Cited by 234Astro and Planetary ScienceGeological and Geochemical AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE Hf-W ISOTOPIC SYSTEM AND THE ORIGIN OF THE EARTH AND MOON

Jacobsen, Stein B.·2005·Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences

Abstract

▪ Abstract The Earth has a radiogenic W-isotopic composition compared to chondrites, demonstrating that it formed while 182 Hf (half-life 9 Myr) was extant in Earth and decaying to 182 W. This implies that Earth underwent early and rapid accretion and core formation, with most of the accumulation occurring in ∼10 Myr, and concluding approximately 30 Myr after the origin of the Solar System. The Hf-W data for lunar samples can be reconciled with a major Moon-forming impact that terminated the terrestrial accretion process ∼30 Myr after the origin of the Solar System. The suggestion that the proto-Earth to impactor mass ratio was 7:3 and occurred during accretion is inconsistent with the W isotope data. The W isotope data is satisfactorily modeled with a Mars-sized impactor on proto-Earth (proto-Earth to impactor ratio of 9:1) to form the Moon at ∼30 Myr.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122614

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Cameron AGW, 1976, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 7, 120
  2. Foley CN, 2004, Lunar Planet. Sci., 35, A1879
  3. Foley CN, 2003, Lunar Planet. Sci., 34, A2217
  4. Harper CL, 1994, Lunar Planet. Sci., 25, 509
  5. Harper CL, 1994, Meteoritics, 29, 471
  6. Harper CL, 1991, Lunar Planet. Sci., 22, 515
  7. Jacobsen SB, 1999, Lunar Planet. Sci., 30, A1978
  8. Jacobsen SB, 1998, Lunar Planet. Sci., 29, 1852
  9. Jacobsen SB, 2004, Lunar Planet. Sci., 35, A1638
  10. Palme H, 1981, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 12, 949
  11. Rammensee W, 1977, Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf, 8, 399
  12. Srinivasan G, 2000, Lunar Planet. Sci, 31, A1795
  13. Wetherill GW, 1986, Origin of the Moon, 519
  14. Yin QZ, 2003, Lunar Planet. Sci., 34, A1857
  15. Yin QZ, 2003, Lunar Planet. Sci., 34, A1510
  16. Yin QZ, 2002, Lunar Planet. Sci, 33, A1700
  17. Yin QZ, 1999, Lunar Planet. Sci., 30, A2049

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacobsen, S. B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobsen, Stein B.
Venue
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Published
2005-05-31
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
531-570
ISSN
  • 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4495
OpenAlex
W2133510984
Cited by
234
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
tungsten isotopes, Hf isotopes, Earth formation, Moon formation, giant impact hypothesis, core formation, radiogenic isotopes, chondrites, Moon-forming impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review