The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESTRICTION AND MODIFICATION SYSTEMS
Abstract
Orthologs and paralogs are two fundamentally different types of homologous genes that evolved, respectively, by vertical descent from a single ancestral gene and by duplication. Orthology and paralogy are key concepts of evolutionary genomics. A ...Read More
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The RM system, an important immune system for bacteria that prevents the uptake of exogenous DNA, is largely variable in terms of copy number and constitution.45 , 46”
From Whole genomic DNA sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of Arthrospira platensis: high genome plasticity and genetic diversity (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
DNA Restriction Enzyme from E. coli
Meselson, M. S., & Yuan, R. T. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2171110a0 · Cited by 819
Group I introns as mobile genetic elements: Facts and mechanistic speculations — a review
Dujon, B. (1989) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(89)90034-6 · Cited by 478
Restriction Endonucleases in the Analysis and Restructuring of DNA Molecules
Nathans, D., & Smith, H. O. (1975) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.001421 · Cited by 467
Substrate and sequence specificity of a eukaryotic DNA methylase
Gruenbaum, Y., Cedar, H., & Razin, A. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/295620a0 · Cited by 436
DNA Nucleotide Sequence Restricted by the RI Endonuclease
Hedgpeth, J., Goodman, H. M., & Boyer, H. W. (1972) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.69.11.3448 · Cited by 363
McrA and McrB restriction phenotypes of someE.colistrains and implications for gene cloning
Raleigh, E. A., Murray, N. E., Revel, H. R. B., Blumenthal, R., Westaway, D. A., Reith, A. D., Rigby, P. W. J., Elhai, J., & Hanahan, D. (1988) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/16.4.1563 · Cited by 342
Self-citationDNA Restriction and Modification Mechanisms in Bacteria
Boyer, H. W. (1971) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.001101 · Cited by 330
Restriction and Modification of DNA
Meselson, M. S., Yuan, R., & Heywood, J. (1972) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.002311 · Cited by 290
The construction in vitro of transducing derivatives of phage lambda
Borck, J. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 259
The great GATC: DNA methylation in E. coli
Barras, F., & Marinus, M. G. (1989) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(89)90054-1 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms
Labrie, S. J., Samson, J. E., & Moineau, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2315 · Cited by 2,405
“The antiviral efficiency of an R–M system is directly proportional to the number of recognition sites in a viral double-stranded-DNA genom”
BackgroundGenomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators.
Klose, R. J., & Bird, A. P. (2006) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008 · Cited by 2,501
Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
“Yet these barriers, which change at a very rapid pace, are not correlated with the degree of overall sequence divergence (Wilson and Murray 1991); and they do not preclude DNA transfer but only limit the size of transferred fragments (McKane and Milkman 1995).”
BackgroundIntermittent search strategies
Bénichou, O., Loverdo, C., Moreau, M., & Voituriez, R. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.81 · Cited by 754
“…of the kinetics of such search processes between reaction partners can be illustrated by the bacterial restriction and modification system (Wilson and Murray, 1991), which involves couples of methyltransferase and restriction enzymes that recognize the same sequence on DNA (for example…”
BackgroundRevenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences
Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3096 · Cited by 727
Bickle, T. A., & Krüger, D. H. (1993) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.57.2.434-450.1993 · Cited by 647
Structure and function of type II restriction endonucleases
Pingoud, A. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.18.3705 · Cited by 641
“With a few obvious exceptions of closely related isoschizomers, like EcoRI and RsrI (recognizing G↓AATTC), MthT1, FnuDI and NgoPII (recognizing GG↓CC), XmaI and Cfr9I (recognizing CCC↓GGG), BanI and HgiCI (recognizing G↓GYRCC), TaqI/TtHB8I (recognizing T↓CGA), BsoBI and AvaII (recognizing C↓YCRG), to name a few that s…”
BackgroundNEBcutter: a program to cleave DNA with restriction enzymes
Vincze, T. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg526 · Cited by 640
Diverse Functions of Restriction-Modification Systems in Addition to Cellular Defense
Vasu, K., & Nagaraja, V. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00044-12 · Cited by 639
“, hydroxymethylation (53), glycosylation (55), and acetamidation (56, 57).”
