CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabour Market and Migration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A World of Difference: International Trends in Women's Economic Status

Charles, Maria·2011·Annual Review of Sociology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Around the globe and starting in the affluent West, women have made major, even revolutionary, strides toward equality with men. However, while access to major social institutions has equalized dramatically, expanded participation in labor markets and educational systems often comes in the form of gender-differentiated roles within these institutions. This article reviews international trends on different indicators of women's economic status and considers explanations for observed patterns. The forms of equality that tend to persist in advanced industrial societies are those that are readily interpreted as outcomes of free choices by formally equal but innately different men and women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Belkin L., 2003, New York Times Mag., 42
  2. Bradley K, 1996, Res. Sociol. Educ. Soc., 11, 63
  3. Charles M., 1998, Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil., 16, 89
  4. Cohany SR, 2007, Mon. Labor Rev., 130, 9
  5. Giele JZ., 2006, J. Comp. Policy Anal., 8, 115
  6. ILO (Int. Labour Off.), 2009, Global Employment Trends for Women March 2009
  7. Jackson RM. 2006. Opposing forces: how, why, and when will gender inequality disappear? See Blau et al. 2006, pp. 215–44
  8. Ridgeway CL. 2006. Gender as an organizing force in social relations: implications for the future of inequality. See Blau et al. 2006, pp. 265–87
  9. Schultz TW., 1961, Am. Econ. Rev., 51, 1
  10. UNDP (UN Dev. Program), 2007, Human Development Report 2007/2008
  11. U.S. Census Bur, 2008, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 263

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Charles, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Charles, Maria
ORCID
Charles, Maria
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2011-08-11
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
355-371
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
DOI
10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548
OpenAlex
W2130601864
Cited by
263
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
Keywords
women's economic status, gender inequality, gender roles, labor force participation, women's education, cross-national comparison, gender equality, women's empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review