Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE SOS RESPONSE: Recent Insights into umuDC-Dependent Mutagenesis and DNA Damage Tolerance

Sutton, Mark D, Smith, Bradley T, Godoy, Veronica G, Walker, Graham C·2000·Annual Review of Genetics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Be they prokaryotic or eukaryotic, organisms are exposed to a multitude of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damaging agents ranging from ultraviolet (UV) light to fungal metabolites, like Aflatoxin B 1. Furthermore, DNA damaging agents, such as reactive oxygen species, can be produced by cells themselves as metabolic byproducts and intermediates. Together, these agents pose a constant threat to an organism's genome. As a result, organisms have evolved a number of vitally important mechanisms to repair DNA damage in a high fidelity manner. They have also evolved systems (cell cycle checkpoints) that delay the resumption of the cell cycle after DNA damage to allow more time for these accurate processes to occur. If a cell cannot repair DNA damage accurately, a mutagenic event may occur. Most bacteria, including Escherichia coli, have evolved a coordinated response to these challenges to the integrity of their genomes. In E. coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response, and it controls both accurate and potentially mutagenic DNA repair functions [reviewed comprehensively in ( 25 ) and also in ( 78 , 94 )]. Recent advances have focused attention on the umuD+C+-dependent, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) process that is responsible for SOS mutagenesis ( 70 , 86 ). Here we discuss the SOS response of E. coli and concentrate in particular on the roles of the umuD+C+ gene products in promoting cell survival after DNA damage via TLS and a primitive DNA damage checkpoint.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.479

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Sutton, M. D., Smith, B. T., Godoy, V. G., & Walker, G. C.
Venue
Annual Review of Genetics
Published
2000-12
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
479-497
ISSN
  • 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2948
OpenAlex
W2096359570
Cited by
318
References
5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE SOS RESPONSE: Recent Insights into umuDC-Dependent Mutagenesis and DNA Damage Tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.479
The paper
Sutton, M. D., Smith, B. T., Godoy, V. G., & Walker, G. C. (2000). THE SOS RESPONSE: Recent Insights into umuDC-Dependent Mutagenesis and DNA Damage Tolerance. Annual Review of Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.