The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining Pathway
Open accessAbstract
Double-strand DNA breaks are common events in eukaryotic cells, and there are two major pathways for repairing them: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). The various causes of double-strand breaks (DSBs) result in a diverse chemistry of DNA ends that must be repaired. Across NHEJ evolution, the enzymes of the NHEJ pathway exhibit a remarkable degree of structural tolerance in the range of DNA end substrate configurations upon which they can act. In vertebrate cells, the nuclease, DNA polymerases, and ligase of NHEJ are the most mechanistically flexible and multifunctional enzymes in each of their classes. Unlike repair pathways for more defined lesions, NHEJ repair enzymes act iteratively, act in any order, and can function independently of one another at each of the two DNA ends being joined. NHEJ is critical not only for the repair of pathologic DSBs as in chromosomal translocations, but also for the repair of physiologic DSBs created during variable (diversity) joining [V(D)J] recombination and class switch recombination (CSR). Therefore, patients lacking normal NHEJ are not only sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR), but also severely immunodeficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Breakpoints of some non-recurrent deletion CNVs have sequences with very short (2–20 basepairs) stretches of nucleotide identity. These are predicted to be formed by an alternative microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ) mechanism (Lieber, 2010).”
From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Lieber, 2010
In the citing paper
“DNA double-strand break repair or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repairs breaks induced by ionizing radiation (IR), oxidative free radicals, misappropriate enzymatic action at sensitive sites, inhibition of topoisomerases, and other mechanical stresses [54].”
From Integration of DNA damage and repair with murine double-minute 2 (Mdm2) in tumorigenesis (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydroperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs.
Chance, B., Sies, H., & Boveris, A. (1979) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.527 · Cited by 5,827
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. (2005) · doi:10.1128/9781555816704 · Cited by 5,683
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage
Falck, J., Coates, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03442 · Cited by 1,304
Meiotic Chromosomes: Integrating Structure and Function
Zickler, D., & Kleckner, N. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603 · Cited by 1,256
Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair
Walker, J. R., Corpina, R. A., & Goldberg, J. D. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35088000 · Cited by 1,216
Walker, E. H., Pacold, M. E., Perišić, O., Stephens, L., Hawkins, P. T., Wymann, M. P., & Williams, R. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00089-4 · Cited by 1,211
Ma, Y., Pannicke, U., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00671-2 · Cited by 1,166
Self-citationATM and DNA-PK Function Redundantly to Phosphorylate H2AX after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
Stiff, T., O’Driscoll, M., Rief, N., Iwabuchi, K., Löbrich, M., & Jeggo, P. A. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3207 · Cited by 1,050
The Mechanism and Regulation of Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination
Bassing, C. H., Swat, W., & Alt, F. W. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00675-x · Cited by 1,006
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Martin GM, 1985, Isr. J. Med. Sci., 21, 296
- Wilson TE, 2009, Wiley Encyclopedia of Chemical Biology, 3, 423
- Welzel N, 2001, Cancer Res., 61, 1629
- van der Burg M, 2009, J. Clin. Investig., 119, 91
- Kornberg A, 1992, DNA Replication
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,005
Yang, H., Ren, S., Yu, S., Pan, H., Li, T., Ge, S., Zhang, J., & Xia, N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21186461 · Cited by 237
Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK stimulates Cas9-mediated genome editing
Robert, F., Barbeau, M., Ethier, S. D., Dostie, J., & Pelletier, J. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0215-6 · Cited by 268
Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR-cas9 systems enable specific editing of the human genome
Müller, M., Lee, C. M., Gasiunas, G., Davis, T. H., Cradick, T. J., Siksnys, V., Bao, G., Cathomen, T., & Mussolino, C. (2016) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2015.218 · Cited by 254
Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX
Scully, R., & Xie, A. (2013) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.007 · Cited by 277
The Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants
Ruhlman, T. A., & Jansen, R. K. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-995-6_1 · Cited by 253
He, J., Ford, H. C., Carroll, J., Ding, S., Fearnley, I. M., & Walker, J. E. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702357114 · Cited by 251
Mladenov, E., Magin, S., Soni, A., & Iliakis, G. E. (2016) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.03.003 · Cited by 271
Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly
Seol, J.-H., Shim, E. Y., & Lee, S. E. (2017) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.002 · Cited by 249
Histone methylation and the DNA damage response
