The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Repair and Regeneration
Abstract
▪ Abstract Nerve regeneration is a complex biological phenomenon. In the peripheral nervous system, nerves can regenerate on their own if injuries are small. Larger injuries must be surgically treated, typically with nerve grafts harvested from elsewhere in the body. Spinal cord injury is more complicated, as there are factors in the body that inhibit repair. Unfortunately, a solution to completely repair spinal cord injury has not been found. Thus, bioengineering strategies for the peripheral nervous system are focused on alternatives to the nerve graft, whereas efforts for spinal cord injury are focused on creating a permissive environment for regeneration. Fortunately, recent advances in neuroscience, cell culture, genetic techniques, and biomaterials provide optimism for new treatments for nerve injuries. This article reviews the nervous system physiology, the factors that are critical for nerve repair, and the current approaches that are being explored to aid peripheral nerve regeneration and spinal cord repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process
Lauffenburger, D. A., & Horwitz, A. F. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81280-5 · Cited by 3,915
Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Bradbury, E. J., Moon, L. D. F., Popat, R. J., King, V. R., Bennett, G. S., Patel, P. N., Fawcett, J. W., & McMahon, S. B. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416636a · Cited by 2,357
Changing potency by spontaneous fusion
Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Evans, E. P., & Smith, A. G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature729 · Cited by 1,494
Stoll, G., Griffin, J. W., Li, C. Y., & Trapp, B. D. (1989) · Journal of Neurocytology · doi:10.1007/bf01187086 · Cited by 556
Endogenous progenitors remyelinate demyelinated axons in the adult CNS
Gensert, J. M., & Goldman, J. E. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80359-1 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering
Shin, S. R., Li, Y.-C., Jang, H. L., Khoshakhlagh, P., Akbari, M., Nasajpour, A., Zhang, Y. S., Tamayol, A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.007 · Cited by 721
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630
Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.003 · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, C. E., & Leach, J. B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 293-347
- ISSN
- 1523-9829 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4274
- OpenAlex
- W2107514110
- Cited by
- 1,237
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Repair and Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.011303.120731
- The paper
- Schmidt, C. E., & Leach, J. B. (2003). Neural Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Repair and Regeneration. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.011303.120731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
