Cited by 82Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBig Data and Business IntelligenceBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Blockchain analytics and artificial intelligence

Dillenberger, D. N., Novotny, P., Zhang, Q., Jayachandran, P., Gupta, H., Hans, S., Verma, D., Chakraborty, S. +4 more·2019·IBM Journal of Research and Development

Abstract

Blockchain records track information about financial payments, movements of products through supply chains, identity verification information, and many other assets. Analytics on this data can provide provenance histories, predictive planning, fraud identification, and regulatory compliance. In this paper, we describe analytics engines connected to blockchains to provide easy-to-use configurable dashboards, predictive models, provenance histories, and compliance checking. We also describe how blockchain data can be combined with external data sources for secure and private analytics, enable artificial intelligence (AI) model creation over geographically dispersed data, and create a history of model creation enabling provenance and lineage tracking for trusted AI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1147/jrd.2019.2900638

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has begun exploring DLT for auditing purposes in organizational contexts, and first results indicate feasibility of DLT for auditing AI.

    “Owing to DLTs characteristics (e.g., decentralization, high tamper resistance), research has recently begun exploring the application of DLT for auditing purposes in organizational contexts (Hofman et al. 2019), while first research results also indicate the feasibility of DLT for the auditing of AI (Dillenberger et al. 2019).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Dillenberger et al. 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dillenberger, D. N., Novotny, P., Zhang, Q., Jayachandran, P., Gupta, H., Hans, S., Verma, D., Chakraborty, S., Thomas, J. J., Walli, M. M., Vaculin, R., & Sarpatwar, K.
Venue
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Publisher
IBM
Published
2019-03
Volume
63
Issue
2/3
Pages
5:1-5:14
ISSN
0018-8646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915382319
Cited by
82
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IBM Journal of Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain analytics, artificial intelligence, blockchain data, provenance tracking, predictive modeling, fraud detection, regulatory compliance, external data integration, trustworthy AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review