The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of human skeletal muscle buffer value by homogenate technique: methods of measurement
Abstract
The human muscle buffer value (beta) is most frequently determined by either fixed acid titration of a homogenate ["in vitro" beta (beta vit)] or measurement of the change in lactate concentration (delta [La]) relative to the change in muscle homogenate pH after high-intensity exercise ["in vitro" beta = - delta [La]/delta pH (beta viv)]. We sought to compare beta viv, determined after isometric and dynamic exercise to exhaustion (approximately 60 s), with beta vit. Resting (R) and postexercise (E) biopsy samples were taken from vastus lateralis muscles of 43 human volunteers. Freeze-dried muscle was homogenized (30 mg/ml) in NaF (0.01 M) for the measurement of muscle pH (R and E). beta vit was determined by HCl (0.01 M) titration of the homogenate over the pH range 7.1–6.5. Muscle lactate was measured by enzymatic assay. There was no significant difference between beta viv determined after isometric (n = 35) or dynamic (n = 8) exercise to fatigue (170 vs. 168 mmol H+.kg dry muscle mass-1.pH-1, respectively; P > 0.05). Values for beta vit in the corresponding muscle samples (R) were approximately 7–8% lower (156 +/- 25 vs. 157 +/- 18 mmol H+.kg dry muscle mass-1.pH-1, respectively). There was no significant difference (P = 0.278) between the measured decline in muscle homogenate pH after exercise and the reduction in pH predicted from beta vit and delta [La], indirectly confirming the lack of any significant difference between beta viv and beta vit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“contemporary consensus statements emphasise that REDs/LEA remains possible at any age and can present with heterogeneous, partly subclinical manifestations”
From Ageing, Sex Differences, and REDs Risk in Endurance Runners: An Integrated Cross-Sectional Study Protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., Van Essen, M., Wilkin, G. P., Burgomaster, K. A., Safdar, A., Raha, S., & Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112094 · Cited by 1,082
Predominant α2/β2/γ3 AMPK activation during exercise in human skeletal muscle
Birk, J. B., & Wojtaszewski, J. F. P. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120972 · Cited by 293
Roepstorff, C., Thiele, M., Hillig, T., Pilegaard, H., Richter, E. A., Wojtaszewski, J. F. P., & Kiens, B. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108720 · Cited by 238
Edge, J., Bishop, D., & Goodman, C. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01534.2005 · Cited by 137
Muscle pH regulation: role of training
JUEL, C. (1998) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1046/j.1365-201x.1998.0305f.x · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Mannion, A. F., Jakeman, P. M., & Willan, P. L.
- Affiliations
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1412-1418
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of human skeletal muscle buffer value by homogenate technique: methods of measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.3.1412
- The paper
- Mannion, A. F., Jakeman, P. M., & Willan, P. L. (1993). Determination of human skeletal muscle buffer value by homogenate technique: methods of measurement. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.3.1412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.