processes that affect the fates of single stars with initial masses between one and nine solar masses. Just one epoch of mass loss has been clearly demonstrated to be important for these stars; that is the episode that ends their evolution up the asymptotic giant branch. Quite a clear picture of this evolutionary stage is emerging from current studies. Mass loss rates increase precipitously as stars evolve toward greater luminosity and radius and decreased effective temperature. As a result, empirical relationships between mass loss rates and stellar parameters are determined mostly by selection effects and tell us which stars are losing mass rather than how stars lose mass. After detailed theoretical models are found to match observational constraints, the models may be used to extrapolate to populations not available for study nearby, such as young stars with low metallicity. The fates of stars are found to depend on both their initial masses and their initial metallicities; a larger proportion of low-metallicity stars should end up with core masses reaching the Chandrasekhar limit, giving rise to Type 1.5 supernovae, and the remnant white dwarfs of low-Z populations will be both fewer and more massive than those in Population I. There are also clear indications that some stars lose one to several tenths of a solar mass during the helium core flash, but neither models nor observations reveal any details of this process yet. The observational and theoretical bases for a variety of mass loss formulae in current use are also reviewed in this article, and the relations are compared in a series of figures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mannings, V (2000) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6299 · Cited by 4,151
Optical properties of interstellar graphite and silicate grains
Draine, B. T., & Lee, H. M. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/162480 · Cited by 3,279
Interplanetary dynamical processes
Chamberlain, J. W. (1964) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/0032-0633(64)90147-3 · Cited by 1,339
Magnetocentrifugally driven flows from young stars and disks. 1: A generalized model
Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., Wilkin, F., Ruden, S., & Lizano, S. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/174363 · Cited by 1,325
Asymptotic Giant Branch Evolution and Beyond
Iben, I., & Renzini, A. (1983) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415 · Cited by 1,290
Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173033 · Cited by 1,253
Interplanetary Dynamical Processes
PARKER, E. N., Marshak, R. E., & Johnson, G. (1964) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3051487 · Cited by 1,200
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., & Cassinelli, J. P. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175012 · Cited by 1,046
AAS Position on the Space Station
Shu, F. H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.265.5180.1789.a · Cited by 789
Principles of stellar structure
Cox, J. P., & Giuli, R. T. (1968) · Gordon and Breach eBooks · Cited by 591
Cited by
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
Evolution of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Herwig, F. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · Cited by 1,051
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
“RSG mass loss is time dependent, and there appears to be a wide dispersion even for a given luminosity and temperature (Willson 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialTESTING A PREDICTIVE THEORETICAL MODEL FOR THE MASS LOSS RATES OF COOL STARS
Cranmer, S. R., & Saar, S. H. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/54 · Cited by 341
Girardi, L., Williams, B. F., Gilbert, K. M., Rosenfield, P., Dalcanton, J. J., Marigo, P., Boyer, M. L., Dolphin, A., Weisz, D. R., Melbourne, J., et al. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/1030 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Willson, L. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 573-611
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2168023905
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass Loss from Cool Stars: Impact on the Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.573
- The paper
- Willson, L. A. (2000). Mass Loss from Cool Stars: Impact on the Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.