The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESTRICTION AND MODIFICATION SYSTEMS
Abstract
Orthologs and paralogs are two fundamentally different types of homologous genes that evolved, respectively, by vertical descent from a single ancestral gene and by duplication. Orthology and paralogy are key concepts of evolutionary genomics. A ...Read More
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The RM system, an important immune system for bacteria that prevents the uptake of exogenous DNA, is largely variable in terms of copy number and constitution.45 , 46”
From Whole genomic DNA sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of Arthrospira platensis: high genome plasticity and genetic diversity (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
DNA Restriction Enzyme from E. coli
Meselson, M. S., & Yuan, R. T. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2171110a0 · Cited by 819
Group I introns as mobile genetic elements: Facts and mechanistic speculations — a review
Dujon, B. (1989) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(89)90034-6 · Cited by 478
Restriction Endonucleases in the Analysis and Restructuring of DNA Molecules
Nathans, D., & Smith, H. O. (1975) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.001421 · Cited by 467
Substrate and sequence specificity of a eukaryotic DNA methylase
Gruenbaum, Y., Cedar, H., & Razin, A. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/295620a0 · Cited by 436
DNA Nucleotide Sequence Restricted by the RI Endonuclease
Hedgpeth, J., Goodman, H. M., & Boyer, H. W. (1972) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.69.11.3448 · Cited by 363
McrA and McrB restriction phenotypes of someE.colistrains and implications for gene cloning
Raleigh, E. A., Murray, N. E., Revel, H. R. B., Blumenthal, R., Westaway, D. A., Reith, A. D., Rigby, P. W. J., Elhai, J., & Hanahan, D. (1988) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/16.4.1563 · Cited by 342
Self-citationDNA Restriction and Modification Mechanisms in Bacteria
Boyer, H. W. (1971) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.001101 · Cited by 330
Restriction and Modification of DNA
Meselson, M. S., Yuan, R., & Heywood, J. (1972) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.002311 · Cited by 290
The construction in vitro of transducing derivatives of phage lambda
Borck, J. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 259
The great GATC: DNA methylation in E. coli
Barras, F., & Marinus, M. G. (1989) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(89)90054-1 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 713
Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from raw milk sources in Victoria, Australia
McMillan, K. E., Moore, S. C., McAuley, C. M., Fegan, N., & Fox, E. M. (2016) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0789-1 · Cited by 87
“aureus infection and an ever increasing demand for raw milk sales overseas [22].”
BackgroundAntagonistic Coevolution of Marine Planktonic Viruses and Their Hosts
Martiny, J. B. H., Riemann, L., Marston, M. F., & Middelboe, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135108 · Cited by 91
“One of the best known of these mechanisms is the restriction-modification system, where bacteria have developed endonucleases that inactivate the invading viral DNA by cutting it at specific sites while protecting their own DNA through methylation (Wilson & Murray 1991, Labrie et al. 2010).”
BackgroundS-Adenosyl-L-methionine–Dependent Restriction Enzymes
Sistla, S., & Rao, D. N. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230490440532 · Cited by 85
“Cytosine methylation can take place at the C5 position or at the N4 amino group, whereas adenine methylation occurs at the N6 amino group (Wilson & Murray, 1991).”
BackgroundMethodCircular Permutations in the Molecular Evolution of DNA Methyltransferases
Jeltsch, A. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006529 · Cited by 84
“In type IIS restriction/modification systems these tandem enzymes are evolutionary stable, because it is genetically favorable if the genes of restriction/modification systems are linked (Wilson 1991; Wilson and Murray 1991).”
BackgroundHiggins, L. S. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.12.2492 · Cited by 84
“Type II and Type IIs restriction enzymes cleave DNA at a specific position, and therefore are useful in genetic engineering and molecular cloning (2).”
