Cited by 124Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesVestibular and auditory disorders

Cerebellar asymmetry and its relation to cerebral asymmetry estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

Open access
Wang, Danhong, Buckner, Randy L., Liu, Hesheng·2013·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Asymmetry of the human cerebellum was investigated using intrinsic functional connectivity. Regions of functional asymmetry within the cerebellum were identified during resting-state functional MRI ( n = 500 subjects) and replicated in an independent cohort ( n = 500 subjects). The most strongly right lateralized cerebellar regions fell within the posterior lobe, including crus I and crus II, in regions estimated to link to the cerebral association cortex. The most strongly left lateralized cerebellar regions were located in lobules VI and VIII in regions linked to distinct cerebral association networks. Comparison of cerebellar asymmetry with independently estimated cerebral asymmetry revealed that the lateralized regions of the cerebellum belong to the same networks that are strongly lateralized in the cerebrum. The degree of functional asymmetry of the cerebellum across individuals was significantly correlated with cerebral asymmetry and varied with handedness. In addition, cerebellar asymmetry estimated at rest predicted cerebral lateralization during an active language task. These results demonstrate that functional lateralization is likely a unitary feature of large-scale cerebrocerebellar networks, consistent with the hypothesis that the cerebellum possesses a roughly homotopic map of the cerebral cortex including the prominent asymmetries of the association cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00598.2012

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There were three distinct regions (Crus I, Crus II, lobules IX/X) in the cerebellar posterior lobe that show topographical relationship with cortical association areas.

    “Newly revealed were three distinct regions (Crus I, Crus II, lobules IX/X) in the cerebellar posterior lobe that show topographical relationship with cortical association areas (Buckner et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013).”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2013

  • The cerebro-cerebellum collects information from almost all the entire cortical areas, suggesting that the cerebellum still keeps the position of the CNS hub even in human.

    “Recently, Buckner et al. (2011) and Wang et al. (2013) demonstrated base on this approach that the cerebro-cerebellum collects information from almost all the entire cortical areas, suggesting that the cerebellum still keeps the position of the CNS hub even in human.”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, D., Buckner, R. L., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Hesheng
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
46-57
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1983834115
Cited by
124
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG021910, R01AG021910)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U54MH091665)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K25NS069805)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41 RR14074)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
hemispheric lateralization, functional asymmetry, intrinsic functional connectivity, resting-state fMRI, association cortex, handedness, language tasks
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review