Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liver Cirrhosis: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging—Pilot Study

Luciani, Alain, Vignaud, Alexandre, Cavet, Madeleine, Tran Van Nhieu, Jeanne, Mallat, Ariane, Ruel, Lucile, Laurent, Alexis, Deux, Jean-François, Brugieres, Pierre, Rahmouni, Alain·2008·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate a respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence combined with parallel acquisition to allow the calculation of pure molecular-based (D) and perfusion-related (D*, f) diffusion parameters, on the basis of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory, to determine if these parameters differ between patients with cirrhosis and patients without liver fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study; informed consent was waived. IVIM DW imaging was tested on three alkane phantoms, on which the signal-intensity decay curves according to b factors were logarithmically plotted. Ten b factors (0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800 sec/mm(2)) were used in patients. Patients with documented liver cirrhosis (cirrhotic liver group, n = 12) and patients without chronic liver disease (healthy liver group, n = 25) were included. The mean liver D, D*, and f values were measured and compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) computed by using four b values (0, 200, 400, 800 sec/mm(2)). Liver ADC and D, f, and D* parameters were compared between the cirrhotic liver group and healthy liver group. Means were compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: Signal-intensity decay curves were monoexponential on phantoms and biexponential in patients. In vivo, mean ADC values were significantly higher than D in the healthy liver group (ADC = 1.39 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.2 [standard deviation] vs D = 1.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.7) and in the cirrhotic liver group (ADC = 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.4 vs D = 1.19 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.5) (P = .03). ADC and D* were significantly reduced in the cirrhotic liver group compared with those in the healthy liver group (respective P values of .03 and .008). CONCLUSION: Restricted diffusion observed in patients with cirrhosis may be related to D* variations, which reflect decreased perfusion, as well as alterations in pure molecular water diffusion in cirrhotic livers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2493080080

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Luciani, A., Vignaud, A., Cavet, M., Tran Van Nhieu, J., Mallat, A., Ruel, L., Laurent, A., Deux, J.-F., Brugieres, P., & Rahmouni, A.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2008-12
Volume
249
Issue
3
Pages
891-899
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2144472068
Cited by
612
References
1
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Cirrhosis: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging—Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2493080080
The paper
Luciani, A., Vignaud, A., Cavet, M., Tran Van Nhieu, J., Mallat, A., Ruel, L., Laurent, A., Deux, J.-F., Brugieres, P., & Rahmouni, A. (2008). Liver Cirrhosis: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging—Pilot Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2493080080

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.