Cited by 514Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusIon Transport and Channel RegulationBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Physiology of the choroid plexus.

Cserr, H F·1971·Physiological Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.1971.51.2.273

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cserr, H. F.
Corresponding author
Cserr, H F
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
1971-04
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
273-311
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W1898796296
Cited by
514
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
choroid plexus, cerebrospinal fluid, blood-CSF barrier, cerebrospinal fluid production, cerebrospinal fluid flow
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Biological Transport, Active, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Membrane Permeability, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Choroid Plexus, Diffusion, Ependyma, Extracellular Space, Iodides, Methods, Osmosis, Perfusion, Pia Mater, Pressure, Regional Blood Flow, Subarachnoid Space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review