CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Noise Can Explain Expansive, Power-Law Nonlinearities in Neural Response Functions

Miller, Kenneth D., Troyer, Todd W.·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology
DOI 10.1152/jn.00425.2001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many phenomenological models of the responses of simple cells in primary visual cortex have concluded that a cell's firing rate should be given by its input raised to a power greater than one. This is known as an expansive power-law nonlinearity. However, intracellular recordings have shown that a different nonlinearity, a linear-threshold function, appears to give a good prediction of firing rate from a cell's low-pass-filtered voltage response. Using a model based on a linear-threshold function, Anderson et al. showed that voltage noise was critical to converting voltage responses with contrast-invariant orientation tuning into spiking responses with contrast-invariant tuning. We present two separate results clarifying the connection between noise-smoothed linear-threshold functions and power-law nonlinearities. First, we prove analytically that a power-law nonlinearity is the only input-output function that converts contrast-invariant input tuning into contrast-invariant spike tuning. Second, we examine simulations of a simple model that assumes instantaneous spike rate is given by a linear-threshold function of voltage and voltage responses include significant noise. We show that the resulting average spike rate is well described by an expansive power law of the average voltage (averaged over multiple trials), provided that average voltage remains less than about 1.5 SDs of the noise above threshold. Finally, we use this model to show that the noise levels recorded by Anderson et al. are consistent with the degree to which the orientation tuning of spiking responses is more sharply tuned relative to the orientation tuning of voltage responses. Thus neuronal noise can robustly generate power-law input-output functions of the form frequently postulated for simple cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00425.2001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 207

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Miller, K. D., & Troyer, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
653-659
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
DOI
10.1152/jn.00425.2001
OpenAlex
W1961056875
Cited by
207
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY011001, EY11001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
neural noise, power nonlinearity, input-output function, linear threshold functions, simple cells, primary visual cortex, orientation tuning, contrast invariance, voltage noise, spike frequency
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review