BackgroundDryden, D. T. F., Cooper, L. P., & Murray, N. E. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)38641-7 · Cited by 84
Self-citationMiyaue, S., Suzuki, É., Komiyama, Y., Kondo, Y., Morikawa, M., & Maeda, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01396 · Cited by 89
“An early example is the restriction modification system (Luria, 1953; Wilson, 1991), and more recently, the CRISPR–Cas9 system (Jansen et al., 2002; Horvath and Barrangou, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodBeyond Restriction Modification: Epigenomic Roles of DNA Methylation in Prokaryotes
Anton, B. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-040521-035040 · Cited by 80
Analysis of 74 kb of DNA Located at the Right End of the 330-kb Chlorella Virus PBCV-1 Genome
Li, Y., Lu, Z., Sun, L., Ropp, S. L., Kutish, G. F., Rock, D. L., & Etten, J. L. V. (1997) · Virology · doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8805 · Cited by 82
Restriction Endonucleases: Classification, Properties, and Applications
Williams, R. J. (2003) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:23:3:225 · Cited by 81
Genome Sequencing Reveals a Phage in Helicobacter pylori
Lehours, P., Vale, F. F., Bjursell, M. K., Melefors, Ö., Advani, R., Glavas, S., Guéguéniat, J., Gontier, É., Lacomme, S., Matos, A., et al. (2011) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00239-11 · Cited by 83
PHAGE-MEDIATED SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION AND MAINTENANCE OF RESTRICTION-MODIFICATION
Korona, R., & Levin, B. R. (1993) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02113.x · Cited by 81
“In the earlier study with E. coli K-12 and B, Levin (1988) used naturally regulated type I R-M systems (see Wilson and Murray, 1991) and only one species ofphage, Lamb da.”
MethodBacterial DNA Methylation and Methylomes
Casadesús, J. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43624-1_3 · Cited by 80
Oxidation of phosphorothioate DNA modifications leads to lethal genomic instability
Kellner, S. M., DeMott, M. S., Cheng, C. P., Russell, B. S., Cao, B., You, D., & Dedon, P. C. (2017) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2407 · Cited by 79
CRISPR-Induced Distributed Immunity in Microbial Populations
Childs, L. M., England, W., Young, M., Weitz, J. S., & Whitaker, R. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101710 · Cited by 79
“Bacteria and archaea resist infection through random mutation resulting in loss or modification of viral receptors, or through targeted defense systems such as physical blocking, restriction-modification systems, and abortive infection systems [4–10].”
BackgroundA mutational analysis of the two motifs common to adenine methyltransferases.
Willcock, D. F., Dryden, D. T. F., & Murray, N. E. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06701.x · Cited by 78
Self-citationSzczelkun, M. D., Dillingham, M. S., Janščák, P., Firman, K., & Halford, S. E. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb01023.x · Cited by 77
Aa, B., Delver, E. P., & Rodzevich, O. V. (1993) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.175.15.4843-4850.1993 · Cited by 76
“However, gene transfer may be limited by the host-encoded restriction endonucleases that recognize the methylation pattern of guest DNA (1, 8, 9, 43).”
BackgroundEstibariz, I., Overmann, A., Ailloud, F., Krebes, J., Josenhans, C., & Suerbaum, S. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1307 · Cited by 69
“Three types of DNA methylation occur in bacteria, N6-methyladenine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C) and N4-methylcytosine (m4C) (1,2).”
BackgroundLi, W., Ning, G.-X., Mao, J., Guo, Z., Zhou, Q. X., & Chen, B. (2019) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03266-4 · Cited by 74
Bacteriophages as Biotechnological Tools
Elois, M. A., da Silva, R., Pilati, G. V. T., Rodrı́guez-Làzaro, D., & Fongaro, G. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15020349 · Cited by 74
“Some phages encode anti-restriction systems, which are systems to allow evasion of the restriction immunity, alteration, and occlusion of the restriction site are examples of how these mechanisms can act [59,62].”
