The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrotemporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Areas AI and AAF of Mouse Auditory Cortex
Abstract
The mouse is a promising model system for auditory cortex research because of the powerful genetic tools available for manipulating its neural circuitry. Previous studies have identified two tonotopic auditory areas in the mouse—primary auditory cortex (AI) and anterior auditory field (AAF)— but auditory receptive fields in these areas have not yet been described. To establish a foundation for investigating auditory cortical circuitry and plasticity in the mouse, we characterized receptive-field structure in AI and AAF of anesthetized mice using spectrally complex and temporally dynamic stimuli as well as simple tonal stimuli. Spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) were derived from extracellularly recorded responses to complex stimuli, and frequency-intensity tuning curves were constructed from responses to simple tonal stimuli. Both analyses revealed temporal differences between AI and AAF responses: peak latencies and receptive-field durations for STRFs and first-spike latencies for responses to tone bursts were significantly longer in AI than in AAF. Spectral properties of AI and AAF receptive fields were more similar, although STRF bandwidths were slightly broader in AI than in AAF. Finally, in both AI and AAF, a substantial minority of STRFs were spectrotemporally inseparable. The spectrotemporal interaction typically appeared in the form of clearly disjoint excitatory and inhibitory subfields or an obvious spectrotemporal slant in the STRF. These data provide the first detailed description of auditory receptive fields in the mouse and suggest that although neurons in areas AI and AAF share many response characteristics, area AAF may be specialized for faster temporal processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plasticity of auditory cortex associated with sensorineural hearing loss in adult C57BL/6J mice
Willott, J. F., Aitkin, L. M., & McFadden, S. L. (1993) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903290310 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Improving language and literacy is a matter of time
Tallal, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1499 · Cited by 488
Functional mapping of single spines in cortical neurons in vivo.
Chen, X., Leischner, U., Rochefort, N. L., Nelken, I., & Konnerth, A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10193 · Cited by 395
Linking topography to tonotopy in the mouse auditory thalamocortical circuit
Hackett, T. A., Rinaldi Barkat, T., O'Brien, B. M. J., Hensch, T. K., & Polley, D. B. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5333-10.2011 · Cited by 216
Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex
Nelken, I. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.005 · Cited by 223
Auditory Cortical Detection and Discrimination Correlates with Communicative Significance
Liu, R. C., & Schreiner, C. E. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050173 · Cited by 130
Self-citationImproved cortical entrainment to infant communication calls in mothers compared with virgin mice
Liu, R. C., Linden, J. F., & Schreiner, C. E. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x · Cited by 112
Self-citationInferring input nonlinearities in neural encoding models
Ahrens, M. B., Paninski, L., & Sahani, M. (2008) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/09548980701813936 · Cited by 72
Self-citationParvalbumin immunoreactivity in the auditory cortex of a mouse model of presbycusis.
Martin del Campo, H. N., Measor, K. R., & Razak, K. A. (2012) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.017 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Linden, J. F., Liu, R. C., Sahani, M., Schreiner, C. E., & Merzenich, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2660-2675
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2093282630
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.