Cited by 202Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Origin and evolution of the atmospheres of early Venus, Earth and Mars

Lammer, Helmut, Zerkle, Aubrey L., Gebauer, Stefanie, Tosi, Nicola, Noack, Lena, Scherf, Manuel, Pilat-Lohinger, Elke, Güdel, Manuel +3 more·2018·The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00159-018-0108-y

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cold trap might not have existed continuously during the Archean eon due to fluctuations to very low total atmospheric surface pressures.

    “The cold trap, however, might not have existed continuously during the Archean eon due to fluctuations to very low total atmospheric surface pressures (Som et al. 2016; Lammer et al. 2018; St¨ ueken et al. 2020.”
  • N2 likely was outgassed and built up during the Archean eon and became the main atmospheric species besides CO2.

    “N 2 likely has been outgassed and built up during the Archean eon (Mikhail and Sverjensky 2014; Som et al. 2016; Lammer et al. 2018; Lammer et al. 2019; St¨ ueken et al. 2020; Sproß et al. 2021), and became the main atmospheric species besides CO 2 .”
  • The very small atmospheric 14N/15N fractionation compared to the deep mantle suggests only minor escape of nitrogen.

    “the very small atmospheric 14 N/ 15 N fractionation compared to the deep mantle (Cartigny and Marty 2013; F¨ uri and Marty 2015) on the other hand suggests only minor escape of nitrogen (Lammer et al. 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lammer, H., Zerkle, A. L., Gebauer, S., Tosi, N., Noack, L., Scherf, M., Pilat-Lohinger, E., Güdel, M., Grenfell, J. L., Godolt, M., & Nikolaou, A.
Affiliations
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Lammer, Helmut
Venue
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
Published
2018-05-10
Volume
26
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0935-4956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0754
OpenAlex
W2801411495
Cited by
202
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 4
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
Venus, Earth, Mars, protoplanetary disks, magma ocean solidification, plate tectonics, atmospheric oxygenation, greenhouse gases, faint young Sun paradox, Great Oxidation Event, habitable exoplanets, atmospheric escape, extreme ultraviolet radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review