CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 894Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingDental Research and COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral Microbial Communities: Biofilms, Interactions, and Genetic Systems

Kolenbrander, Paul E.·2000·Annual Review of Microbiology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract Oral microbial-plaque communities are biofilms composed of numerous genetically distinct types of bacteria that live in close juxtaposition on host surfaces. These bacteria communicate through physical interactions called coaggregation and coadhesion, as well as other physiological and metabolic interactions. Streptococci and actinomyces are the major initial colonizers of the tooth surface, and the interactions between them and their substrata help establish the early biofilm community. Fusobacteria play a central role as physical bridges that mediate coaggregation of cells and as physiological bridges that promote anaerobic microenvironments which protect coaggregating strict anaerobes in an aerobic atmosphere. New technologies for investigating bacterial populations with 16S rDNA probes have uncovered previously uncultured bacteria and have offered an approach to in situ examination of the spatial arrangement of the participant cells in oral-plaque biofilms. Flow cells with saliva-coated surfaces are particularly useful for studies of biofilm formation and observation. The predicted sequential nature of colonization of the tooth surface by members of different genera can be investigated by using these new technologies and imaging the cells in situ with confocal scanning laser microscopy. Members of at least seven genera now can be subjected to genetic studies owing to the discovery of gene-transfer systems in these genera. Identification of contact-inducible genes in streptococci offers an avenue to explore bacterial responses to their environment and leads the way toward understanding communication among inhabitants of a multispecies biofilm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 128 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bachrach G, Andersen N, Kolenbrander PE. 1999. Isolation and characterization of aFusobacterium nucleatumplasmid. Abstr. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Conf. Microb. Biodiversity, 1st, Chicago, p. 72Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.
  2. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Clemans DL, Whittaker CJ, Klier CM. 1999. Potential role of functionally similar coaggregation mediators in bacterial succession. See Ref.88A, pp. 171–86
  3. Kolenbrander PE, Dû L, Aspiras M, Li S, Kazmerzak K, et al. 2000. Spatial organization and contact-induced gene expression in biofilms ofStreptococcus gordoniiChallis. InStreptococci and Streptococcal Diseases—Entering the New Millennium, ed. D Martin, J Tagg. In press
  4. Rosan B, Correia FF, DiRienzo JM. 1998. Corncobs: a model for oral microbial biofilms. InOral Biofilms and Plaque Control, ed. HJ Busscher, LV Evans, pp. 145–62. Harwood: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  5. Socransky SS, 1994, BioTechniques, 17, 788
  6. Tønjum T, 1985, Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. B, 93, 389
  7. Wimpenny J. 1999. Laboratory models of biofilm. See Ref.88A, pp. 89–110

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 889

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kolenbrander, P. E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kolenbrander, Paul E.
Venue
Annual Review of Microbiology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2000-10
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
413-437
ISSN
  • 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-3251
DOI
10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413
OpenAlex
W2102838174
Cited by
894
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 48
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
dental plaque, co-aggregation, Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Fusobacteria, flow cell, confocal laser scanning microscopy, gene transfer systems, polymicrobial biofilms, bacterial communication
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Dental Plaque, Mouth, Ecosystem, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review