The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Kinship Theory of Genomic Imprinting
Abstract
▪ Abstract The inclusive fitness effect attributable to an allele can be divided into an effect on matrilineal kin when the allele is maternally derived and an effect on patrilineal kin when paternally derived. However, the allele is not subject to selection on its effects on patrilineal kin when maternally derived nor on its effects on matrilineal kin when paternally derived. As a result, natural selection may favor alleles with effects that differ, depending on the allele's parental origin. At autosomal loci, this process is predicted to lead to the silencing of alleles when inherited from one or the other parent. At X-linked loci subject to random X inactivation, the process is predicted to lead to quantitative differences of expression between maternal and paternal alleles but not to complete silencing of one allele. The implications of this theory and some challenges to the theory are reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 · Cited by 4,144
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Production of clones of homozygous diploid zebra fish (Brachydanio rerio)
Streisinger, G., Walker, C., Dower, N., Knauber, D., & Singer, F. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/291293a0 · Cited by 1,281
Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy
Haig, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418300 · Cited by 1,253 · cited 1×
“Moreover, theories based on genetic conflicts can explain why trophoblast is often invasive (16), whereas this is merely accepted without explanation in Varmuza & Mann’s hypothesis.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAltruism and Related Phenomena, Mainly in Social Insects
Hamilton, W. D. (1972) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.03.110172.001205 · Cited by 1,143
TAKAGI, N., & SASAKI, M. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/256640a0 · Cited by 791
Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function
Skuse, D. H., James, R. S., Bishop, D. V. M., Coppin, B., Dalton, P., Aamodt-Leeper, G., Bacarese-Hamilton, M., Creswell, C., McGurk, R., & Jacobs, P. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42706 · Cited by 747
Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis.
Marahrens, Y., Panning, B., Dausman, J., Strauss, W., & Jaenisch, R. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.2.156 · Cited by 734
Bartolomei, M. S., & Tilghman, S. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.493 · Cited by 631
Cited by
Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects
ULLER, T. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005 · Cited by 624
Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation
Werren, J. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102343108 · Cited by 444
Beyond society: the evolution of organismality
Queller, D. C., & Strassmann, J. E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0095 · Cited by 440
T HE E VOLUTION OF A LTERNATIVE G ENETIC S YSTEMS IN I NSECTS
Normark, B. B. (2003) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112703 · Cited by 382
Genomic Imprinting and Kinship: How Good is the Evidence?
Haig, D. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142741 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Haig, D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-32
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123982853
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Kinship Theory of Genomic Imprinting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.9
- The paper
- Haig, D. (2000). The Kinship Theory of Genomic Imprinting. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