Gong, F., & Miller, K. M. (2017) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.09.003 · Cited by 265
Biological effects of radiation on cancer cells
Wang, J., Wang, H., & Qian, H. (2018) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-018-0167-4 · Cited by 247
Yan, S., Sorrell, M., & Berman, Z. (2014) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1666-4 · Cited by 247
BRCA2 controls DNA:RNA hybrid level at DSBs by mediating RNase H2 recruitment
D’Alessandro, G., Whelan, D. R., Howard, S. M., Vitelli, V., Renaudin, X., Adamowicz, M., Iannelli, F., Jones-Weinert, C. W., Lee, M.-Y., Matti, V., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07799-2 · Cited by 246
Regulation of DNA End Joining, Resection, and Immunoglobulin Class Switch Recombination by 53BP1
Bothmer, A., Robbiani, D. F., Di Virgilio, M., Bunting, S. F., Klein, I. A., Feldhahn, N., Barlow, J., Chen, H.-T., Bosque, D., Callen, E., et al. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.019 · Cited by 244
DNAPKcs-dependent arrest of RNA polymerase II transcription in the presence of DNA breaks
Pankotai, T., Bonhomme, C., Chen, D., & Soutoglou, E. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2224 · Cited by 239
Oxidatively generated complex DNA damage: Tandem and clustered lesions
Cadet, J., Ravanat, J.-L., TavernaPorro, M., Menoni, H., & Angelov, D. (2012) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.005 · Cited by 233
Introduction to Radiobiology of Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
Pouget, J., Lozza, C., Deshayes, E., Boudousq, V., & Navarro‐Teulon, I. (2015) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2015.00012 · Cited by 256
Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, Y., & Takemoto, T. (2016) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.07.017 · Cited by 234
Do DNA Double-Strand Breaks Drive Aging?
White, R. R., & Vijg, J. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.004 · Cited by 232
Single Cas9 nickase induced generation of NRAMP1 knockin cattle with reduced off-target effects
Gao, Y., Wu, H., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Chen, L., Li, Q., Cui, C., Liu, X., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1144-4 · Cited by 246
Maintaining genome stability in the nervous system
McKinnon, P. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3537 · Cited by 229
Williams, G. J., Lees‐Miller, S. P., & Tainer, J. A. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.10.001 · Cited by 236
The Repair and Signaling Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Goodarzi, A. A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2013) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407676-1.00001-9 · Cited by 245
Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by mammalian alternative end-joining pathways
Sallmyr, A., & Tomkinson, A. E. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.tm117.000375 · Cited by 250
Fan, C., Liu, W.-L., Cao, H., Wen, C., Chen, L., & Jiang, G. (2013) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.388 · Cited by 236
Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society
Langie, S. A. S., Koppen, G., Desaulniers, D. M., Al‐Mulla, F., Al-Temaimi, R. A., Amedei, A., Azqueta, A., Bisson, W. H., Brown, D. G., Brunborg, G., et al. (2015) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgv031 · Cited by 240
Sturzenegger, A., Burdová, K., Kanagaraj, R., Levikova, M., Pinto, C., Ćejka, P., & Janščák, P. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.578823 · Cited by 242
Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway
Stinson, B. M., & Loparo, J. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-080320-110356 · Cited by 223
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein
Tang, L., Zeng, Y., Du, H., Gong, M., Peng, J., Zhang, B., Lei, M., Zhao, F., Wang, W., Li, X., et al. (2017) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-017-1299-z · Cited by 220
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Inhibitors as Cancer Therapeutics
Srivastava, M., & Raghavan, S. C. (2015) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.11.013 · Cited by 230
Biological plasticity rescues target activity in CRISPR knock outs
Smits, A. H., Ziebell, F., Joberty, G., Zinn, N., Mueller, W. F., Clauder-Münster, S., Eberhard, D., Fälth Savitski, M., Grandi, P., Jakob, P., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0614-5 · Cited by 219
Konecny, G. E., & Kristeleit, R. S. (2016) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.311 · Cited by 228
In vivo delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics: Progress and challenges
Behr, M., Zhou, J., Xu, B., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.020 · Cited by 210
Chen, W., McKenna, A., Schreiber, J., Haeussler, M., Yin, Y., Agarwal, V., Noble, W. S., & Shendure, J. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz487 · Cited by 216
Nuclear position dictates DNA repair pathway choice
Lemaître, C., Grabarz, A., Tsouroula, K., Andronov, L., Furst, A., Pankotai, T., Heyer, V., Rogier, M., Attwood, K. M., Kessler, P., et al. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.248369.114 · Cited by 209
B Cell Development and Maturation
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Burrows, P. D., & Wang, J. O. (2020) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3532-1_1 · Cited by 217
Early neuronal accumulation of DNA double strand breaks in Alzheimer’s disease
