The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining Pathway
Open accessAbstract
Double-strand DNA breaks are common events in eukaryotic cells, and there are two major pathways for repairing them: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). The various causes of double-strand breaks (DSBs) result in a diverse chemistry of DNA ends that must be repaired. Across NHEJ evolution, the enzymes of the NHEJ pathway exhibit a remarkable degree of structural tolerance in the range of DNA end substrate configurations upon which they can act. In vertebrate cells, the nuclease, DNA polymerases, and ligase of NHEJ are the most mechanistically flexible and multifunctional enzymes in each of their classes. Unlike repair pathways for more defined lesions, NHEJ repair enzymes act iteratively, act in any order, and can function independently of one another at each of the two DNA ends being joined. NHEJ is critical not only for the repair of pathologic DSBs as in chromosomal translocations, but also for the repair of physiologic DSBs created during variable (diversity) joining [V(D)J] recombination and class switch recombination (CSR). Therefore, patients lacking normal NHEJ are not only sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR), but also severely immunodeficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Breakpoints of some non-recurrent deletion CNVs have sequences with very short (2–20 basepairs) stretches of nucleotide identity. These are predicted to be formed by an alternative microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ) mechanism (Lieber, 2010).”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Lieber, 2010
In the citing paper
“DNA double-strand break repair or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repairs breaks induced by ionizing radiation (IR), oxidative free radicals, misappropriate enzymatic action at sensitive sites, inhibition of topoisomerases, and other mechanical stresses [54].”
From Integration of DNA damage and repair with murine double-minute 2 (Mdm2) in tumorigenesis (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydroperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs.
Chance, B., Sies, H., & Boveris, A. (1979) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.527 · Cited by 5,827
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. (2005) · doi:10.1128/9781555816704 · Cited by 5,683
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage
Falck, J., Coates, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03442 · Cited by 1,304
Meiotic Chromosomes: Integrating Structure and Function
Zickler, D., & Kleckner, N. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603 · Cited by 1,256
Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair
Walker, J. R., Corpina, R. A., & Goldberg, J. D. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35088000 · Cited by 1,216
Walker, E. H., Pacold, M. E., Perišić, O., Stephens, L., Hawkins, P. T., Wymann, M. P., & Williams, R. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00089-4 · Cited by 1,211
Ma, Y., Pannicke, U., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00671-2 · Cited by 1,166
Self-citationATM and DNA-PK Function Redundantly to Phosphorylate H2AX after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
Stiff, T., O’Driscoll, M., Rief, N., Iwabuchi, K., Löbrich, M., & Jeggo, P. A. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3207 · Cited by 1,050
The Mechanism and Regulation of Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination
Bassing, C. H., Swat, W., & Alt, F. W. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00675-x · Cited by 1,006
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Martin GM, 1985, Isr. J. Med. Sci., 21, 296
- Wilson TE, 2009, Wiley Encyclopedia of Chemical Biology, 3, 423
- Welzel N, 2001, Cancer Res., 61, 1629
- van der Burg M, 2009, J. Clin. Investig., 119, 91
- Kornberg A, 1992, DNA Replication
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,005
The Role of DNA Damage in Neural Plasticity in Physiology and Neurodegeneration
Konopka, A., & Atkin, J. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.836885 · Cited by 56
DNA-PKcs promotes fork reversal and chemoresistance
Dibitetto, D., Marshall, S., Sanchi, A., Liptay, M., Badar, J., Lopes, M., Rottenberg, S., & Smolka, M. B. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.08.028 · Cited by 56
The Role of the COP9 Signalosome and Neddylation in DNA Damage Signaling and Repair
Chung, D., & Dellaire, G. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5042388 · Cited by 50
Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V(D)J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA
Little, A. J., Corbett, E., Ortega, F. E., & Schatz, D. G. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1461 · Cited by 51
Hung, P. J., Chen, B.-R., George, R., Liberman, C., Morales, A. J., Colon-Ortiz, P., Tyler, J. K., Sleckman, B. P., & Bredemeyer, A. L. (2016) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2016.1253640 · Cited by 49
Timm, S., Lorat, Y., Jakob, B., Taucher-Scholz, G., & Rübe, C. E. (2018) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 51
Yu, M., Sun, X., Tyler, S. R., Liang, B., Swatek, A. M., Lynch, T. J., He, N., Yuan, F., Feng, Z., Rotti, P. G., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37192-4 · Cited by 51
Genome Editing by CRISPR-Cas: A Game Change in the Genetic Manipulation of Chlamydomonas
Ghribi, M., Nouemssi, S. B., Meddeb‐Mouelhi, F., & Desgagné‐Penix, I. (2020) · Life · doi:10.3390/life10110295 · Cited by 51
Gene Targeting in Human Pluripotent CellsPreprint
Hockemeyer, D. F., & Jaenisch, R. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.021 · Cited by 51
DNA Double-Strand Breaks as Pathogenic Lesions in Neurological Disorders
Provasek, V. E., Mitra, J., Malojirao, V. H., & Hegde, M. L. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23094653 · Cited by 54
A detailed procedure for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana
Liu, W., Zhu, X., Lei, M., Xia, Q., Botella, J. R., Zhu, J.-K., & Mao, Y. (2015) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11434-015-0848-2 · Cited by 50
The Mechanism of Gene Targeting in Human Somatic Cells
Kan, Y., Ruis, B. L., Lin, S. G., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004251 · Cited by 50
Wong, V. C., Cash, H. L., Morse, J., Lü, S., & Zhitkovich, A. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.20905 · Cited by 50
Cortizas, E. M., Zahn, A., Hajjar, M. E., Patenaude, A., Noia, J. M. D., & Verdún, R. E. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1301300 · Cited by 50
Dylawerska, A., Barczak, W., Wegner, A., Golusiński, W., & Suchorska, W. M. (2017) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-017-1057-4 · Cited by 52
cGAS/STING: novel perspectives of the classic pathway
Gao, M., He, Y., Tang, H., Chen, X., Liu, S., & Tao, Y. (2020) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-020-00006-z · Cited by 50
Recent advances of Cas12a applications in bacteria
Meliawati, M., Schilling, C., & Schmid, J. (2021) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-021-11243-9 · Cited by 51
Improving Homology-Directed Repair in Genome Editing Experiments by Influencing the Cell Cycle
Smirnikhina, S., Zaynitdinova, M. I., Sergeeva, V. A., & Лавров, А. В. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23115992 · Cited by 54
Lin, I.-T., Chao, J., & Yao, M.-C. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-11-0952 · Cited by 49
Ku70 and non-homologous end joining protect testicular cells from DNA damage
Ahmed, E. A., Sfeir, A. J., Takai, H., & Scherthan, H. (2013) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.122788 · Cited by 48
Dynamics of double strand breaks and chromosomal translocations
Iarovaia, O. V., Rubtsov, M. A., Ioudinkova, E. S., Tsfasman, T., Razin, S. V., & Vassetzky, Y. S. (2014) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-13-249 · Cited by 52
Asaithamby, A., Hu, B., Delgado, O., Ding, L.-H., Story, M. D., Minna, J. D., Shay, J. W., & Chen, D. J. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr149 · Cited by 49
Kassambara, A., Gourzonès, C., Sahota, S. S., Reme, T. X., Moreaux, J., Goldschmidt, H., Constantinou, A., Pasero, P., Hose, D., & Klein, B. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1740 · Cited by 49
Yeast as a model system to study metabolic impact of selenium compounds
Herrero, E., & Wellinger, R. E. (2015) · Microbial Cell · doi:10.15698/mic2015.05.200 · Cited by 49
Douglas, P., Ye, R., Trinkle‐Mulcahy, L., Neal, J. A., Wever, V. D., MORRICE, N. A., Meek, K., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2014) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20140051 · Cited by 49
Writers, Readers, and Erasers of Histone Ubiquitylation in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Smeenk, G., & Mailand, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00122 · Cited by 52
Structural basis for recognition of 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain by TIRR
Dai, Y., Zhang, A., Shan, S., Gong, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04557-2 · Cited by 50
