Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Osmotically inactive skin Na + storage in rats

Titze, Jens, Lang, Rainer, Ilies, Christoph, Schwind, Karl H., Kirsch, Karl A., Dietsch, Peter, Luft, Friedrich C., Hilgers, Karl F.·2003·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

Compared with age-matched men, women are resistant to the hypertensive effects of dietary NaCl; however, after menopause, the incidence of salt-sensitive hypertension is similar in women and men. We recently suggested that osmotically inactive Na + storage contributes to the development of salt-sensitive hypertension. The connective tissues, including those immediately below the skin that may serve as a reservoir for osmotically inactive Na + storage, are affected by menopause. We tested the hypothesis that ovariectomy (OVX) might reduce osmotically inactive Na + storage capacity in the body, particularly in the skin. Male, female-fertile, and female OVX Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were fed a high (8%)- or low (0.1%)-NaCl diet. The groups received the diet for 4 or 8 wk. At the end of the experiment, subgroups received 0.9% saline infusion and urinary Na + and K + excretion was measured. Wet and dry weight (DW), water content in the body and skin, total body Na + (rTBNa + ) and skin Na + (rSKNa + ) content were measured relative to DW by desiccation and dry ashing. There were no gender differences in osmotically inactive Na + storage in SD rats. All SD rats accumulated Na + if fed 8% NaCl, but rTBNa + was lower in OVX rats than in fertile rats on a low ( P < 0.001)- and a high ( P < 0.05)-salt diet. OVX decreased rSKNa + ( P < 0.01) in the rats. A high-salt diet led to Na + accumulation (ΔSKNa + ) in the skin in all SD rats. Osmotically inactive skin Na + accumulation was ∼66% of ΔSKNa + in female and 82% in male-fertile rats, but there was no osmotically inactive Na + accumulation in OVX rats fed 8% NaCl. We conclude that skin is an osmotically inactive Na + reservoir that accumulates Na + when dietary NaCl is excessive. OVX leads to an acquired reduction of osmotically inactive Na + storage in SD rats that predisposes the rats to volume excess despite a reduced Na + content relative to body weight.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00200.2003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Titze, J., Lang, R., Ilies, C., Schwind, K. H., Kirsch, K. A., Dietsch, P., Luft, F. C., & Hilgers, K. F.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2003-12
Volume
285
Issue
6
Pages
F1108-F1117
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W2031732867
Cited by
253
References
3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmotically inactive skin Na + storage in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00200.2003
The paper
Titze, J., Lang, R., Ilies, C., Schwind, K. H., Kirsch, K. A., Dietsch, P., Luft, F. C., & Hilgers, K. F. (2003). Osmotically inactive skin Na + storage in rats. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00200.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.