Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 730

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

Sorensen, A G, Buonanno, F S, Gonzalez, R G, Schwamm, L H, Lev, M H, Huang-Hellinger, F R, Reese, T G, Weisskoff, R M, Davis, T L, Suwanwela, N, Can, U, Moreira, J A, Copen, W A, Look, R B, Finklestein, S P, Rosen, B R, Koroshetz, W J·1996·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate acute stroke with conventional, multisection diffusion-weighted (DW), and hemodynamically weighted (HW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three MR imaging techniques were performed in 11 patients within 10 hours of the onset of acute hemiparesis. The volume of DW and HW abnormalities were compared with infarct volumes depicted at initial and/or follow-up MR or computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Findings at DW and HW imaging were abnormal in nine of the 11 patients, despite normal findings at initial CT and/or MR. In all nine patients, infarcts were depicted at follow-up CT or MR. The DW abnormality was generally smaller and the HW abnormality was generally larger than the infarct volume determined at subsequent imaging. In the two patients with normal findings at DW and HW imaging, symptoms resolved completely within 1-48 hours. CONCLUSION: Different aspects of hyperacute cerebral ischemia are depicted at DW and HW imaging before infarction is depicted at conventional MR or CT. These techniques may improve stroke diagnosis and may contribute to advances in treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668784

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sorensen, A. G., Buonanno, F. S., Gonzalez, R. G., Schwamm, L. H., Lev, M. H., Huang-Hellinger, F. R., Reese, T. G., Weisskoff, R. M., Davis, T. L., Suwanwela, N., Can, U., Moreira, J. A., Copen, W. A., Look, R. B., Finklestein, S. P., Rosen, B. R., & Koroshetz, W. J.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1996-05
Volume
199
Issue
2
Pages
391-401
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2129736986
Cited by
730
References
0
FWCI
49.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.