BackgroundA New Family of β-Hairpin Mimetics Based on a Trypsin Inhibitor from Sunflower Seeds
Descours, A., Moehle, K., Renard, A., & Robinson, J. A. (2002) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/1439-7633(20020402)3:4 · Cited by 68
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2010) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 517
DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental requirements and function
Bogdanović, O., & Veenstra, G. J. C. (2009) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-009-0221-9 · Cited by 503
“DNA methylation in higher eukaryotes is usually associated with a repressed chromatin environment, while in the prokaryote kingdom both cytosine and adenine methylation have been described as a part of the host restriction system (Wilson and Murray 1991).”
BackgroundTHE ROLE OF DNA METHYLATION IN CANCER GENETICS AND EPIGENETICS
Laird, P. W., & Jaenisch, R. (1996) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.441 · Cited by 478
Type I Restriction Systems: Sophisticated Molecular Machines (a Legacy of Bertani and Weigle)
Murray, N. E. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.2.412-434.2000 · Cited by 447
“1, and the reviews selected (5, 10, 18, 65, 83, 92, 118, 144, 149, 170, 192) include some of particular historical significance.”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhen Less Is More: Gene Loss as an Engine of Evolutionary Change
Olson, M. V. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302219 · Cited by 437
“Among the large number of sequenced restriction-endonuclease genes, there are almost never recognizable sequence motifs, even when the encoded enzymes have nearly identical properties (Wilson and Murray 1991; Bickle and Kruger 1993).”
BackgroundComparative genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria
Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt157 · Cited by 446
The DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases
Kumar, S., Cheng, X., Klimašauskas, S., Mi, S., Pósfai, J., Roberts, R. J., & Wilson, G. G. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.1.1 · Cited by 429
Self-citationMcClelland, M., Nelson, M. B., & Raschke, E. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.17.3640 · Cited by 424
Crystal structure of the Hhal DNA methyltransferase complexed with S-adenosyl-l-methionine
Cheng, X., Kumar, S., Pósfai, J., Pflugrath, J. W., & Roberts, R. J. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90421-l · Cited by 365
Recognition and Cleavage of DNA by Type‐II Restriction Endonucleases
Pingoud, A. M., & Jeltsch, A. (1997) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-6-00001.x · Cited by 330
MicroRNA in the immune system, microRNA as an immune system
Lu, L., & Liston, A. (2009) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03092.x · Cited by 300
Ortega-Galisteo, A. P., Morales‐Ruíz, T., Ariza, R. R., & Roldán‐Arjona, T. (2008) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9346-0 · Cited by 306
“In prokaryotes, DNA methylation occurs on both cytosine and adenine bases and encompasses part of the host restriction system (Wilson and Murray 1991), causing transcriptional activation or repression (Casadesus and Low 2006).”
BackgroundComplete Genome Analysis of the Mandarin Fish Infectious Spleen and Kidney Necrosis Iridovirus
He, J. G., Deng, M., Weng, S. P., Li, Z., Zhou, S. Y., Qin, L., Wang, X. Z., & Chan, S.-M. (2001) · Virology · doi:10.1006/viro.2001.1208 · Cited by 292
CRISPR-Cas and restriction–modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance
Dupuis, M.-È., Villion, M., Magadán, A. H., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3087 · Cited by 295
Type II restriction endonucleases—a historical perspective and more
Pingoud, A. M., Wilson, G. G., & Wende, W. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku447 · Cited by 274
Self-citationNon-CG Methylation in the Human Genome
He, Y., & Ecker, J. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025437 · Cited by 280
“This mechanism is present in a variety of organisms, including numerous mammals, plants, fungi, insects, protists, archaebacteria, and eubacteria (19, 24, 25, 48, 55, 56, 59, 72, 81, 91, 102, 108, 110).”
