Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bulk flow and diffusion in the cerebrospinal fluid system of the goat

Heisey, S. R., Held, D., Pappenheimer, J. R.·1962·American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content

Abstract

Ventriculocisternal perfusions were carried out on chronically prepared, unanesthetized goats. Measurements were made of steady-state rates at which inulin, fructose, creatinine, urea, K, Na, and labeled water (TOH) were removed from perfusion fluid at various hydrostatic and osmotic pressures. The ventricular system is virtually impermeable to inulin. Inulin is removed from subarachnoid spaces by bulk absorption at rates which vary linearly with hydrostatic pressure. Net absorption ceases at –15 cm H 2 O. Rate of net formation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is equal to inulin clearance plus the difference between outflow and inflow rates; normally it averages 0.16 cm 3 min–1 and is essentially independent of hydrostatic pressures in the range –10 to +30 cm H 2 O. Net rate of formation is linearly related to total osmotic pressure differences between plasma and CSF. The coefficient of osmotic flow is greater than that measured from diffusion of TOH, as in other porous membranes. Passive permeability characteristics resemble those of the vasopressin-treated toad bladder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.5.775

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Heisey, S. R., Held, D., & Pappenheimer, J. R.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content
Published
1962-11-01
Volume
203
Issue
5
Pages
775-781
ISSN
0002-9513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2310995028
Cited by
399
References
0
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.