PLK1 targets CtIP to promote microhomology-mediated end joining
Wang, H., Qiu, Z., Liu, B., Wu, Y., Ren, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Hao, S., Li, Z., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky810 · Cited by 50
Hulton, C. H., Costa, E. A., Shah, N., Quintanal-Villalonga, À., Heller, G., de Stanchina, E., Rudin, C. M., & Poirier, J. T. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0040-8 · Cited by 48
DNA damage and tissue repair: What we can learn from planaria
Barghouth, P. G., Thiruvalluvan, M., LeGro, M., & Oviedo, N. J. (2019) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.04.013 · Cited by 48
Discovery and development of novel DNA-PK inhibitors by targeting the unique Ku–DNA interaction
Gavande, N. S., VanderVere-Carozza, P. S., Pawelczak, K. S., Mendoza-Munoz, P. L., Vernon, T. L., Hanakahi, L. A., Summerlin, M., Dynlacht, J. R., Farmer, A. H., Sears, C. R., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa934 · Cited by 46
Genome editing in large animal models
Maynard, L. H., Humbert, O., Peterson, C. W., & Kiem, H. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.026 · Cited by 50
Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis: Challenges and prospects
Sui, H., Xu, X., Su, Y., Gong, Z., Yao, M., Liu, X., Zhang, T., Jiang, Z., Bai, T., Wang, J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1015926 · Cited by 56
Heijink, A. M., Stok, C., Porubskỳ, D., Manolika, E. M., de Kanter, J. K., Kok, Y. P., Everts, M., de Boer, H. R., Audrey, A., Bakker, F. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34519-8 · Cited by 51
Efficient scar-free knock-ins of several kilobases in plants by engineered CRISPR-Cas endonucleases
Schreiber, T., Prange, A., Schäfer, P., Iwen, T., Grützner, R., Marillonnet, S., Lepage, A., Javelle, M., Paul, W., & Tissier, A. F. (2024) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2024.03.013 · Cited by 53
Targeting ubiquitination in disease and therapy
Yang, X., Lan, T., Zhang, B., Tao, X., Qi, W., Xie, K., Cai, Y., Liu, C., Han, J., & Wu, H. M. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02392-8 · Cited by 55
VprBP binds full‐length RAG1 and is required for B‐cell development and V(D)J recombination fidelity
Kassmeier, M. D., Mondal, K., Palmer, V., Raval, P., Kumar, S., Perry, G. A., Anderson, D. K., Ciborowski, P. S., Jackson, S., Xiong, Y., et al. (2011) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.455 · Cited by 48
CDKN2D-WDFY2 Is a Cancer-Specific Fusion Gene Recurrent in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Kannan, K., Coarfa, C., Rajapakshe, K., Hawkins, S. M., Matzuk, M. M., Milosavljevic, A., & Yen, L. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004216 · Cited by 49
The genomic characteristics and cellular origin of chromothripsis
Štorchová, Z., & Kloosterman, W. P. (2016) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.003 · Cited by 51
Zhang, A., Peng, B., Huang, P. C., Chen, J., & Gong, Z. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.777474 · Cited by 48
Wei, P., Lee, C., Du, Z., Schwer, B., Zhang, Y., Kao, J., Zurita, J., & Alt, F. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719907115 · Cited by 51
The role of p38 MAPK pathway in p53 compromised state and telomere mediated DNA damage response
Roy, S., Roy, S., Rana, A., Akhter, Y., Hande, M. P., & Banerjee, B. (2018) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.05.018 · Cited by 48
Fernandes, L. G. V., Guamán, L. P., Vasconcellos, S. A., Heinemann, M. B., Picardeau, M., & Nascimento, A. L. T. O. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37949-x · Cited by 48
A new perspective on oxidation of DNA repair proteins and cancer
Alnajjar, K. S., & Sweasy, J. B. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.006 · Cited by 50
DNA double-strand breaks: a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases
Thadathil, N., Hori, R. T., Xiao, J., & Khan, M. M. (2019) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-019-09617-x · Cited by 51
Structural Insights into the Role of Domain Flexibility in Human DNA Ligase IV
Ochi, T., Wu, Q., Chirgadze, D. Y., Grossmann, J. G., Bolaños-García, V. M., & Blundell, T. L. (2012) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.04.012 · Cited by 49
Structural Basis of DNA Ligase IV-Artemis Interaction in Nonhomologous End-Joining
Ioannes, P. D., Malu, S., Cortés, P., & Aggarwal, A. K. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.004 · Cited by 47