Murphy, J., Mahony, J., Ainsworth, S., Nauta, A., & van Sinderen, D. (2013) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02229-13 · Cited by 258
Major bacterial lineages are essentially devoid of CRISPR-Cas viral defence systems
Burstein, D. E., Sun, C. L., Brown, C. T., Sharon, I., Anantharaman, K., Probst, A. J., Thomas, B. C., & Banfield, J. F. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10613 · Cited by 247
Evolutionary Ecology of Prokaryotic Immune Mechanisms
van Houte, S., Buckling, A., & Westra, E. R. (2016) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00011-16 · Cited by 260
Clouaire, T., & Stancheva, I. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-7324-y · Cited by 250
“In prokaryotes, methylation occurs both on adenine and cytosine nucleotides and is involved in regulation of DNA replication timing, DNA repair and defence against invasion by foreign DNA [1].”
BackgroundEtten, J. L. V., & Meints, R. H. (1999) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.447 · Cited by 227
Yeast Nop2 and Rcm1 methylate C2870 and C2278 of the 25S rRNA, respectively
Sharma, S., Yang, J., Watzinger, P., Kötter, P., & Entian, K. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt679 · Cited by 219
“Bisulphite sequencing has been useful for the analysis of m5C residues in DNA and smaller RNA molecules, but for larger RNAs like rRNA, the method lacks reproducibility and need further improvements.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe hidden life of integrative and conjugative elements
Delavat, F., Miyazaki, R., Carraro, N., Pradervand, N., & van der Meer, J. R. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux008 · Cited by 221
“ICE-DNA may also be considered as foreign DNA by the host, in analogy to phage DNA, and become subject to restriction digestion (Wilson and Murray 1991) or CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage (Lopez-Sanchez et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2013) (Fig.”
Backgroundden Bakker, H. C., Cummings, C. A., Ferreira, V. B., Vatta, P., Orsi, R. H., Degoricija, L., Barker, M., Petrauskene, O., Furtado, M. R., & Wiedmann, M. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-688 · Cited by 207
“Bacterial defense systems against mobile elements/foreign DNA implicated in the reduction of horizontal gene transfer include (i) restriction-modification (R-M) systems [50] and (ii) clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) systems [51].”
BackgroundStructure of PvuII endonuclease with cognate DNA.
Cheng, X., Balendiran, K., Schildkraut, I., & Anderson, J. E. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06708.x · Cited by 205
Henikoff, S., & Comai, L. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.1.307 · Cited by 204
Lau, R., Ye, Q., Birkholz, E. A., Berg, K. R., Patel, L., Mathews, I. T., Watrous, J. D., Ego, K. M., Whiteley, A. T., Lowey, B., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.010 · Cited by 199
Genetic Tools for the Industrially Promising Methanotroph Methylomicrobium buryatense
Puri, A. W., Owen, S., Chu, F., Chavkin, T., Beck, D. A. C., Kalyuzhnaya, M., & Lidstrom, M. E. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03795-14 · Cited by 196
“The genome sequence also contains multiple annotated restriction/modification (R/M) systems (24) that may explain the low mating frequencies.”
BackgroundPhycodnaviridae– large DNA algal viruses
Etten, J. L. V., Graves, M. V., Müller, D. G., Boland, W., & Delaroque, N. (2002) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/s00705-002-0822-6 · Cited by 201
“iii) Like bacterial type II R-M genes [187], the chlorella virus R-M genes are located near one another, although the spacing and relative orientation of the two genes can vary.”
Unusual Life Style of Giant Chlorella Viruses
Etten, J. L. V. (2003) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143915 · Cited by 187
“(c) Like bacterial type II R-M genes (222), the chlorella virus R-M genes are located near one another, although the spacing and relative orientation of the two genes can vary.”
