The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OLFACTORY MEMORY FORMATION IN DROSOPHILA: From Molecular to Systems Neuroscience
Abstract
The olfactory nervous system of insects and mammals exhibits many similarities, which suggests that the mechanisms for olfactory learning may be shared. Molecular genetic investigations of Drosophila learning have uncovered numerous genes whose gene products are essential for olfactory memory formation. Recent studies of the products of these genes have continued to expand the range of molecular processes known to underlie memory formation. Recent research has also broadened the neuroanatomical areas thought to mediate olfactory learning to include the antennal lobes in addition to a previously accepted and central role for the mushroom bodies. The roles for neurons extrinsic to the mushroom body neurons are becoming better defined. Finally, the genes identified to participate in Drosophila olfactory learning have conserved roles in mammalian organisms, highlighting the value of Drosophila for gene discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourtchuladze, R., Frenguelli, B., Blendy, J., Cioffi, D., Schutz, G., & Silva, A. J. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90400-6 · Cited by 1,800
Abel, T., Nguyen, P. V., Barad, M., Deuel, T. A. S., Kandel, E. R., & Bourtchouladze, R. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81904-2 · Cited by 1,217
Genetic dissection of consolidated memory in Drosophila
Tully, T., Preat, T., Boynton, S. C., & Del Vecchio, M. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90398-0 · Cited by 924
Altered behavior and long-term potentiation in type I adenylyl cyclase mutant mice.
Wu, Z. L., Thomas, S. A., Villacres, E. C., Xia, Z., Simmons, M. L., Chavkin, C., Palmiter, R. D., & Storm, D. R. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.1.220 · Cited by 370
Waddell, S., Armstrong, J. D., Kitamoto, T., Kaiser, K., & Quinn, W. G. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00183-5 · Cited by 332
Beck, C. D. O., Schroeder, B., & Davis, R. L. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-08-02944.2000 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Cited by
Writing Memories with Light-Addressable Reinforcement Circuitry
Claridge-Chang, A., Roorda, R. D., Vrontou, E., Sjulson, L., Li, H., Hirsh, J., & Miesenböck, G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.034 · Cited by 484
Heterosynaptic plasticity underlies aversive olfactory learning in Drosophila
Hige, T., Aso, Y., Modi, M. N., Rubin, G. M., & Turner, G. C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.003 · Cited by 354
Tsao, C.-H., Chen, C.-C., Lin, C.-H., Yang, H.-Y., & Lin, S. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.35264 · Cited by 214
Associative Learning in Invertebrates
Hawkins, R. D., & Byrne, J. H. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021709 · Cited by 199
Testing Odor Response Stereotypy in the Drosophila Mushroom Body
Murthy, M., Fiete, I., & Laurent, G. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.040 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-07-21
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-302
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2154414197
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OLFACTORY MEMORY FORMATION IN DROSOPHILA: From Molecular to Systems Neuroscience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135651
- The paper
- Davis, R. L. (2005). OLFACTORY MEMORY FORMATION IN DROSOPHILA: From Molecular to Systems Neuroscience. Annual Review of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