Early steps of double-strand break repair in Bacillus subtilis
Alonso, J. C., Cárdenas, P. P., Sánchez, H., Hejna, J., Suzuki, Y., & Takeyasu, K. (2013) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.12.005 · Cited by 52
Destroying the ring: Freeing DNA from Ku with ubiquitin
Postow, L. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.046 · Cited by 47
Kannan, K., Coarfa, C., Chao, P.-W., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Brinegar, A. E., Hawkins, S. M., Milosavljevic, A., Matzuk, M. M., & Yen, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1501735112 · Cited by 47
Roy, S., Choudhury, S. R., Sengupta, D. N., & Das, K. P. (2013) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.113.219022 · Cited by 47
Ma, W., Halweg, C., Menéndez, D., & Resnick, M. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1118078109 · Cited by 46
Zan, H., Tat, C., Qiu, Z., Taylor, J. R., Guerrero, J. A., Shen, T., & Casali, P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14244 · Cited by 47
Bromodomain proteins: repairing DNA damage within chromatin
Chiu, L.-Y., Gong, F., & Miller, K. M. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0286 · Cited by 49
PAXX and Xlf interplay revealed by impaired CNS development and immunodeficiency of double KO mice
Abramowski, V., Etienne, O., Elsaid, R., Yang, J., Berland, A., Kermasson, L., Roch, B., Musilli, S., Moussu, J.-P., Lipson-Ruffert, K., et al. (2017) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.184 · Cited by 47
Modulation of DNA double-strand break repair as a strategy to improve precise genome editing
Ray, U., & Raghavan, S. C. (2020) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-020-01445-2 · Cited by 46
Therapeutic Targeting of DNA Replication Stress in Cancer
Gu, L., Hickey, R. J., & Malkas, L. H. (2023) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14071346 · Cited by 52
ATM Limits Incorrect End Utilization during Non-Homologous End Joining of Multiple Chromosome Breaks
Bennardo, N., & Stark, J. M. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001194 · Cited by 48
TDP1 promotes assembly of non-homologous end joining protein complexes on DNA
Heo, J., Li, J., Summerlin, M., Hays, A., Katyal, S., McKinnon, P. J., Nitiss, K. C., Nitiss, J. L., & Hanakahi, L. A. (2015) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.03.003 · Cited by 49
Ruiz, J. F., Gómez‐González, B., & Aguilera, A. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002009 · Cited by 46
Stanlie, A., Begum, N. A., Akiyama, H., & Honjo, T. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002675 · Cited by 46
Oh, S., Wang, Y., Zimbric, J., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1326 · Cited by 46
Reid, D. A., Conlin, M. P., Yin, Y., Chang, H. H., Watanabe, G., Lieber, M. R., Ramsden, D. A., & Rothenberg, E. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1221 · Cited by 46
Self-citationWang, K., Gong, Q., & Ye, X. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03464-4 · Cited by 49
ATM: Translating the DNA Damage Response to Adaptive Immunity
Weitering, T. J., Takada, S., Weemaes, C. M. R., van Schouwenburg, P. A., & van der Burg, M. (2021) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2021.02.001 · Cited by 47
Molecular Mechanisms of IgE Class Switch Recombination
Tong, P., & Wesemann, D. R. (2015) · Current topics in microbiology and immunology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13725-4_2 · Cited by 46
Pluripotent stem cells and gene therapy
Šimara, P., Motl, J. A., & Kaufman, D. S. (2013) · Translational research · doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2013.01.001 · Cited by 49
Ludovici, G. M., de Souza, S. O., Chierici, A., Cascone, M. G., d’Errico, F., & Malizia, A. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Radioactivity · doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106375 · Cited by 49
Advances in genomics and genome editing for breeding next generation of fruit and nut crops
Savadi, S., Mangalassery, S., & Sandesh, M. S. (2021) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.09.001 · Cited by 47
CRISPR Cas system: A strategic approach in detection of nucleic acids
Fapohunda, F. O., Huang, D., Qiu, S., Qiao, S., Pan, Y., Shi, S., Wang, H., & Lü, P. (2022) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127000 · Cited by 46
53BP1: Keeping It under Control, Even at a Distance from DNA Damage
Rass, E., Willaume, S., & Bertrand, P. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13122390 · Cited by 51
Neural Tube Defects and Folate Deficiency: Is DNA Repair Defective?