BackgroundGong, W. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.14.2702 · Cited by 176
Comparative genomics of the restriction-modification systems in Helicobacter pylori
Lin, L.-F., Pósfai, J., Roberts, R. J., & Kong, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.051612298 · Cited by 170
Rapid evolutionary turnover of mobile genetic elements drives bacterial resistance to phages
Hussain, F. A., Dubert, J., Elsherbini, J., Murphy, M., VanInsberghe, D., Arevalo, P., Kauffman, K. M., Rodiño‐Janeiro, B. K., Gavin, H. E., Gomez, A. L., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb1083 · Cited by 176
Kinder, S. A., Badger, J. L., Bryant, G. O., Pepe, J. C., & Miller, V. L. (1993) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90478-l · Cited by 171
Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes
Dryden, D. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.18.3728 · Cited by 163
“In addition, the target sequences of type I or III R-M systems offer more scope for the evolution of new sequence specificities than the simple rotationally symmetrical, non-interrupted sequence recognised by most type II R-M systems (1).”
BackgroundImmigration control of DNA in bacteria: self versus non-self
Murray, N. E. (2002) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-148-1-3 · Cited by 162
“Third, a specificity subunit that comprises two TRDs, each recognizing a different target sequence, offers more scope for diversification than a classical type II restriction endonuclease which, as a dimer of identical subunits, recognizes a symmetrical target sequence (Wilson & Murray, 1991).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDNA phosphorothioation is widespread and quantized in bacterial genomes
Wang, L., Chen, S., Vergin, K. L., Giovannoni, S. J., Chan, S. W., DeMott, M. S., Taghizadeh, K., Cordero, O. X., Cutler, M., Timberlake, S. C., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017261108 · Cited by 165
“There are two explanations for the low PT levels: a function for PT other than restriction-modification, as is the case for DNA methylation in many prokaryotes (9, 12); and biochemical nonspecificity for the Dnd protein responsible for target selection.”
BackgroundHorizontal DNA Transfer Mechanisms of Bacteria as Weapons of Intragenomic Conflict
Croucher, N. J., Mostowy, R. J., Wymant, C., Turner, P., Bentley, S. D., & Fraser, C. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002394 · Cited by 168
“To defend themselves, cells encode means of inhibiting this lateral spread, such as restriction-modification and clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems [10,11].”
BackgroundMultilayered genetic safeguards limit growth of microorganisms to defined environments
Gallagher, R. R., Patel, J. R., Interiano, A. L., Rovner, A. J., & Isaacs, F. J. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1378 · Cited by 156
“organisms, or could be expanded by use of other previously characterized restriction-modification enzyme pairs (44), provided that they are compatible with native methylation patterns.”
BackgroundBacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria
Forde, A., & Fitzgerald, G. F. (1999) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1002027321171 · Cited by 158
“The severity of restriction is dependent on the system and the phage; in general the efficiency of plaquing (EOP) of the phage decreases logarithmically as the number of sites in the viral DNA molecule increases (Wilson & Murray 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialHarmer, C. J., & Hall, R. M. (2015) · Plasmid · doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.04.003 · Cited by 156
Kong, H. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.17.3216 · Cited by 141
“The designations are based on enzyme subunit composition, co-factor requirements, DNA specificity characteristics and reaction products (1).”
BackgroundBurnett, B. J., Barron, P. M., & Choe, W. (2012) · CrystEngComm · doi:10.1039/c2ce06692k · Cited by 144
Persisting Viral Sequences Shape Microbial CRISPR-based Immunity
Weinberger, A. D., Sun, C. L., Pluciński, M. M., Denef, V. J., Thomas, B. C., Horvath, P., Barrangou, R., Gilmore, M. S., Getz, W. M., & Banfield, J. F. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002475 · Cited by 143
“For example, well-studied restriction-modification systems often preserve genomic integrity by methylating prokaryotic DNA, enabling prokaryotes to recognize and cleave unmethylated foreign DNA [2].”
