Cited by 343Legal processes and jurisprudencePolicing Practices and PerceptionsSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 190 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness

Open access

MacCoun, Robert J.·2005·Annual Review of Law and Social Science

DOI 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract The procedural justice literature has grown enormously since the early work of Thibaut and Walker in the 1970s. Since then, the finding that citizens care enormously about the process by which outcomes are reached—even unfavorable outcomes—has been replicated a wide range of methodologies (including panel surveys, psychometric work, and experimentation), cultures (throughout North America, Europe, and Asia), and settings (including tort litigation, policing, taxpayer compliance, support for public policies, and organizational citizenship). We have learned a great deal about the antecedents and consequences of these judgments. In particular, the work of Tom Tyler and Allan Lind and their colleagues suggests that people care about voice, dignity, and respect for relational and symbolic reasons rather than (or in addition to) instrumental reasons. This finding has benevolent implications for governance and social cooperation, but also some troubling implications, leaving people susceptible to manipulation and exploitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Gladwin, T. N., & Hofstede, G. (1981) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257651 · Cited by 20,550
Untitled work
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A. M., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,195
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814 · cited 1×
“Taylor and Brown (1988) review a large body of evidence that “overly positive self-evaluations, exaggerated perceptions of control or mastery, and unrealistic optimism are characteristic of normal human thought (p. 193)” and essential to healthy coping.”
Background
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Weber, M. (2002) · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch3 · Cited by 6,868
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Poggi, G. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300342 · Cited by 6,851
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585 · cited 5×
“Moreover, procedural justice scholars have consistently and explicitly noted the risk of false consciousness in their writings (e.g., Lind & Tyler, 1988; MacCoun, Lind, & Tyler; Tyler et al., 1997).”
BackgroundInfluential
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.
Colquitt, J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 · Cited by 6,043 · cited 1×
“…or confirmatory factor analyses are used to establish that theoretically distinct concepts are, in fact, empirically distinguishable (see Blader & Tyler, 2003; Cohen-Charash & Spector, 2002, 2003; Colquitt, 2001; Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, & Porter, 2001; Skitka, Winquist, & Hutchinson, 2003).”
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942

Show all 190 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441 · DOI · Paper page
Associated Press. 2005. Court tells Los Angeles City Council to listen. NY Times , National Section, A15. Jan. 2
10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
10.1037//0033-2909.120.2.189 · DOI
Folger R, 1984, Represent. Res. Soc. Psychol., 14, 88
10.1037//0022-3514.37.12.2253 · DOI
10.1037//0003-066X.48.3.234 · DOI
French JR, 1959, Studies in Social Power, 150
Galanter M, 1998, Univ. Cincinnati Law Rev., 66, 805
10.2307/1129922 · DOI
10.2307/3005797 · DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.700 · DOI
Lind EA, 1990, Arbitrating High-Stakes Cases: An Evaluation of Court-Annexed Arbitration in a US District Court
Lind EA, 2001, Advances in Organizational Behavior, 56
10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.952 · DOI · Paper page
10.1037/1076-8998.6.4.332 · DOI
10.1037//0033-2909.88.2.245 · DOI
Thibaut J, 1975, Procedural Justice.
Thibaut J, 1978, Calif. Law Rev., 26, 1271
10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.850 · DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1034 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 343

Broadening the Lens of Procedural Justice Beyond the Courtroom: A Case Study of Legal Financial Obligations in the Juvenile Court
Paik, L., & Packard, C. C. (2023) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2022.77 · Cited by 4
Talking the Talk
Bartels, L., & Richards, K. (2013) · Alternative Law Journal · doi:10.1177/1037969x1303800107 · Cited by 4
Implementing the citizen focus agenda: a case study in police leadership
Fisher, A., & Kirby, S. (2014) · The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services · doi:10.1108/ijlps-06-2014-0005 · Cited by 4
“183), a finding that holds across all ethnic groups and issues (MacCoun, 2005).”
Background
All Else Being Equal: Overcoming the Egalitarian Norm
Bornstein, B. H., Gervais, S. J., Dietrich, H. L., & Escamilla, J. H. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0623-9_1 · Cited by 4
6 The Supreme Court, Social Psychology, and Group Formation
Devins, N. E., & Federspiel, W. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0006 · Cited by 4
Unexpected events during survey design and trust in the police: A systematic reviewPreprint
Nägel, C., & Nivette, A. E. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ubnaf · Cited by 4
Why women's equal representation increases policy losers’ consent: Revisiting the double‐edged sword of procedural fairness
Agerberg, M., & Wängnerud, L. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.70021 · Cited by 4
Control! Why employees should have a voice in automated decision-making
Hellwig, P., Schmid-Palzer, J., & Maier, G. W. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102113 · Cited by 3
Procedural Justice and the Design of Administrative Dispute Resolution Procedures
Wever, M., & Ybema, J. F. (2023) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-023-00428-4 · Cited by 9
“These efforts will therefore not be seen as genuine nor beneficial to their client (see also: MacCoun, 2005).”
