The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AFTER LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS
Abstract
▪ Abstract Legal consciousness as a theoretical concept and topic of empirical research developed to address issues of legal hegemony, particularly how the law sustains its institutional power despite a persistent gap between the law on the books and the law in action. Why do people acquiesce to a legal system that, despite its promises of equal treatment, systematically reproduces inequality? Recent studies have both broadened and narrowed the concept's reach, while sacrificing much of the concept's critical edge and theoretical utility. Rather than explaining how the different experiences of law become synthesized into a set of circulating schemas and habits, the literature tracks what particular individuals think and do. Because the relationships among consciousness and processes of ideology and hegemony often go unexplained, legal consciousness as an analytic concept is domesticated within what appear to be policy projects: making specific laws work better for particular groups or interests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,231
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
Seeman, M., & Goffman, E. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091442 · Cited by 10,716
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
The Condition of Postmodernity
Harris, C., & Harvey, D. (1991) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143544 · Cited by 8,605
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6498 · Cited by 8,149
Cited by
Institutional Violence Against Users of the Family Law Courts and the Legal Harassment Scale
Clemente, M., Padilla-Racero, D., Espinosa, P., Reig-Botella, A., & Gandoy-Crego, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00001 · Cited by 267
(2017) · Cited by 31
Trial by Power: Some Preliminary Observatrions on the Judicial Roles of Taoist Martial Deities
Katz, P. R. (2008) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1179/073776908803501150 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Silbey, S. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 323-368
- ISSN
- 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-3631
- OpenAlex
- W2102054182
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 155
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AFTER LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938
- The paper
- Silbey, S. S. (2005). AFTER LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.