Bacteria vs. Bacteriophages: Parallel Evolution of Immune Arsenals
Shabbir, M. A. B., Hao, H., Shabbir, M. Z., Wu, Q., Sattar, A., & Yuan, Z. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01292 · Cited by 74
Bacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria.
Forde, A., & Fitzgerald, G. F. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 74
Molecular Evidence for the Thriving of Campylobacter jejuni ST-4526 in Japan
Asakura, H., Brüggemann, H., Sheppard, S. K., Ekawa, T., Meyer, T. F., Yamamoto, S., & Igimi, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048394 · Cited by 73
“In addition, many variations were observed in the restriction-modification (R-M) system genes (Cj0690c, 39 SNPs, Cj0031, and 17 SNPs) (Table 3, Table S7), which are also involved in a barrier against foreign DNA and bacteriophages [46], [47].”
BackgroundThe Role of Prophage in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria
Varani, A. M., Monteiro-Vitorello, C. B., Nakaya, H. I., & Sluys, M. V. (2013) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173010 · Cited by 73
Selfishness and death: raison d'être of restriction, recombination and mitochondria
Kobayashi, I. (1998) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01532-7 · Cited by 72
Gfeller, K. Y. (2003) · Plasmid · doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2003.08.001 · Cited by 72
Molecular genetics of bacteriophage and natural phage defence systems in the genus Lactococcus
Garvey, P., van Sinderen, D., Twomey, D. P., Hill, C., & Fitzgerald, G. F. (1995) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/0958-6946(95)00038-0 · Cited by 72
Distribution of the ardA family of antirestriction genes on conjugative plasmids
Chilley, P. M., & Wilkins, B. M. (1995) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-141-9-2157 · Cited by 77
Émond, É., Lavallée, R., Drolet, G., Moineau, S., & LaPointe, G. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.4.1700-1709.2001 · Cited by 71
“The last gene of this transcription unit encodes HsdS, the specificity subunit of a type I restriction/modification (R/M) system (58).”
BackgroundMoineau, S., Walker, S. A., Vedamuthu, E. R., & Vandenbergh, P. A. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.6.2193-2202.1995 · Cited by 71
“This type of similarity is unusual among type II endonucleases that catalyze identical reactions (63).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAhlgren, N. A., Chen, Y., Needham, D. M., Parada, A. E., Sachdeva, R., Trinh, V., Chen, T., & Fuhrman, J. A. (2017) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13768 · Cited by 68
Catalytic and DNA Binding Properties of PvuII Restriction Endonuclease Mutants
Nastri, H. G., Evans, P. D., Walker, I. H., & Riggs, P. D. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.41.25761 · Cited by 70
Chemistry and Biology of DNA Methyltransferases
Ahmad, I., & Rao, D. N. (1996) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239609108722 · Cited by 70
The interaction of phages and bacteria: the co-evolutionary arms race
Safari, F., Sharifi, M., Farajnia, S., Akbari, B., Ahmadi, M. K. B., Negahdaripour, M., & Ghasemi, Y. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2019.1674774 · Cited by 69
“phage resistant to the R/M system of all hosts [157].”
BackgroundWaugh, D. S., & Sauer, R. T. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.20.9596 · Cited by 69
Wang, H., Sivonen, K., Rouhiainen, L., Fewer, D. P., Lyra, C., Ylinen, A., Vestola, J., Jokela, J., Rantasärkkä, K., Li, Z., et al. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-613 · Cited by 68
“An RM system usually contains a restriction endonuclease that recognizes a specific sequence for cleavage and a DNA methyltransferase that modifies the same sequence and protects it from cleavage [59].”
BackgroundVijesurier, R. M., Carlock, L. R., Blumenthal, R., & Dunbar, J. C. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.2.477-487.2000 · Cited by 68
“The bacterial type II restriction-modification systems include a DNA modification methyltransferase (MTase) and a restriction endonuclease (REase), both of which act independently on the same DNA sequence (65).”