Drivers of hunter compliance and satisfaction with mandatory harvest reporting
Buskirk, A. N. V., Boley, B. B., Killmaster, C. H., Johannsen, K. L., & D’Angelo, G. J. (2025) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.1002/wlb3.01346 · Cited by 3
Responsible recreation planning in Gatineau Park, Québec
Donohoe, H., & Gilmore, T. C. (2012) · Leisure/Loisir · doi:10.1080/14927713.2012.747276 · Cited by 3
“However, reworking traditional concepts of power and negotiating power redistribution are complex processes that are not easily resolved (Lachapelle & McCool, 2005; MacCoun, 2005).”
Background
15 Defining Good Judging
Wistrich, A. J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0015 · Cited by 3
Tell It to the Judge: Procedural Justice and a Community Court in Brooklyn
Bornstein, A. S., Marcus, A. A., Curtis, R., Rivera, S., & Swaner, R. (2016) · PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review · doi:10.1111/plar.12190 · Cited by 3
Perspective Differences in Trial Process: A Comparison of Judges, Juries and Litigants
Jones, A. M., Jones, S., & Duron, A. (2018) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1483274 · Cited by 3
“However, research conducted since Thibaut and Walker’s seminal theory suggests that simply having a voice, regardless of its effect on outcome, influences subsequent perceptions of fairness (MacCoun, 2005).”
Method
Historical Themes of Legitimacy
Cao, L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17731-6_1 · Cited by 3
Why Is Fairness ‘Grubby’? - Semantics, Etymology, and Perspectives in Dispute Resolution
Wilson, B. M., & Wilson, A. (2007) · Texas A&M Law Review · doi:10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.24 · Cited by 3
Decision Responsiveness and the Legitimacy of Public Agencies
Seyd, B., Cichocka, A. K., & Panayiotou, O. (2020) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsaa065 · Cited by 3
Age differences in understanding precedent-setting decisions and authorities’ responses to violations of deontic rules
Klaczynski, P. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.010 · Cited by 3
“Legitimacy is a complex concept that was not entirely captured by the data collected here (see MacCoun, 2005; Passini & Morselli, 2009; Piquero et al., 2005; Tyler, 2005).”
Background
Truth in the Shadow of Justice
Rowen, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5422-9_8 · Cited by 3
4 Persuasion in the Decision Making of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Wrightsman, L. S. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0004 · Cited by 3
Minority Perception of Police Legitimacy in Finland: The Patterns and Predictors
Egharevba, S. (2018) · European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice · doi:10.1163/15718174-02604002 · Cited by 5
Pathways to preferences for collaborative conflict resolution: Disputants’ process goals drive preferences.
Votruba, A. M., Noetzel, J. S., & Herzfeld, A. L. (2022) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000377 · Cited by 3
The Effects of Procedures on Social Interaction: A Literature ReviewPreprint
Mertins, V. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3
Why are expectations of grievance resolution systems not met? A multi-level exploration of three case studies in Australia
Webster, P. J. (2010) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 3
Identity, Legitimacy and Making Sensee of Police ViolencePreprint
Bradford, B., Milani, J., & Jackson, J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2793818 · Cited by 3
The role of parents and parens patriae
Pennington, L. (2013) · doi:10.17760/d20003207 · Cited by 3
Helping citizens to lobby themselves. Experimental evidence on the effects of citizen lobby engagement on internal efficacy and political supportPreprint
Aizenberg, E., Werner, H., & van Geldere, S. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6v2jb · Cited by 3
“More Than Just a Therapist”: Psychotherapist Perspectives of the Impact of Boundary-Setting on Therapeutic Alliances in Youth Residential Treatment Facilities
Stanek, C. J. (2025) · Residential Treatment for Children & Youth · doi:10.1080/0886571x.2025.2484220 · Cited by 2
“Previous research within correctional facilities has shown that dual relationships can be helpful when clients perceive them to be fair, respectful, and driven by kind intentions (MacCoun, 2005).”