BackgroundInfluentialSequence Analysis of the Complete Genome of an Iridovirus Isolated from the Tiger Frog
He, J. G., Lü, L., Deng, M., He, H. H., Weng, S. P., Wang, X. H., Zhou, S. Y., Long, Q. X., Wang, X. Z., & Chan, S. M. (2002) · Virology · doi:10.1006/viro.2001.1245 · Cited by 142
Jeltsch, A., & Pingoud, A. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02198833 · Cited by 141
“They seem to be very effective in this function, as can be deduced from the fact that based on crude estimates most bacteria harbor one or more RM system (Wilson and Murray 1991) and that for species with many RM systems, like Neisseria gonorrhea, with 13 identified RM systems (Piekarowicz and Stein 1995), no bacterio-”
BackgroundInfluentialCytosine Methylation and DNA Repair
Walsh, C. P., & Xu, G. L. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-31390-7_11 · Cited by 143
“of a restriction/modification (RM) system that is a crucial defense against invading viral DNA (Wilson and Murray 1991).”
BackgroundAndo, T., Xu, Q. S., Torres, M., Kusugami, K., Israel, D. A., & Blaser, M. J. (2000) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02049.x · Cited by 138
Plasmid addiction systems: perspectives and applications in biotechnology
Kroll, J., Klinter, S., Schneider, C., Voß, I., & Steinbüchel, A. (2010) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00170.x · Cited by 135
“…Nakayama and Kobayashi (1998) ssoII SsoII/M.SsoII Shigella sonnei Karyagina et al. (1997); Kobayashi (2004) paeR71 PaeR71/M.PaeR71 P. aeroginosa Wilson and Murray (1991); Kusano et al. (1995); Kobayashi (2004) pvuII PvuII/M.PvuII P. vulgaris Tao et al. (1991); Cheng et al. (1994); Calvin-Koons…”
BackgroundEnhanced 5-methylcytosine detection in single-molecule, real-time sequencing via Tet1 oxidation
Clark, T. A., Lu, X., Luong, K., Dai, Q., Boitano, M., Turner, S. W., He, C., & Korlach, J. (2013) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-4 · Cited by 139
“Many of these MTases are paired with restriction endonucleases as part of a restriction-modification system that protects the organism from foreign DNA [23].”
BackgroundA novel host-specific restriction system associated with DNA backbone S-modification in Salmonella
Xu, T., Yao, F., Zhou, X., Deng, Z., & You, D. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq610 · Cited by 134
“enterica, functioning like DNA methylation in prokaryotes for the protection of homologous DNA against host-specific restriction of foreign DNA (12,16).”
BackgroundPhylogenomic analysis of the GIY-YIG nuclease superfamily
Dunin-Horkawicz, S., Feder, M., & Bujnicki, J. M. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-98 · Cited by 133
“This process is very similar to the modus operandi of restrictrion-modification (RM) systems, which comprise a restriction endonuclease (REase) that degrades foreign DNA by cleaving specific target sites and a methyltransferase (MTase) that modifies bases in the targets in the self DNA to render them resistant to clea…”
Divalent Metal Ions at the Active Sites of the EcoRV and EcoRI Restriction Endonucleases
Vipond, I. B., Baldwin, G. S., & Halford, S. E. (1995) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00002a037 · Cited by 131
Shin, H., Lee, J.-H., Kim, H., Choi, Y., Heu, S., & Ryu, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043392 · Cited by 130
“In this case, these collected phage-resistant strains are probably not lysogens, suggesting that host defense mechanisms such as CRISPR [62,63] or restriction-modification systems [64,65] or still unknown host defense mechanisms are probably activated during growth recovery.”
BackgroundDNA phosphorothioate modification—a new multi-functional epigenetic system in bacteria
Wang, L., Jiang, S., Deng, Z., Dedon, P. C., & Chen, S. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy036 · Cited by 131
Structure, function and mechanism of exocyclic DNA methyltransferases
Bheemanaik, S., Reddy, Y. V. R., & Rao, D. N. (2006) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20060854 · Cited by 126
Levin, B. R. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001171 · Cited by 125
“endonucleases) which appear to have that role [13,14].”