BackgroundBujnicki, J. M. (2001) · Acta Biochimica Polonica · doi:10.18388/abp.2001_3859 · Cited by 74
“This guarantees that after DNA replication hemimethylated daughter duplexes eventually become fully re-methylated rather than being cleaved [1].”
BackgroundLactococcal Plasmid pNP40 Encodes a Novel, Temperature-Sensitive Restriction-Modification System
O’Driscoll, J., Glynn, F., Cahalane, O., Motherway, M. O., Fitzgerald, G. F., & van Sinderen, D. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.9.5546-5556.2004 · Cited by 66
“Restriction enzymes of the type II group (unlike type I and type III representatives) do not normally exhibit sequence similarity (3, 67, 68).”
BackgroundPhage–host population dynamics promotes prophage acquisition in bacteria with innate immunity
Pleška, M., Lang, M., Refardt, D., Levin, B. R., & Guet, C. C. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0424-z · Cited by 66
Venclovas, Č., Timinskas, A., & Šikšnys, V. (1994) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340200308 · Cited by 66
A Bioinspired Synthetic Approach for Building Metal−Organic Frameworks with Accessible Metal Centers
Barron, P. M., Wray, C. A., Hu, C. T., Guo, Z., & Choe, W. (2010) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic101459j · Cited by 65
DNA-[Adenine] Methylation in Lower Eukaryotes
Hattman, S. (2005) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1007/s10541-005-0148-6 · Cited by 65
Sharp, P. M., Kelleher, J. E., Daniel, A. S., Cowan, G. M., & Murray, N. E. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.20.9836 · Cited by 65
Self-citationDiversity within the Campylobacter jejuni type I restriction–modification loci
Miller, W. G., Pearson, B. M., Wells, J. M., Parker, C. T., Kapitonov, V. V., & Mandrell, R. E. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27327-0 · Cited by 62
“M systems, see Bickle & Kruger, 1993; Murray, 2000; Redaschi & Bickle, 1996; Wilson & Murray, 1992).”
Gowher, H., & Jeltsch, A. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4127 · Cited by 64
DNA restriction is a barrier to natural transformation in Pseudomonas stutzeri JM300
Berndt, C., Meier, P., & Wackernagel, W. (2003) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26033-0 · Cited by 63
“However, as pointed out by Wilson & Murray (1991), in vitro assays for restriction enzymes have limitations, and bacteria scored as negative can in fact be positive.”
BackgroundAnjum, A., Brathwaite, K. J., Aidley, J., Connerton, P. L., CUMMINGS, N. J., Parkhill, J., Connerton, I. F., & Bayliss, C. D. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw019 · Cited by 62
Anton, B. P., Heiter, D. F., Benner, J. S., Hess, E. J., Greenough, L., Moran, L. S., Slatko, B. E., & Brooks, J. E. (1997) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00638-5 · Cited by 62
Reactions of Type II Restriction Endonucleases with 8-Base Pair Recognition Sites
Bilcock, D. T., Daniels, L. E., Bath, A. J., & Halford, S. E. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.51.36379 · Cited by 61
Humbert, O., Dorer, M. S., & Salama, N. R. (2010) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07456.x · Cited by 58
“Double-stranded DNA taken up by natural competence is likely converted to single-stranded DNA, possibly during transit (Stingl et al., 2010), but single-stranded DNA is generally a poor substrate for REases (Wilson and Murray, 1991).”
BackgroundUmenhoffer, K., Draskovits, G., Nyerges, Á., Karcagi, I., Bogos, B., Tímár, E., Csörgő, B., Herczeg, R., Nagy, I., Fehér, T., et al. (2017) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00378 · Cited by 58
Bacteriophage Defense Systems and Strategies for Lactic Acid Bacteria
Sturino, J. M., & Klaenhammer, T. R. (2004) · Advances in applied microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(04)56011-2 · Cited by 59
Characterization of BcgI, a new kind of restriction-modification system.