Mitigating the judicial human–AI fairness gap
Chen, B. M., Hermstrüwer, Y., Langenbach, P., Stremitzer, A., & Tobia, K. P. (2026) · The Journal of Legal Analysis · doi:10.1093/jla/laag007 · Cited by 5
14 Evaluating Judges
Mitchell, G. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0014 · Cited by 2
Impact of statutory revisions to family-petitioned civil commitment in South Korea
Oh, H., Cho, Y.-H., Bae, J., Holley, L. C., Shafer, M. S., Kim, K., & Lee, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101982 · Cited by 2
Mediation as a 21st century conflict resolution mechanism: Exploring procedural fairness experiences of mediation users in Ghanaian courts
Benson, G., & Asaah-Junior, S. K. (2024) · Conflict Resolution Quarterly · doi:10.1002/crq.21429 · Cited by 2
Procedural justice, neighborhood opportunities and police legitimacy
Ward, J. T., Bennett, J. Z., & Olaghere, A. (2024) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-01-2024-0006 · Cited by 2
Social impacts of the Regional Forest Agreement on members of the forest industry in north-eastern New South Wales
Loxton, E. A., Schirmer, J., & Kanowski, P. J. (2012) · Australian Forestry · doi:10.1080/00049158.2012.10676410 · Cited by 2
“Well-managed negotiation processes are therefore needed to ensure people feel that the efforts they have put into participatory processes are valued, and that those processes and outcomes are legitimate (MacCoun 2005; Gross 2007).”
Background
Digging the Dugway?: Understanding Involvement in Local Politics
Marquart‐Pyatt, S. T., & Petrzelka, P. (2009) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330903091670 · Cited by 2
“…process not being significant, as noted earlier, prior studies suggest that procedural aspects related to how residents perceive the fairness of the process are on par with and in some instance as much of a concern as outcomes and inclusiveness of participatory processes (MacCoun, 2004).”
BackgroundResult
The role of parents and parens patriae: developing views of legitimacy and justice in juvenile delinquency court
Pennington, L. (2013) · Cited by 2
Improving Courtroom Communication
Farley, E. J., Jensen, E., & Rempel, M. (2014) · Cited by 2
The Impact of Political Conviction on the Relation Between Winning or Losing and Political Dissatisfaction
Abdelzadeh, A. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014535414 · Cited by 2
“…who perceive—on the basis of past experiences—that they are being treated fairly by authorities have greater trust in political institutions (e.g., Booth & Seligson, 2009; Esaiasson, 2010; Grimes, 2006; Hibbing & Theiss-Morse, 2001; Linde, 2011; MacCoun, 2005; A. H. Miller & Listhaug, 1999).”
Background
12 Every Jury Trial Is a Bench Trial: Judicial Engineering of Jury Disputes
Rowland, C. K., Traficanti, T. M., & Vernon, E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0012 · Cited by 2
Democratic Deliberation and the Ethical Review of Human Subjects Research
Persad, G. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.003.0014 · Cited by 2
“Concerns that procedural protections such as rights of voice and representation are inferior to substantive protections have arisen elsewhere in criminal and civil law (Cassell 2011; MacCoun 2005), and in the development of community advisory boards for clinical research (Recommendations 2009).”
Background
Legal Issues: Public Opinion
MacCoun, R. J., & Martin, K. D. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86071-7 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
OMBUDS AND TITLE IX COORDINATORS: PROCEDURAL CONVERGENCE OF UNIVERSITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS FOR HANDLING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT
Pappas, B. A. (2015) · KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) · Cited by 2
Procedural justice in international negotiations on climate change
Grasso, M. E., & Sacchi, S. (2011) · BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) · Cited by 3
Relational and Instrumental Perspectives on Compliance with the Law among People Experiencing HomelessnessPreprint
Kyprianides, A., Bradford, B., Jackson, J., Stott, C., & Pósch, K. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2ber5 · Cited by 2
Procedural Justice on Trial
Ansems, L. F. M. (2021) · doi:10.33540/499 · Cited by 3
Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in JudgingPreprint
Robbennolt, J. K., MacCoun, R. J., & Darley, J. M. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1133184 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law
Ruitenbeek-Bart, F. M., & Akkermans, A. J. (2025) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws14050068 · Cited by 1
Chapter 1: Tax Fairness: Reconceptualizing Taxation and Inequalities
de la Feria, R. (2015) · EATLP international tax series. · doi:10.59403/3hn518n001 · Cited by 1
“You’re not to speak unless you’re spoken to”: parent voice in public law proceedings in England and Wales
HUNTER, G. M., & Campbell, N. (2026) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2026.2614852 · Cited by 1
“Relational justice is an important constituent of people’s assessments of their treat-ment by legal authorities (MacCoun 2005).”
