Cited by 23Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

Blend Membranes Consisting of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) and Polysulfone Bearing 4-Nitrobenzimidazole for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Open access
Li, W., Fu, Y.-Z., Manthiram, A., Guiver, M. D.·2009·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

Low-cost blend membranes consisting of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) (an acidic polymer) and polysulfone-4-nitrobenzimidazole (PSf-NBIm) (a basic polymer) have been prepared with various PSf–NBIm contents and characterized by ion-exchange capacity, proton conductivity, and water uptake measurements. The blend membranes with PSf–NBIm contents of 2.5 and show higher proton conductivity and lower water uptake in water and methanol/water solutions at a given temperature than plain SPEEK. The blend membranes also exhibit better electrochemical performance and lower methanol crossover in a direct methanol fuel cell than plain SPEEK and Nafion 115 membranes due to an enhancement in proton conductivity through acid-base interactions and an insertion of the benzimidazole side groups into the ionic clusters of SPEEK, as indicated by small-angle X-ray scattering. The maximum power density of the blend membrane with a PSf–NBIm content of is 1.5 times higher than that of the Nafion 115 in methanol solution at .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.3040242

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [33]33. X. Ren, T. E. Springer, T. A. Zawodzinski, and S. Gottesfeld, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147, 92 ͑2000͒.
  2. [37]37. Z. Zhou, S. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Liu, and W. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 10824 ͑2005͒. B263 Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 156 ͑2͒ B258-B263 ͑2009͒ B263

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Fu, Y.-Z., Manthiram, A., & Guiver, M. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2009
Volume
156
Issue
2
Pages
B258
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999456274
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-07-1-0758, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Keywords
sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone), blend membranes, direct methanol fuel cells, proton conductivity, methanol crossover, acid-base interactions, ion exchange capacity, water absorption, Nafion 115, small-angle X-ray scattering, power density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review