The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arterial-ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the performance of the left ventricle (LV) requires not only examining the properties of the LV itself, but also investigating the modulating effects of the arterial system on left ventricular performance. The interaction of the LV with the arterial system, termed arterial-ventricular coupling (E A/E LV), is a central determinant of cardiovascular performance and cardiac energetics. E A/E LV can be indexed by the ratio of effective arterial elastance (E A; a measure of the net arterial load exerted on the left ventricle) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (E LV; a load-independent measure of left ventricular chamber performance). At rest, in healthy individuals, E A/E LV is maintained within a narrow range, which allows the cardiovascular system to optimize energetic efficiency at the expense of mechanical efficacy. During exercise, an acute mismatch between the arterial and ventricular systems occurs, due to a disproportionate increase in E LV (from an average of 4.3 to 13.2, and 4.7 to 15.5 mmHg·ml−1·m−2 in men and women, respectively) vs. E A (from an average of 2.3 to 3.2, and 2.3 to 2.9 mmHg·ml−1·m−2 in men and women, respectively), to ensure that sufficient cardiac performance is achieved to meet the increased energetic requirements of the body. As a result E A/E LV decreases from an average of 0.58 to 0.34, and 0.52 to 0.27 in men and women, respectively. In this review, we provide an overview of the concept of E A/E LV, and examine the effects of age, hypertension, and heart failure on E A/E LV and its components (E A and E LV) in men and women. We discuss these effects both at rest and during exercise and highlight the mechanistic insights that can be derived from studying E A/E LV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999–2004
Ong, K. L., Cheung, B. M. Y., Man, Y. B., Lau, C. P., & Lam, K. S. L. (2007) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000252676.46043.18 · Cited by 1,395
Cited by
Aguilar, D., Deswal, A., Ramasubbu, K., Mann, D. L., & Bozkurt, B. (2010) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.041 · Cited by 96
Gender-dependent effects of high-fat lard diet on cardiac function in C57Bl/6J mice
Louwe, M. C., van der Hoorn, J. W. A., van den Berg, S. A. A., Jukema, J. W., Romijn, J. A., Willems van Dijk, K., Rensen, P. C. N., Smit, J. W. A., & Steendijk, P. (2012) · Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/h11-153 · Cited by 29
Cardiac Mechanoenergetics in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hieda, M., & Goto, Y. (2020) · Heart Failure Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2020.02.002 · Cited by 19
Currie, K. D., Sasson, Z., & Goodman, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00108.2019 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Chantler, P. D., Lakatta, E. G., & Najjar, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1342-1351
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2008523461
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.