Mediating under the shadow of AI: Public reactions to procedural and substantive roles of AI in court-annexed mediation
Park, H. J. (2026) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106323 · Cited by 1
AI and Courts
Sourdin, T., & Barry, B. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009744225.004 · Cited by 1
RESPECT: The Missing Policy Tool of Welfare Reform
Lens, V. (2010) · Social Work · doi:10.1093/sw/55.3.281 · Cited by 1
“There is a long and persuasive scholarly literature demonstrating the importance of respect, and fairness in general, when citizens’ interact with government authorities (MacCoun, 2005; Tyler, 2006; Tyler & Huo, 2002).”
Background
Youth participation in child welfare decision making: A focused ethnography
Augsberger, A. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8bp0253 · Cited by 1
“Procedural Justice Procedural justice theory has been used widely over the past three decades to examine perceptions of fairness in bureaucratic decision-making practices (MacCoun, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluential
16 Expertise of Court Judges
Shanteau, J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0016 · Cited by 1
Status Determinations in International Waters and in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba
Dastyari, A. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316181584.006 · Cited by 1
Procedural Justice and the Discursive Construction of Narratives at Trial
Ainsworth, J. (2017) · Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) · doi:10.7358/lcm-2017-001-ains · Cited by 1
Discretionary Summary Justice
Farmer, C. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in criminology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8869-8_2 · Cited by 1
Juror motivations: applying procedural justice theory to juror decision making
Politis, S., Sivasubramaniam, D., Klettke, B., Nolan, M., Horan, J., & Schuller, R. A. (2020) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2020.1849691 · Cited by 1
“…of the group value model, which posits that procedures are judged to be fair to the extent that they convey a person’s good standing in a social group (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler, 1989); the group value model now dominates the procedural justice literature and is widely supported (MacCoun, 2005).”
Background
Justice as fairness or retribution? Citizen reactions to domestic trials of wartime violence
Kitagawa, R. (2023) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433221148223 · Cited by 4
“However, individuals are especially likely to view an institutional process as fair when they believe that victims have been granted adequate voice and representation in its proceedings (Lind & Kanfer, 1990; MacCoun, 2005; Ramirez, 2008; Tyler, 2000).”
Procedural Fairness in Physician–Patient Communication: A Predictor of Health Outcomes in a Cohort of Adults with Overweight or Obesity
Wittleder, S., Viglione, C., Reinelt, T., Dixon, A., Jagmohan, Z., Orstad, S. L., Beasley, J. M., Wang, B., Wylie‐Rosett, J., & Jay, M. R. (2024) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-024-10282-6 · Cited by 1
“Procedural fairness theory has been studied in various contexts such as tort litigation, policing, organizational commitment, and taxpayer compliance [12].”
Judges
He, X. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198927815.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Thriving as the Synergy of Wellness, Fairness, and Worthiness
Prilleltensky, I., Scarpa, M. P., Martino, S. D., & Ness, O. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009308953.001 · Cited by 1
18 Building a Better Judiciary
Farber, D. A., & Sherry, S. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0018 · Cited by 1
Disputant Experience and Preferences for Mediated or Adjudicated Processes in Administrative Agencies: The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Settlement Part Program
Malatesta, D., Bingham, L. B., & Scott, S. F. (2019) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.1177/0019793919882928 · Cited by 1
“These effects are true of both lawyers and inexperienced clients, though they vary in degree, with lawyers reporting greater process fairness than do clients (MacCoun 2005: 177).”
BackgroundInfluential
What Can Go Wrong When Everything is Right? Using Organizational Justice to Understand Police Misconduct and Improve Personnel Systems
Busby, A., Thornton-Lugo, M. A., Parker, L., & Strah, N. (2022) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2022.02.006 · Cited by 1
“MacCoun (2005) specifically argued that procedural justice can produce numerous positive benefits but runs the risk of being leveraged by organizations for the purpose of controlling others.”
Background
Negotiating Justice: Defendant Perspectives of Plea Bargaining In American Criminal Courts
Hussemann, J. M. (2013) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Kan rättvisa procedurer stärka förtroendet för prioriteringar
Nedlund, A., & Garpenby, P. (2008) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Innovation of Lower Court Procedures: Working from Terms of ReferencePreprint
Barendrecht, M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2230096 · Cited by 1
The Fels Effect: Responsive Regulation and the Impact of Business Opinions of the ACCCPreprint
Parker, C., & Nielsen, V. L. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 1
Outrage Fatigue? Cognitive Costs and Decisions to BlamePreprint
Bambrah, V., Cameron, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6y4ad · Cited by 1
Introduction
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.002.0008 · Cited by 1
A Case Study of Relative Satisfaction with Justice in State Courts: Perceptions of Access and Fairness Among Hispanics/Latinos and Whites
Bleuenstein, C. G. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 1
Just a Thought?
