The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The maximally attainable V̇o2during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue
Abstract
The quantification of maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o 2 max), a parameter characterizing the effective integration of the neural, cardiopulmonary, and metabolic systems, requires oxygen uptake (V̇o 2) to attain a plateau. We were interested in whether a V̇o 2 plateau was consistently manifest during maximal incremental ramp cycle ergometry and also in ascertaining the relationship between this peak V̇o 2(V̇o 2 peak) and that determined from one, or several, maximal constant-load tests. Ventilatory and pulmonary gas-exchange variables were measured breath by breath with a turbine and mass spectrometer. On average, V̇o 2 peak[3.51 ± 0.8 (SD) l/min] for the ramp test did not differ from that extrapolated from the linear phase of the response in 71 subjects. In 12 of these subjects, the V̇o 2 peak was less than the extrapolated value by 0.1-0.4 l/min (i.e., a “plateau”), and in 19 subjects, V̇o 2 peak was higher by 0.05-0.4 l/min. In the remaining 40 subjects, we could not discriminate a difference. The V̇o 2 peak from the incremental test also did not differ from that of a single maximum constant-load test in 38 subjects or from the V̇o 2 max in 6 subjects who undertook a range of progressively greater discontinuous constant-load tests. A plateau in the actual V̇o 2 response is therefore not an obligatory consequence of incremental exercise. Because the peak value attained was not different from the plateau in the plot of V̇o 2 vs. work rate (for the constant-load tests), the V̇o 2 peak attained on a maximum-effort incremental test is likely to be a valid index of V̇o 2 max, despite no evidence of a plateau in the data themselves. However, without additional tests, one cannot be certain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress testing
Pollock, M. L., Bohannon, R. L., Cooper, K. H., Ayres, J. J., Ward, A., White, S. R., & Linnerud, A. C. (1976) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80401-2 · Cited by 536
THE PHYSIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE MAXIMAL OXYGEN INTAKE TEST1
Mitchell, J. H., Sproule, B. J., & Chapman, C. B. (1958) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci103636 · Cited by 516
Time course of loss of adaptations after stopping prolonged intense endurance training
Coyle, E. F., Martin, W. H., Sinacore, D. R., Joyner, M. J., Hagberg, J. M., & Holloszy, J. O. (1984) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1984.57.6.1857 · Cited by 364
Maximal oxygen uptake: ???old??? and ???new??? arguments for a cardiovascular limitation
SALTIN, B., & STRANGE, S. (1992) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199201000-00007 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Guidelines to classify subject groups in sport-science research
Pauw, K. D., Roelands, B., Cheung, S. S., de Geus, B., Rietjens, G., & Meeusen, R. (2013) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.2.111 · Cited by 680
Mezzani, A., Hamm, L. F., Jones, A. M., McBride, P. E., Moholdt, T., Stone, J. A., Urhausen, A., & Williams, M. A. (2013) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487312460484 · Cited by 550
Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake V̇ o 2max : V̇ o 2peak is no longer acceptable
Poole, D. C., & Jones, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2016 · Cited by 533
Beetroot juice and exercise: pharmacodynamic and dose-response relationships
Wylie, L. J., Kelly, J., Bailey, S. J., Blackwell, J. R., Skiba, P. F., Winyard, P. G., Jeukendrup, A. E., Vanhatalo, A., & Jones, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00372.2013 · Cited by 500
Mezzani, A., Agostoni, P., Cohen-Solal, A., Corrà, U., Jegier, A., Kouidi, E., Mazic, S., Meurin, P., Piepoli, M., Simon, A., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832914c8 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, J. R., Rossiter, H. B., Coats, E. M., Skasick, A., & Whipp, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1901-1907
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2006580799
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The maximally attainable V̇o2during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2003
- The paper
- Day, J. R., Rossiter, H. B., Coats, E. M., Skasick, A., & Whipp, B. J. (2003). The maximally attainable V̇o2during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.