Shanbhag, N. M., Evans, M. D., Mao, W., Nana, A. L., Seeley, W. W., Adame, A., Rissman, R. A., Masliah, E., & Mucke, L. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0723-5 · Cited by 214
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in the DNA-damage response
Lans, H., Marteijn, J. A. F., & Vermeulen, W. (2012) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-5-4 · Cited by 230
Spaas, J., van Veggel, L., Schepers, M., Tiane, A., van Horssen, J., Wilson, D. M., Moya, P. R., Piccart, E., Hellings, N., Eijnde, B. O., et al. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03802-0 · Cited by 224
Jiang, W., Crowe, J. L., Liu, X., Nakajima, S., Wang, Y., Li, C., Lee, B. J., Dubois, R. L., Liu, C., Yu, X., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.024 · Cited by 229
Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: Exploiting a synthetic lethal strategy in the clinic
Yap, T. A., Sandhu, S. K., Carden, C. P., & Bono, J. S. D. (2011) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20095 · Cited by 218
ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases—the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition ≠ deletion
Menolfi, D., & Zha, S. (2020) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-020-0376-x · Cited by 227
Genome editing of CXCR4 by CRISPR/cas9 confers cells resistant to HIV-1 infection
Hou, P., Chen, S., Wang, S., Yu, X., Chen, Y. Z., Jiang, M., Zhuang, K., Ho, W., Hou, W., Huang, J. Y., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15577 · Cited by 214
Surrogate reporters for enrichment of cells with nuclease-induced mutations
Kim, H., Um, E., Cho, S., Jung, C., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1733 · Cited by 207
Gillespie, K. A., Mehta, K. P. M., Laimins, L. A., & Moody, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00247-12 · Cited by 211
Repairing breaks in the plant genome: the importance of keeping it together
Waterworth, W. M., Drury, G. E., Bray, C. M., & West, C. E. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03926.x · Cited by 213
Kloosterman, W. P., Hoogstraat, M., Paling, O., Tavakoli-Yaraki, M., Renkens, I., Vermaat, J. S., van Roosmalen, M. J., van Lieshout, S., Nijman, I. J., Roessingh, W., et al. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r103 · Cited by 204
CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in the rat via direct injection of one-cell embryos
Shao, Y., Guan, Y., Wang, L., Qiu, Z., Liu, M., Chen, Y., Wu, L., Li, Y., Ma, X., Liu, M., et al. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.171 · Cited by 207
Evaluation of TCR Gene Editing Achieved by TALENs, CRISPR/Cas9, and megaTAL Nucleases
Osborn, M. J., Webber, B. R., Knipping, F., Lonetree, C.-L., Tennis, N., DeFeo, A. P., McElroy, A. N., Starker, C. G., Lee, C., Merkel, S., et al. (2016) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2015.197 · Cited by 201
In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing
Newby, G. A., & Liu, D. R. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.002 · Cited by 195
Iliakis, G. E., Murmann-Konda, T., & Soni, A. (2015) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.07.001 · Cited by 199
Kloosterman, W. P., Tavakoli‐Yaraki, M., van Roosmalen, M. J., van Binsbergen, E., Renkens, I., Duran, K. J., Ballarati, L., Vergult, S., Giardino, D. L., Hansson, K. B. M., et al. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.009 · Cited by 204
DNA Unwinding Is the Primary Determinant of CRISPR-Cas9 Activity
Gong, S., Yu, H. H., Johnson, K. A., & Taylor, D. W. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.041 · Cited by 200
CRISPR/Cas9-based precise excision of SlHyPRP1 domain(s) to obtain salt stress-tolerant tomato
Tran, M. T., Doan, D. T. H., Kim, J., Sung, Y. W., Sung, Y. W., Das, S., Kim, E., Son, G. H., Kim, S. H., Vu, T. V., et al. (2020) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02622-z · Cited by 203
Powers, N. R., Parvanov, E. D., Baker, C. L., Walker, M., Petkov, P. M., & Paigen, K. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006146 · Cited by 203
Validation of the γH2AX biomarker for genotoxicity assessment: a review
Kopp, B., Khoury, L., & Audebert, M. (2019) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02511-9 · Cited by 199
Prime editing: advances and therapeutic applications
Zhao, Z., Shang, P., Mohanraju, P., & Geijsen, N. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.03.004 · Cited by 205
CtIP promotes microhomology-mediated alternative end joining during class-switch recombination
Lee-Theilen, M., Matthews, A. J., Kelly, D., Zheng, S., & Chaudhuri, J. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1942 · Cited by 215
Rac1 activates non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway to induce chemoresistance of breast cancer
Li, Q., Qin, T., Bi, Z., Hong, H., Ding, L., Chen, J., Wu, W., Lin, X., Fu, W., Zheng, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15308-7 · Cited by 192
Molecular Mechanism of V(D)J Recombination from Synaptic RAG1-RAG2 Complex Structures
Ru, H., Chambers, M. G., Fu, T., Tong, A., Liao, M., & Wu, H. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.055 · Cited by 200
Zhang, Y., Unnikrishnan, A., Deepa, S. S., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Ikeno, Y., Sosnowska, D., Van Remmen, H., & Richardson, A. (2017) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2016.10.014 · Cited by 185
“In addition, we showed that dietary restriction (DR), which is a manipulation that retards aging in rodents, increased the lifespan of the Sod1−/− mice to that of normal, wild type (WT) mice.”