Kong, H., Roemer, S., Waite-Rees, P. A., Benner, J. S., Wilson, G. G., & Nwankwo, D. O. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42403-3 · Cited by 59
Self-citationBadri, H., Monsieurs, P., Coninx, I., Wattiez, R., & Leys, N. (2015) · MicrobiologyOpen · doi:10.1002/mbo3.229 · Cited by 56
The Enigmatic Genome of an Obligate Ancient Spiroplasma Symbiont in a Hadal Holothurian
He, L., Zhang, P.-W., Huang, J., Zhu, F.-C., Danchin, A., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01965-17 · Cited by 58
“Bacteria depend on the RMs to prevent invasion of plasmids and phages (41).”
BackgroundMcClelland, S. E., Dryden, D. T. F., & Szczelkun, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.018 · Cited by 58
Analysis of the subunit assembly of the typeIC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I
Janščák, P. (1998) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/26.19.4439 · Cited by 58
Tao, T., & Blumenthal, R. (1992) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.174.10.3395-3398.1992 · Cited by 58
“Genes similar topvuIIC appear to be widespread (20, 24).”
BackgroundNEBcutter—A Program to Cleave DNA with Restriction Enzymes
Pósfai, J., Roberts, R. J., & Vincze, T. (2004) · Informa Healthcare eBooks · doi:10.3109/9780203997352.179 · Cited by 58
DNA restriction-modification systems in the ethanologen, Zymomonas mobilis ZM4
Kerr, A. L., Jeon, Y. J., Svenson, C. J., Rogers, P. L., & Neilan, B. A. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2936-1 · Cited by 57
“As mentioned earlier, in the absence of the R subunit, the M and S subunits may form an ATP-independent . methyltransferase ( Wilson and Murray 1991 ).”
BackgroundMeister, J., MacWilliams, M. P., Hübner, P., Jütte, H., Skrzypek, E., Piekarowicz, A., & Bickle, T. A. (1993) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06147.x · Cited by 57
Evolutionary Relationship between Different Subgroups of Restriction Endonucleases
Pingoud, V., Kubareva, E. A., Stengel, G., Friedhoff, P., Bujnicki, J. M., Urbanke, C., Sudina, A., & Pingoud, A. M. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111625200 · Cited by 57
Methylation of slipped duplexes, snapbacks and cruciforms by human DNA(cytosine-5)methyltransferase
Laayoun, A., & Smith, S. S. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.9.1584 · Cited by 57
Schäfer, A. H., Schwarzer, A., Kalinowski, J., & Pühler, A. (1994) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.176.23.7309-7319.1994 · Cited by 56
Webb, J. L., King, G., Ternent, D., Titheradge, A. J. B., & Murray, N. E. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00551.x · Cited by 56
Self-citationClaus, H., Friedrich, A. W., Frosch, M., & Vogel, U. F. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.5.1296-1303.2000 · Cited by 55
“The simplest bacterial R-M systems are type II R-M systems, which comprise distinct DNA restriction and modification enzymes and which require no cofactors other than magnesium ions (4, 58).”
BackgroundEvidence for an evolutionary relationship among type-II restriction endonucleases
Jeltsch, A., Kröger, M., & Pingoud, A. M. (1995) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00181-5 · Cited by 54
Molecular evolution of DNA-(cytosine-N4) methyItransferases: evidence for their polyphyletic origin
Bujnicki, J. M., & Radlińska, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.22.4501 · Cited by 52
The Battle between Bacteria and Bacteriophages: A Conundrum to Their Immune System
Teklemariam, A. D., Al-Hindi, R. R., Qadri, I., Alharbi, M. G., Ramadan, W. S., Ayubu, J., Al-Hejin, A. M., Hakim, R. F., Hakim, F. F., Hakim, R. F., et al. (2023) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12020381 · Cited by 52
Kim, M. S., Kim, Y. D., Hong, S. S., Park, K., Ko, K. S., & Myung, H. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02606-14 · Cited by 52
“The latter may involve restriction modification or the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) system (10, 12, 13).”