BackgroundMeisel, A., Mackeldanz, P., Bickle, T. A., Krüger, D. H., & Schroeder, C. (1995) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07296.x · Cited by 125
Methylation of DNA in Prokaryotes
Noyer-Weidner, M., & Trautner, T. A. (1993) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_4 · Cited by 124
Fisher, O. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh161 · Cited by 124
Approaches for bacteriophage genome engineering
Mahler, M., Costa, A. R., van Beljouw, S. P. B., Fineran, P. C., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2022) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.08.008 · Cited by 123
Perrin, A., Buckle, M., & Dujon, B. (1993) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05956.x · Cited by 122
Kristian, S. A., Lauth, X., Nizet, V., Goetz, F., Neumeister, B., Peschel, A., & Landmann, R. M. (2003) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/376533 · Cited by 121
Cota, I., Sánchez-Romero, M. A., Hernández, S. B., Pucciarelli, M. G., del Portillo, F. G., & Casadesús, J. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005667 · Cited by 119
“However, protection by restriction-modification systems can be expected to be incomplete as only a fraction of infecting phage genomes are modified [61].”
BackgroundViral Diversity Threshold for Adaptive Immunity in Prokaryotes
Weinberger, A. D., Wolf, Y. I., Lobkovsky, A. E., Gilmore, M. S., & Koonin, E. V. (2012) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00456-12 · Cited by 110
“Immune encounters arise in one of two ways: (i) CRISPRCas hosts can survive viral infection by possessing spacers matching viral protospacers, or (ii) CRISPR-Cas and CRISPRCas hosts can survive through non-CRISPR-based resistance mechanisms such as restriction modification (35, 51).”
BackgroundThe Escherichia coli Dam DNA Methyltransferase Modifies DNA in a Highly Processive Reaction
Urig, S., Gowher, H., Hermann, A., Beck, C., Fatemi, M., Humeny, A., & Jeltsch, A. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00371-6 · Cited by 113
Recognition and polymorphism in host—parasite genetics
Frank, S. A. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0145 · Cited by 113
“This reduction is probably caused by the high proportion of phage deaths that result when the phages invade and are restricted by bacteria for which the phage DNA is unmodified.”
BackgroundInfluentialGenomics of Staphylococcal Twort-like Phages - Potential Therapeutics of the Post-Antibiotic Era
Łobocka, M. B., Hejnowicz, M. S., Dąbrowski, K., Gozdek, A., Kosakowski, J., Witkowska, M., Ulatowska, M., Weber‐Dąbrowska, B., Kwiatek, M., Parasion, S., et al. (2012) · Advances in virus research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394438-2.00005-0 · Cited by 112
Orlowski, J., & Bujnicki, J. M. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn175 · Cited by 112
“This strongly biased distribution of similarities and dissimilarity made comparative sequence analysis of all REases impossible with the use of standard tools for sequence alignment and raised a question whether the diversity of amino acid sequences of REases indicates polyphyletic evolution (convergence) or extreme d…”
Mann, R. A., Smits, T. H. M., Bühlmann, A., Blom, J., Goesmann, A., Frey, J. E., Plummer, K. M., Beer, S. V., Luck, J., Duffy, B., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055644 · Cited by 112
“These modification systems generally have two primary functions; protection of host DNA (bacterial) and degradation of foreign DNA with restriction enzymes [32].”
BackgroundBussiere, D. E., Muchmore, S. W., Dealwis, C. G., Schluckebier, G., Nienaber, V. L., Edalji, R. P., Walter, K. A., Ladror, U. S., Holzman, T. F., & Abad‐Zapatero, C. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi973113c · Cited by 109
Restriction-modification systems as genomic parasites in competition for specific sequences.