Wang, X., Yu, J., & Wang, J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24032220 · Cited by 48
C-to-G editing generates double-strand breaks causing deletion, transversion and translocation
Huang, M. E., Qin, Y., Shang, Y., Hao, Q., Zhan, C., Lian, C., Luo, S., Liu, L. D., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01342-2 · Cited by 45
Rass, E., Chandramouly, G., Zha, S., Alt, F. W., & Xie, A. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.445825 · Cited by 43
Becker, A., Durante, M., Taucher-Scholz, G., & Jakob, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092640 · Cited by 48
Male-driven de novo mutations in haploid germ cells
Grégoire, M.-C., Massonneau, J., Simard, O., Gouraud, A., Brazeau, M.-A., Arguin, M., Leduc, F., & Boissonneault, G. (2013) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gat022 · Cited by 44
Lan, J., Hu, M., Gao, C., Alshawabkeh, A. N., & Gu, A. Z. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00371 · Cited by 47
Lee, K. Y., Im, J., Shibata, E., & Dutta, A. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.021 · Cited by 46
The HERV-K accessory protein Np9 controls viability and migration of teratocarcinoma cells
Chan, S. M., Sapir, T., Park, S. S., Rual, J.-F. M., Contreras-Galindo, R., Reiner, O., & Markovitz, D. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212970 · Cited by 48
Ocular delivery of CRISPR/Cas genome editing components for treatment of eye diseases
Yu, W., & Wu, Z. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.011 · Cited by 48
DNA double-strand break repair: Putting zinc fingers on the sore spot
Singh, J. K., & van Attikum, H. (2020) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.09.003 · Cited by 44
Fijen, C., & Rothenberg, E. (2021) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103170 · Cited by 43
Meiotic Cas9 expression mediates gene conversion in the male and female mouse germline
Weitzel, A. J., Grunwald, H. A., Weber, C. J., Levina, R., Gantz, V. M., Hedrick, S. Μ., Bier, E., & Cooper, K. L. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001478 · Cited by 45
PD-1/PD-L1 and DNA Damage Response in Cancer
Kciuk, M., Kołat, D., Kałuzińska‐Kołat, Ż., Gawrysiak, M., Drozda, R., Çelik, İ., & Kontek, R. (2023) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells12040530 · Cited by 46
Martínez‐Pérez, M., Aparicio, F., Arribas‐Hernández, L., Tankmar, M. D., Rennie, S., von Bülow, S., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., Brodersen, P., & Pallás, V. (2023) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2022113378 · Cited by 44
TALE: A tale of genome editing
Zhang, M., Wang, F., Li, S., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., & Xu, X. (2013) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 44
Lee, B.-S., Gapud, E. J., Zhang, S., Dorsett, Y., Bredemeyer, A. L., George, R., Callén, E., Daniel, J. A., Osipovich, O. A., Oltz, E. M., et al. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00308-13 · Cited by 44
Zou, L.-H., Shang, Z., Tan, W., Liu, X.-D., Xu, Q.-Z., Song, M. S., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Zhang, S.-M., Yu, L., et al. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.3137 · Cited by 44
Lan, J., Gou, N., Rahman, S. M., Gao, C., He, M., & Gu, A. Z. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05097 · Cited by 44
Chen, X., Li, W., Wu, X., Zhang, H., Chen, L., Zhang, P.-Y., Liu, L., Ma, D., Chen, T., Zhou, L., et al. (2017) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgx059 · Cited by 44
Roidos, P., Sungalee, S., Benfatto, S., Serçin, Ö., Stütz, A. M., Abdollahi, A., Mauer, J., Zenke, F. T., Korbel, J. O., & Mardin, B. R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17962-3 · Cited by 43
Yachida, N., Yoshihara, K., Yamaguchi, M., Suda, K., Tamura, R., & Enomoto, T. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13061439 · Cited by 48
The Chromatin Landscape Channels DNA Double-Strand Breaks to Distinct Repair Pathways
Chen, Z., & Tyler, J. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.909696 · Cited by 44
Qian, D., Zhang, B., Zeng, X.-L., Blanc, J. M. L., Guo, Y.-H., Xue, C., Jiang, C., Wang, H.-H., Zhao, T.-S., Meng, M.-B., et al. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.416 · Cited by 44
Belle, J. I., & Nijnik, A. (2014) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.03.004 · Cited by 46
Less-well known functions of cyclin/CDK complexes
Palmer, N., & Kaldis, P. (2020) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.003 · Cited by 44
Programmed Genome Rearrangements in Tetrahymena
Yao, M.-C., Chao, J., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0012-2014 · Cited by 43
Stefanou, D. T., Bamias, A., Episkopou, H. G., Kyrtopoulos, S. Α., Likka, M., Kalampokas, T., Fotiou, S., Gavalas, N. G., Sfikakis, P. P., Dimopoulos, M. A., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117654 · Cited by 43
Fawcett, J. A., Rouzé, P., & de Peer, Y. V. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr254 · Cited by 44
RAG2 mutants alter DSB repair pathway choice in vivo and illuminate the nature of ‘alternative NHEJ’
Gigi, V., Lewis, S. M., Shestova, O. E., Mijušković, M., Deriano, L., Meng, W., Prak, E. T. L., & Roth, D. B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku295 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Lieber, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lieber, Michael R.
- ORCID
- Lieber, Michael R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-06-07
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-211
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- PMC
- PMC3079308
- OpenAlex
- W2164995160
- Cited by
- 2,882
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 238 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 201 · 2017: 215 · 2016: 212 · 2015: 183 · 2014: 199 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 148
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA100504)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand break repair, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, DNA ligase IV, DNA polymerase IV, chromosomal translocation, V(D)J recombination, class switch recombination, immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA Repair, Humans, DNA Ligases, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review