The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation
Ottaviani, D., LeCain, M., & Sheer, D. (2014) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2014.01.001 · Cited by 192
Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era
Salsman, J., & Dellaire, G. (2016) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2016-0137 · Cited by 193
The Response to and Repair of RAG-Mediated DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Helmink, B. A., & Sleckman, B. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101320 · Cited by 199
The Role of the Core Non-Homologous End Joining Factors in Carcinogenesis and Cancer
Sishc, B. J., & Davis, A. J. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9070081 · Cited by 178
Xing, M., Yang, M., Huo, W., Feng, F., Wei, L., Jiang, W., Ning, S., Yan, Z., Li, W., Wang, Q., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7233 · Cited by 180
Maidarti, M., Anderson, R. A., & Telfer, E. E. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9010200 · Cited by 184
Lo, T., Pickle, C. S., Lin, S., Ralston, E. J., Gurling, M., Schartner, C., Bian, Q., Doudna, J. A., & Meyer, B. J. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.155382 · Cited by 180
Mismatch Repair during Homologous and Homeologous RecombinationPreprint
Spies, M., & Fishel, R. A. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a022657 · Cited by 178
The rise and rise of mitochondrial DNA mutations
Lawless, C., Greaves, L. C., Reeve, A. K., Turnbull, D. M., & Vincent, A. E. (2020) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.200061 · Cited by 174
The Transcription Factor FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1)
Wierstra, I. (2013) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407173-5.00004-2 · Cited by 180
megaTALs: a rare-cleaving nuclease architecture for therapeutic genome engineering
Boissel, S., Jarjour, J., Astrakhan, A., Adey, A., Gouble, A., Duchateau, P. N., Shendure, J., Stoddard, B. L., Certo, M. T., Baker, D. A., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1224 · Cited by 177
A Human Short Open Reading Frame (sORF)-encoded Polypeptide That Stimulates DNA End Joining
Slavoff, S. A., Heo, J., Budnik, B., Hanakahi, L. A., & Saghatelian, A. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c113.533968 · Cited by 181
Regulation of DNA Pairing in Homologous RecombinationPreprint
Daley, J. M., Gaines, W. A., Kwon, Y., & Sung, P. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017954 · Cited by 178
Homology and enzymatic requirements of microhomology-dependent alternative end joining
Sharma, S., Javadekar, S. M., Pandey, M., Srivastava, M., Kumari, R., & Raghavan, S. C. (2015) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.58 · Cited by 172
Liu, Z., Chen, S., Jin, X., Wang, Q., Yang, K., Li, C., Xiao, Q., Hou, P., Liu, S., Wu, S., et al. (2017) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-017-0174-2 · Cited by 131
Mammalian DNA repair: HATs and HDACs make their mark through histone acetylation
Gong, F., & Miller, K. M. (2013) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.002 · Cited by 175
Santos, A. L., Sinha, S., & Lindner, A. B. (2018) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2018/1941285 · Cited by 168
Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response
Panier, S., & Durocher, D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3659 · Cited by 177
TALEN or Cas9 – Rapid, Efficient and Specific Choices for Genome Modifications
Wei, C., Liu, J., Yu, Z., Zhang, B., Gao, G., & Jiao, R. (2013) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.013 · Cited by 171
DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy and Resistance: Challenges and Opportunities
Jurkovičová, D., Neophytou, C. M., Gašparović, A. Č., & Gonçalves, A. C. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232314672 · Cited by 175
Bacterial DNA repair: recent insights into the mechanism of RecBCD, AddAB and AdnAB
Wigley, D. B. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2917 · Cited by 169
Reid, D. A., Keegan, S., Leo‐Macías, A., Watanabe, G., Strande, N. T., Chang, H. H., Oksuz, B. A., Fenyö, D., Lieber, M. R., Ramsden, D. A., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420115112 · Cited by 178
Self-citationHeat shock proteins and DNA repair mechanisms: an updated overview
Sottile, M. L., & Nadin, S. B. (2017) · Cell Stress and Chaperones · doi:10.1007/s12192-017-0843-4 · Cited by 171