Kusano, K., Naito, T., Handa, N., & Kobayashi, I. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.24.11095 · Cited by 109
Genomic mapping of phosphorothioates reveals partial modification of short consensus sequences
Cao, B., Chen, C., DeMott, M. S., Cheng, Q., Clark, T. A., Xiong, X., Zheng, X., Butty, V. L., Levine, S. S., Yuan, G., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4951 · Cited by 107
Jeltsch, A. (2003) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00652-8 · Cited by 107
“Restriction/modification (RM) systems (reviews: Wilson and Murray, 1991; Bickle and Kruger, 1993; Heitman, 1993; Raleigh and Brooks, 1998) consist of two activities: a methyltransferase (reviews: Cheng, 1995; Jeltsch, 2002) that modifies adenine or cytosine residues at certain recognition sites and a restriction endon…”
BackgroundSchmütte, C., & Jones, P. A. (1998) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/bchm.1998.379.4-5.377 · Cited by 107
Sun, X., Chen, W., Ivanov, S., MacLean, A. M., Wight, H., Ramaraj, T., Mudge, J., Harrison, M., & Fei, Z. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15472 · Cited by 106
The fission yeast gene pmt1+encodes a DNA methyltransferase homologue
Wilkinson, C. R. M., Bartlett, R., Nurse, P., & Bird, A. P. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.2.203 · Cited by 111
Xu, S.-Y., Corvaglia, A., Chan, S., Zheng, Y., & Linder, P. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr098 · Cited by 105
“Type I restriction enzymes are multi-subunit complexes consisting of M2R2S subunits, and their activity requires ATP hydrolysis (3).”
Crystal structure of PvuII endonuclease reveals extensive structural homologies to EcoRV
Athanasiadis, A., Vlassi, M., Kotsifaki, D., Tucker, P. A., Wilson, K. S., & Kokkinidis, M. (1994) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0794-469 · Cited by 105
Restriction endonucleases and modification methylases
Anderson, J. E. (1993) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/0959-440x(93)90197-s · Cited by 105
Lluch‐Senar, M., Luong, K., Lloréns‐Rico, V., Delgado, J., Fang, G., Spittle, K. E., Clark, T. A., Schadt, E. E., Turner, S. W., Korlach, J., et al. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003191 · Cited by 107
“The S subunit determines the specificity of both restriction and methylation [39].”
BackgroundXu, Q. S., Morgan, R., Roberts, R. J., & Blaser, M. J. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.17.9671 · Cited by 101
Determinants of Phage Host Range in Staphylococcus Species
Moller, A. G., Lindsay, J. A., & Read, T. D. (2019) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00209-19 · Cited by 101
“Sau42I is an example of a type IIS R-M system, which binds asymmetric DNA 271 sequences and cleaves outside the recognition site, unlike most type II systems (82).”
BackgroundThe dynamic genetic repertoire of microbial communities
Wilmes, P., Simmons, S. L., Denef, V. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00144.x · Cited by 99
“These include restriction-modification systems (Wilson & Murray, 1991), cell-surface manipulations (Weitz et al., 2005), exopolysaccharide production (Sutherland, 2001), biofilm formation (Sutherland et al., 2004), abortive infection systems (Sturino & Klaenhammer, 2007) and the CRISPR system…”
MethodDaccord, A., Ceccarelli, D., & Burrus, V. (2010) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07364.x · Cited by 99
“Bacteria encoding restriction-modification systems are usually less susceptible to phage infection (Wilson and Murray, 1991), which would be advantageous in the aquatic environment where bacteriophages thrive.”
BackgroundVirion-Associated Restriction Endonucleases of Chloroviruses
Agarkova, I. V., Dunigan, D. D., & Etten, J. L. V. (2006) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00486-06 · Cited by 96
The evolving functions of DNA methylation
Zilberman, D. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.07.004 · Cited by 94
“The host’s genome is protected by a cognate DNA methyltransferase that modifies the same site recognized by the endonuclease [2].”
BackgroundNakayama, Y., & Kobayashi, I. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6442 · Cited by 91
Derbyshire, V., Kowalski, J. C., Dansereau, J. T., Hauer, C. R., & Belfort, M. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0754 · Cited by 91
On the Origins, Structures and Functions of Restriction-Modification Enzymes
Heitman, J. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1666-2_4 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. G., & Murray, N. E.
- Affiliations
- New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 585-627
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2179631201
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- restriction-modification systems, restriction enzymes, DNA methylation, DNA methyltransferases, bacterial defense against foreign DNA, gene duplication, homologous genes, orthology, paralogy
- MeSH terms
- Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Viral, Genes, Bacterial, Methylation, Terminology as Topic, Substrate Specificity, DNA Restriction-Modification Enzymes, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review