BackgroundJanulaitis, A., Vaisvila, R., Timinskas, A., Klimašauskas, S., & Butkus, V. (1992) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/20.22.6051 · Cited by 52
Gupta, A., Kumar, P. H., Dineshkumar, T. K., Varshney, U., & Subramanya, H. S. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4935 · Cited by 52
Krüger, D. H., Kupper, D., Meisel, A., Reuter, M., & Schroeder, C. (1995) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00200.x · Cited by 52
Tan, X. S., Sewell, C., & Lindahl, P. A. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja016676r · Cited by 52
Morgan, R., Xiao, J.-P., & Xu, S.-Y. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.10.3669-3673.1998 · Cited by 52
“Among the cloned restriction endonucleases, some enzymes with the same or related DNA recognition sequences have similar amino acid sequences (30 to 100% identity) (30).”
BackgroundMcGeehan, J. E., Streeter, S. D., Papapanagiotou, I., Fox, G. C., & Kneale, G. G. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.025 · Cited by 51
“Non-specific DNA binding has been shown to modulate the Lac system regulation by affecting ( 1 ) the thermodynamic equilibrium by the reduction of free protein in solution, (2) the kinetics of the system by increasing operator target location from diffusion alone (e.g.”
BackgroundTranscriptome Analysis of Adaptive Heat Shock Response of Streptococcus thermophilus
Li, J., Bi, Y.-T., Dong, C., Yang, J., & Liang, W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025777 · Cited by 51
“The general function of the restriction-modification system implicates in cellular defense and represents a barrier against foreign DNA through destroying them [25].”
BackgroundRestriction enzymes and their use in molecular biology: An overview
Felice, F. D., Micheli, G., & Camilloni, G. (2019) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-019-9856-8 · Cited by 50
Kong, Y., Ma, J. H., Warren, K., Tsang, R. S. W., Low, D. E., Jamieson, F., Alexander, D. C., & Hao, W. (2013) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evt116 · Cited by 49
“The restriction and modification system (RMS) in bacteria generally consists of a sequence-specific restriction enzyme (restriction endonuclease) and a modification enzyme (methyltransferase) encoded by adjacent genes on the chromosome (Wilson and Murray 1991).”
BackgroundCao, B., Cheng, Q., Gu, C., Yao, F., DeMott, M. S., Zheng, X., Deng, Z., Dedon, P. C., & You, D. (2014) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.12692 · Cited by 49
“M systems are based on DNA nucleobase modifications until the recent discovery of the PT-dependent restriction system in bacteria (Xu et al., 2010).”
BackgroundRestriction enzymes in cells, not eppendorfs
King, G., & Murray, N. E. (1994) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0966-842x(94)90649-1 · Cited by 49
Self-citationRimšelienė, R., Vaisvila, R., & Janulaitis, A. (1995) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(94)00794-s · Cited by 49
The domains of a type I DNA methyltransferase
Cooper, L. P., & Dryden, D. T. F. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(94)90008-6 · Cited by 49
The Type IIB restriction endonucleases
Marshall, J. J. T., & Halford, S. E. (2010) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0890410 · Cited by 48
Translocation and specific cleavage of bacteriophage T7 DNA in vivo by Eco KI
García, L. R., & Molineux, I. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.22.12430 · Cited by 48
Gunther, E. J., Murray, N. E., & Glazer, P. M. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.16.3903 · Cited by 48
Self-citationGenome-wide analysis of restriction-modification system in unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria
Zhao, F., Zhang, X., Liang, C., Wu, J., Bao, Q., & Qin, S. (2006) · Physiological Genomics · doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00255.2005 · Cited by 47
“In Type I RM system, HsdR, HsdM, and HsdS form a complex (R2M2S1) to perform both endonuclease and MTase activities (4, 34, 55).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA game of resistance: War between bacteria and phages and how phage cocktails can be the solution
Costa, P., Pereira, C., Romalde, J. L., & Almeida, A. (2024) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2024.110209 · Cited by 49
Read, T. D., Thomas, A. T., & Wilkins, B. M. (1992) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01366.x · Cited by 47
Kita, K., Tsuda, J., Kato, T., Okamoto, K., Yanase, H., & Tanaka, M. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.21.6822-6827.1999 · Cited by 47
“A molecular mass of 11,455 Da is in good agreement with the predicted sizes of other C proteins, which associate with several type II R-M systems and regulate the expression of R-M genes (1, 37).”
