The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality and coping.
Abstract
Personality psychology addresses views of human nature and individual differences. Biological and goal-based views of human nature provide an especially useful basis for construing coping; the five-factor model of traits adds a useful set of individual differences. Coping—responses to adversity and to the distress that results—is categorized in many ways. Meta-analyses link optimism, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to more engagement coping; neuroticism to more disengagement coping; and optimism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness to less disengagement coping. Relations of traits to specific coping responses reveal a more nuanced picture. Several moderators of these associations also emerge: age, stressor severity, and temporal proximity between the coping activity and the coping report. Personality and coping play both independent and interactive roles in influencing physical and mental health. Recommendations are presented for ways future research can expand on the growing understanding of how personality and coping shape adjustment to stress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, due to personality differences, some individuals might be more predisposed to adaptive responses when facing disabilities and care needs in old age than others (Carver & Connor-Smith, 2010).”
From Toward a More Comprehensive Concept of Successful Aging: Disability and Care Needs: Table 1. (2016) · cites this paper as Carver & Connor-Smith, 2010
In the citing paper
“Personality traits are related to how individuals cope with problems [32].”
From Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism. (2013) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Prior literature on media use as a tool for coping tends to paint media use as a monolithic, and often problematic, coping behavior (e.g., Carver and Connor-Smith, 2010; Müller et al., 2016).”
From Media for Coping During COVID-19 Social Distancing: Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being (2020) · cites this paper as Carver and Connor-Smith, 2010
In the citing paper
“Coping strategies of the sample during the epidemic were assessed using selected items of the Brief COPE questionnaire [33]. This has been translated and validated in Greek using community samples from Greece and Cyprus [34].”
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Self-citationHandbook of Positive Psychology
(2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135336.001.0001 · Cited by 9,158
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0033-2909.121.3.417 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.375 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267 · DOI · Paper page
- Caspi A, 2006, Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 300
- Costa PT Jr, 1985, The NEO Personality Inventory Manual
- Elliot AJ, 2008, Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation
- 10.1037//0003-066X.35.9.790 · DOI
- Eysenck HJ, 1986, Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 2: Current Trends and Controversies, 213
- Graziano WG, 1999, Handbook of Personality, 795
- 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820 · DOI
- Higgins ET, 1996, The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior, 91
- 10.1037//0003-066X.44.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.452 · DOI · Paper page
- Miles JNV, 2003, Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Personality Assessment, 2, 99
- Najmi S, 2008, Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation, 447
- 10.1037//1089-2680.1.2.115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.552 · DOI
- Prokopcakova A, 2004, Studia Psychologica, 46, 235
- 10.1037//1040-3590.6.1.41 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Tellegen A, 1985, Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders, 681
- 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.626 · DOI
- Trapmann S, 2007, J. Psychol., 215, 132
- Wright RA, 1996, The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior, 424
- 10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.757 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Ismael, N., Jaber, A., Malkawi, S., Al Awady, S., & Ismael, T. (2024) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002453 · Cited by 9
Assessment of Resident Burnout After Formalization of Wellness Program
Schmeusser, B., Gauthier, Z., & Nagy, K. (2023) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usac004 · Cited by 7
(2015) · College student journal · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- ORCID
- Carver, Charles S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 679-704
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2143516576
- Semantic Scholar
- db1d459776b284eac8bde17626ba447b768e613b
- Cited by
- 2,424
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 147 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 147 · 2014: 126 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Commercializations Promotion Agency for R and D Outcomes
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA064710, CA64710)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- personality, coping, Big Five personality traits, individual differences, optimism, extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience, engagement coping, disengagement coping, stress
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Motivation, Personality, Research Design, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
