Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of inspiratory muscle training on respiratory muscle electromyography and dyspnea during exercise in healthy men

Ramsook, Andrew H., Molgat-Seon, Yannick, Schaeffer, Michele R., Wilkie, Sabrina S., Camp, Pat G., Reid, W. Darlene, Romer, Lee M., Guenette, Jordan A.·2017·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has consistently been shown to reduce exertional dyspnea in health and disease; however, the physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. A growing body of literature suggests that dyspnea intensity can be explained largely by an awareness of increased neural respiratory drive, as measured indirectly using diaphragmatic electromyography (EMGdi). Accordingly, we sought to determine whether improvements in dyspnea following IMT can be explained by decreases in inspiratory muscle electromyography (EMG) activity. Twenty-five young, healthy, recreationally active men completed a detailed familiarization visit followed by two maximal incremental cycle exercise tests separated by 5 wk of randomly assigned pressure threshold IMT or sham control (SC) training. The IMT group ( n = 12) performed 30 inspiratory efforts twice daily against a 30-repetition maximum intensity. The SC group ( n = 13) performed a daily bout of 60 inspiratory efforts against 10% maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), with no weekly adjustments. Dyspnea intensity was measured throughout exercise using the modified 0–10 Borg scale. Sternocleidomastoid and scalene EMG was measured using surface electrodes, whereas EMGdi was measured using a multipair esophageal electrode catheter. IMT significantly improved MIP (pre: −138 ± 45 vs. post: −160 ± 43 cmH 2 O, P < 0.01), whereas the SC intervention did not. Dyspnea was significantly reduced at the highest equivalent work rate (pre: 7.6 ± 2.5 vs. post: 6.8 ± 2.9 Borg units, P < 0.05), but not in the SC group, with no between-group interaction effects. There were no significant differences in respiratory muscle EMG during exercise in either group. Improvements in dyspnea intensity ratings following IMT in healthy humans cannot be explained by changes in the electrical activity of the inspiratory muscles. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Exertional dyspnea intensity is thought to reflect an increased awareness of neural respiratory drive, which is measured indirectly using diaphragmatic electromyography (EMGdi). We examined the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on dyspnea, EMGdi, and EMG of accessory inspiratory muscles. IMT significantly reduced submaximal dyspnea intensity ratings but did not change EMG of any inspiratory muscles. Improvements in exertional dyspnea following IMT may be the result of nonphysiological factors or physiological adaptations unrelated to neural respiratory drive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00046.2017

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
  2. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00520.2015 · DOI
  4. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.018 · DOI
  6. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2003 · DOI
  7. 10.1164/rccm.201504-0841OC · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1155/2004/857476 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60155-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00364.2002 · DOI
  11. 10.1183/2312508X.10011715 · DOI
  12. 10.1183/09031936.00063014 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Langer D, 2014, Eur Respir J, 44, 1912
  14. 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1691 · DOI
  15. 10.1042/CS20070348 · DOI
  16. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.235572 · DOI
  17. 10.2165/00007256-200434020-00005 · DOI
  18. 10.1172/JCI104336 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00950.2013 · DOI
  20. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1055/s-2008-1038794 · DOI
  22. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01470.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.resp.2009.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.235408 · DOI
  25. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000881 · DOI
  26. 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071415 · DOI
  27. 10.1136/thx.2010.142646 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/026404102760000053 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00010 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.resp.2006.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01157.2007 · DOI
  32. 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.074880 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-94-007-6627-3_29 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.resp.2011.06.001 · DOI
  35. 10.2165/00007256-200232090-00003 · DOI
  36. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01380.2003 · DOI
  37. 10.1378/chest.104.1.197 · DOI
  38. 10.1155/2011/540396 · DOI
  39. 10.1152/ajpregu.00409.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1183/09031936.05.00035005 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s00421-005-1375-7 · DOI
  42. 10.1136/thx.39.7.535 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140855 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Ramsook, A. H., Molgat-Seon, Y., Schaeffer, M. R., Wilkie, S. S., Camp, P. G., Reid, W. D., Romer, L. M., & Guenette, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
1267-1275
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
Cited by
70
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (Fondation canadienne pour l'innovation)
  • UBC 4 Year Fellowship
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarship
  • British Columbia Lung Association Rehabilitation Fellowship
  • Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award
  • Providence Health Care Research Institute and St. Paul's Hospital Foundation New Investigator Award

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.