BackgroundGenetic Dissection of the Francisella novicida Restriction Barrier
Gallagher, L. A., McKevitt, M. T., Ramage, E. R., & Manoil, C. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01188-08 · Cited by 46
“Incoming DNA is cleaved (restricted) if it has not been modified by methylation at specific sequences (24, 35).”
BackgroundAdaptative Potential of the Lactococcus Lactis IL594 Strain Encoded in Its 7 Plasmids
Górecki, R. K., Koryszewska-Bagińska, A., Gołębiewski, M., Żylińska, J., Grynberg, M., & Bardowski, J. K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022238 · Cited by 47
“The last gene of this transcription unit encodes HsdS, the specifity subunit of a type I restriction modification system [45].”
Population and genomic analysis of the genus Halorubrum
Fullmer, M. S., Soucy, S. M., Swithers, K. S., Makkay, A. M., Wheeler, R., Ventosa, A., Gogarten, J. P., & Papke, R. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00140 · Cited by 46
“This record serves the organism by recognizing and destroying sequences that resemble previously encountered MGEs.”
BackgroundInfluentialDNA Base Flipping: A General Mechanism for Writing, Reading, and Erasing DNA Modifications
Hong, S., & Cheng, X. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43624-1_14 · Cited by 46
“…Flipping in the Recognition of Modified Bases 4.1 Eukaryotic SRA Domains The function of 5mC and N6mA in prokaryotes was classically understood in the context of restriction-modification systems, in which methylated bacterial DNA is protected from restriction digestion (Wilson and Murray 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialComparative Genomics of the Listeria monocytogenes ST204 Subgroup
Fox, E. M., Allnutt, T. R., Bradbury, M. I., Fanning, S., & Chandry, P. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02057 · Cited by 46
“These systems can target foreign invading DNA with restriction endonucleases, and associated methyltransferases protect host DNA from restriction (Wilson and Murray, 1991; Murphy et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAn Asymmetric Complex of Restriction Endonuclease MspI on Its Palindromic DNA Recognition Site
Xu, Q., Kucera, R. B., Roberts, R. J., & Guo, H. (2004) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.07.014 · Cited by 46
“MspI displays no significant sequence homology to other REases, withfrom invading foreign DNA (Wilson and Murray, 1991; Bickle and Kruger, 1993).”
BackgroundDNA Cleavage by the Type IC Restriction-Modification EnzymeEcoR124II
Dreier, J., MacWilliams, M. P., & Bickle, T. A. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0672 · Cited by 46
“The cofactors required for these reactions are S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) for methylation, and Mg2+, AdoMet and ATP for restriction (reviewed by Bickle, 1993; Bickle & Kru ¨ ger, 1993; Wilson & Murray, 1991 ).”
BackgroundBarany, F., Danzitz, M. J., Zebala, J. A., & Mayer, A. N. (1992) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(92)90296-2 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. G., & Murray, N. E.
- Affiliations
- New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 585-627
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2179631201
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- restriction-modification systems, restriction enzymes, DNA methylation, DNA methyltransferases, bacterial defense against foreign DNA, gene duplication, homologous genes, orthology, paralogy
- MeSH terms
- Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Viral, Genes, Bacterial, Methylation, Terminology as Topic, Substrate Specificity, DNA Restriction-Modification Enzymes, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review