The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solvent Diffusion Model for Aging of Lithium-Ion Battery Cells
Open accessAbstract
This work presents a rigorous continuum mechanics model of solvent diffusion describing the growth of solid-electrolyte interfaces (SEIs) in Li-ion cells incorporating carbon anodes. The model assumes that a reactive solvent component diffuses through the SEI and undergoes two-electron reduction at the carbon-SEI interface. Solvent reduction produces an insoluble product, resulting in increasing SEI thickness. The model predicts that the SEI thickness increases linearly with the square root of time. Experimental data from the literature for capacity loss in two types of prototype Li-ion cells validates the solvent diffusion model. We use the model to estimate SEI thickness and extract solvent diffusivity values from the capacity loss data. Solvent diffusivity values have an Arrhenius temperature dependence consistent with solvent diffusion through a solid SEI. The magnitudes of the diffusivities and activation energies are comparable to literature values for hydrocarbon diffusion in carbon molecular sieves and zeolites. These findings, viewed in the context of recent SEI morphology studies, suggest that the SEI may be viewed as a single layer with both micro- and macroporosity that controls the ingress of electrolyte, anode passivation by the SEI, and cell performance during initial cycling as well as long-term operation. © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Arora, P., White, R. E., & Doyle, M. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838857 · Cited by 1,408
Self-citationAdvanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837858 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications
Barré, A., Deguilhem, B., Grolleau, S., Gérard, M., Suard, F., & Riu, D. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 · Cited by 1,758
Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S., & Qi, Y. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 · Cited by 1,639
Jaguemont, J., Boulon, L., & Dubé, Y. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.034 · Cited by 1,188
Pinson, M. B., & Bazant, M. Z. (2013) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.044302jes · Cited by 946
Calendar and cycle life study of Li(NiMnCo)O2-based 18650 lithium-ion batteries
Ecker, M., Nieto, N., Käbitz, S., Schmalstieg, J., Blanke, H., Warnecke, A., & Sauer, D. U. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Ploehn, H. J., Ramadass, P., & White, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- A456
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152492366
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.