Hyun, Y., Kim, J., Cho, S. W., Choi, Y., Kim, J., & Coupland, G. (2014) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-014-2180-5 · Cited by 171
Alternative end-joining pathway(s): Bricolage at DNA breaks
Frit, P., Barboule, N., Yuan, Y., Gómez, D., & Calsou, P. (2014) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.007 · Cited by 187
Basu, S. P., Aryan, A., Overcash, J. M., Samuel, G. H., Anderson, M. A. E., Dahlem, T. J., Myles, K. M., & Adelman, Z. N. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502370112 · Cited by 170
A histone H3K36 chromatin switch coordinates DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice
Pai, C., Deegan, R. S., Subramanian, L., Gal, C., Sarkar, S., Blaikley, E., Walker, C. A., Hulme, L., Bernhard, E. J., Codlin, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5091 · Cited by 176
Krietsch, J., Caron, M., Gagné, J., Ethier, C., Vignard, J., Vincent, M., Rouleau, M., Hendzel, M. J., Poirier, G. G., & Masson, J. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks798 · Cited by 166
Sliding sleeves of XRCC4–XLF bridge DNA and connect fragments of broken DNA
Brouwer, I., Sitters, G., Candelli, A., Heerema, S. J., Heller, I., de Melo, A. J., Zhang, H., Normanno, D., Modesti, M., Peterman, E. J. G., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18643 · Cited by 166
Zebrafish Genome Engineering Using the CRISPR–Cas9 System
Li, M., Zhao, L., Page-McCaw, P., & Chen, W. (2016) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2016.10.005 · Cited by 181
The biogenesis of chromosome translocations
Roukos, V., & Misteli, T. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2941 · Cited by 174
Winship, A., Stringer, J. M., Liew, S. H., & Hutt, K. J. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy002 · Cited by 165
Zhang, F., Seeman, P., Liu, P., Weterman, M. A. J., Gonzaga-Jauregui, C. G., Towne, C. F., Batish, S. D., Vriendt, E. D., Jonghe, P. D., Rautenstrauss, B. W., et al. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.001 · Cited by 168
Genome Stability and Evolution: Attempting a Holistic View
Schubert, I. A., & Vu, G. T. H. (2016) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.003 · Cited by 164
Raschmanová, H., Weninger, A., Glieder, A., Kovar, K., & Vogl, T. J. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.006 · Cited by 167
Genome editing in plants via designed zinc finger nucleases
Petolino, J. F. (2015) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-015-9663-3 · Cited by 167
Wang, C., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2013) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.011 · Cited by 177
Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer
Oei, A. L., Kok, H. P., Oei, S. B., Horsman, M. R., Stalpers, L. J. A., Franken, N. A. P., & Crezee, J. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.01.003 · Cited by 163
Genome engineering using the CRISPR/Cas system
Horii, T. (2014) · World Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.5496/wjmg.v4.i3.69 · Cited by 167
Uncovering the functional diversity of rare CRISPR-Cas systems with deep terascale clustering
Altae-Tran, H., Kannan, S., Suberski, A. J., Mears, K. S., Demircioglu, F. E., Moeller, L., Kocalar, S., Oshiro, R., Makarova, K. S., Macrae, R. K., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adi1910 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Lieber, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lieber, Michael R.
- ORCID
- Lieber, Michael R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-06-07
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-211
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- PMC
- PMC3079308
- OpenAlex
- W2164995160
- Cited by
- 2,882
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 238 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 201 · 2017: 215 · 2016: 212 · 2015: 183 · 2014: 199 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 148
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA100504)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand break repair, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, DNA ligase IV, DNA polymerase IV, chromosomal translocation, V(D)J recombination, class switch recombination, immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA Repair, Humans, DNA Ligases, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review