Rose, M. R. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118701430.ch6
?He did everything he possibly could for me?? Medical malpractice claimants? experiences of legal services
Melville, A., Stephen, F. H., Irving, J., & Krause, T. (2012) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Strength and Direction of Demographic Variables as Determinants of Driver-Chauffeur Satisfaction in Judicial Procedural Fairness
Baffour-Awuah, E. (2015) · Mathematical theory and modeling
Trust-based regulation
Mendoza, J. (2014) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
A WHITE PAPER OF THE AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION THE VOICE OF THE JUDICIARY
Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2007)
The Promise of Accountability: Countering Racial Bias in Decision-Making
Carbone, C. S. (2014) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Students' views on the police in the Republic of Macedonia
Buzarovska, G., Bačanović, O., Kalajdziev, G., Drakulevski, A. G., Misoski, B., Gogov, B., Ilic, D., & Jovanova, N. (2020) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor)
Procedural justice in victim-police interactions: A mixed methods study
Elliott, I. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/589020dad829e
“Since then an impressive body of research in social, legal, and organisational settings has demonstrated that people place a significant value on the fairness of the process by which outcomes are achieved (MacCoun, 2005).”
Background
Going Outside the Law: The Role of the State in Forming Attitudes to Extralegal ViolencePreprint
Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1879976
The Fusing of Mediation, Lawyers and Legal Systems
Clark, B. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23474-3_5
CIVILINIO GINČO ŠALIŲ SUVOKTAS TEISĖJŲ ELGESIO TEISINGUMAS
Barysė, D., & Valickas, G. (2016) · Teisė · doi:10.15388/teise.2016.99.10111
zur Erlangung eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Doctor rerum politicarum) der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der
Gießen, J.-L.-U. (2009)
Procedural Justice and Policing: Four New Directions
Hollander-Blumoff, R. E. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108354721.028
Preserving the Integrity of Courts: Can State Courts Influence Public Knowledge and Perceptions of the Judicial Branch?
Barwick, C. M. (2016) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
Lay Participation System and Trust in the Justice System
Fujita, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0338-7_4
Procedural justice and police legitimacy: untangling the effects of race/ethnicity-based situation and organizational characteristics of police agency
Li, L. (2024) · Library, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware) · doi:10.58088/jv1n-2g12
De toekomst is aan de surfende criminoloog
Maesschalck, J. (2019) · Tijdschrift voor Criminologie · doi:10.5553/tvc/0165182x2019061004006
Understanding residents’ public acceptance of the development of solar farms
Reitsma, A. (2020)
The Individual and Administrative Justice
Creutzfeldt, N. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.13
Procedurele rechtvaardigheid bij de politierechter: empirisch-juridisch inzicht in het belang van een als eerlijk ervaren behandeling
Ansems, L. F. M., van den Bos, K., & Mak, E. (2021) · Boom strafblad · doi:10.5553/bsb/266669012021002006007
Mist Over a Meadow: Tax Designation Effects on CompliancePreprint
Cingl, L., Lichard, T., & Miklánek, T. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4068830
“The first potential explanation is a positive change in how taxpayers perceive procedural/institutional justice when they are asked for their opinions (MacCoun, 2005; Tyler, 2006), increasing trust and reciprocal feelings towards the government.”
Background
Literature Survey
Olteanu, Y. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95324-3_3
Examining the relationship factor in a criminal justice setting : therapeutic alliance, the dual-role and principles of effective correctional counselling
Gutierrez, L. (2010) · doi:10.22215/etd/2010-08999
Wisdom
Kiser, R. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108238816.006
Series Foreword
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.002.0005
Contributors
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.002.0007
Copyright Page
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.002.0004
Benefits v. Fairness—Priorities in Public Attitudes
Spáč, P., Voda, P., Tóth, M., Nemčok, M., & Hrbková, L. (2022) · Political corruption and governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10772-6_4

Authors: MacCoun, R. J.
Affiliations: University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author: MacCoun, Robert J.
ORCID: MacCoun, Robert J.
Venue: Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Published: 2005-12-01
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Pages: 171-201
ISSN: 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
1550-3631
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958
OpenAlex: W2124877571
Cited by: 343
References: 190
Citations by year: 2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI: 14.39
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-sa
Locations: Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords: procedural justice, voice, control, sense of belonging, public trust in government, social cooperation, public policy support, organizational citizenship behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks