The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Architecture of Smell and Taste in Drosophila
Abstract
The chemical senses—smell and taste—allow animals to evaluate and distinguish valuable food resources from dangerous substances in the environment. The central mechanisms by which the brain recognizes and discriminates attractive and repulsive odorants and tastants, and makes behavioral decisions accordingly, are not well understood in any organism. Recent molecular and neuroanatomical advances in Drosophila have produced a nearly complete picture of the peripheral neuroanatomy and function of smell and taste in this insect. Neurophysiological experiments have begun to provide insight into the mechanisms by which these animals process chemosensory cues. Given the considerable anatomical and functional homology in smell and taste pathways in all higher animals, experimental approaches in Drosophila will likely provide broad insights into the problem of sensory coding. Here we provide a critical review of the recent literature in this field and comment on likely future directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a rewiew
Stocker, R. F. (1994) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/bf00305372 · Cited by 950
Self-citationExcitatory Local Circuits and Their Implications for Olfactory Processing in the Fly Antennal Lobe
Shang, Y., Claridge-Chang, A., Sjulson, L., Pypaert, M., & Miesenböck, G. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.034 · Cited by 359
A Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila
Dahanukar, A., Foster, K., van der Goes van Naters, W. M., & Carlson, J. R. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn765 · Cited by 286
Developmentally programmed remodeling of the Drosophila olfactory circuit
Marin, E. C., Watts, R. J., Tanaka, N. K., Ito, K., & Luo, L. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01614 · Cited by 177
Python, F., & Stocker, R. F. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10383 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Cited by
A GAL4-Driver Line Resource for Drosophila Neurobiology
Jenett, A., Rubin, G. M., Ngo, T.-T. B., Shepherd, D., Murphy, C., Dionne, H., Pfeiffer, B. D., Cavallaro, A., Hall, D., Jeter, J., et al. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,449
The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning
Aso, Y., Hattori, D., Yu, Y., Johnston, R. M., Iyer, N. A., Ngo, T.-T., Dionne, H., Abbott, L., Axel, R., Tanimoto, H., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04577 · Cited by 1,051
Chiang, A.-S., Lin, C.-Y., Chuang, C.-C., Chang, H.-M., Hsieh, C.-H., Yeh, C.-W., Shih, C.-T., Wu, J.-J., Wang, G.-T., Chen, Y.-C., et al. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.056 · Cited by 767
Presynaptic facilitation by neuropeptide signaling mediates odor-driven food search
Root, C. M., Ko, K. I., Jafari, A., & Wang, J. W. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.008 · Cited by 526
Liman, E. R., Zhang, Y. V., & Montell, C. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.022 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Vosshall, L. B., & Stocker, R. F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 505-533
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2118398316
- Cited by
- 870
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
